Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Wahrsager Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$74k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$526kHealth$98kHuman Services$50kScience & Tech$40kEnvironment$20kArts & Culture$14kPhilanthropy$12kPublic Benefit$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $53k
$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$280k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL$22,500
SMITH COLLEGE$20,000
RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF SUNY$10,000
BELMONT DAY SCHOOL$5,000
ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND$5,000
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,000
THE NATURE CONNECTION$1,000
CANAVAN FOUNDATION$1,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$750
PETA$500
ROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION$500
THE DOE FUND$500
THIRTEEN$250
SUSAN G KOMEN BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $4k → 6%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $500 → 17%CANAVAN FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%CANAVAN FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%CANAVAN FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%CANAVAN FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%CANAVAN FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%CANAVAN FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%CANAVAN FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
VA
MD
TN
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$865k · 43 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
16

Total granted

$865k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+38%

Still filing today

67%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthAnimalsEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    ETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $205k · revenue +35%
  • TT
    THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $178k · revenue +52%
  • BD
    BELMONT DAY SCHOOL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • CS
    CAMP STARFISH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +49%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FOLK ART MUSEUM
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -36%
  • VO
    VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
4
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
5
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
6
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
7
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
8
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
9
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
10
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
11
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
12
Public Responsibility in Medicine & Research Inc

Prim&r advances the highest ethical standards in the conduct of biomedical, behavioral and social science research. prim&r accomplishes this mission through education, membership services, professional certification, public policy…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Doe Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Citizenship Counts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/43
Grantees still filing
34/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL: $205,000 · EducationETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOLTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $177,500 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGEBELMONT DAY SCHOOL INC: $45,000 · EducationBELMONT DAY SCHOOL INCThe Trustees of Princeton University: $45,000 · EducationThe Trustees of Princeton UniversityThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $40,000 · EducationThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York+1 more: $10,000 · EducationHOLDEN COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER: $60,000 · OtherHOLDEN COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTERRESEARCH FOUNDATION OF NEW YORK: $40,000 · OtherRESEARCH FOUNDATION OF NEW YORKST MEL CATHOLIC ACADEMY: $39,000 · OtherST MEL CATHOLIC ACADEMYNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC: $30,000 · OtherNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INCTHE NATURE CONNECTION INC: $21,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONNECTION INCCOLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARY: $11,500 · OtherANNETTE URSO RICKEL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Other+33 more: $51,115 · Other+33 moreLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC: $15,000 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $11,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC: $2,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,600 · HealthPhysicians Committee for Responsible Med: $1,250 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,250 · Health+2 more: $750 · HealthISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $24,000 · Human ServicesCanavan Foundation Inc: $7,000 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesCITIZENSHIP COUNTS: $8,500 · Public Benefit+1 more: $100 · Public BenefitUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $8,000 · PhilanthropyROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $500 · PhilanthropyGETTING OUT AND STAYING OUT INC: $7,500 · Crime & Legal
Education$522,500Other$262,615Health$32,850Human Services$31,500Public Benefit$8,600Philanthropy$8,500Crime & Legal$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL: $205,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $177,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBELMONT DAY SCHOOL INC: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $24,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONNECTION INC: $21,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENSHIP COUNTS: $8,500 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGETTING OUT AND STAYING OUT INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC: $4,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP STARFISH INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $2,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $2,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORK SOCIETY LIBRARY: $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DOE FUND INC: $1,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPhysicians Committee for Responsible Med: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOLK ART MUSEUM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAUQUIER SPCA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJBI INTERNATIONAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVESTED INTEREST IN K9S INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World Action Fund: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BELMONT DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
  • Who funds NEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONNECTION INC ↗
  • Who funds LUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENSHIP COUNTS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds GETTING OUT AND STAYING OUT INC ↗
  • Who funds Canavan Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP STARFISH INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds INNER CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORK SOCIETY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds THE DOE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds Physicians Committee for Responsible Med ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Wahrsager Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Wahrsager Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Camp Starfish Inc: 18% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • The Nature Connection Inc: 5% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wahrsager’s filings →

More from the funding graph