Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Waghorne Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$246k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$161k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $42k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $161k
$2,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SMU$161,056
HPUMC$12,000
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WNC$10,000
SUMMIT CHARTER SCHOOL FOUNDATION$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE PLATEAU$10,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$5,000
VISITING NURSES ASSOCIATION$5,000
THE MAGDALEN HOUSE$5,000
SALVATION ARMY$5,000
NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK$5,000
NEVER STOP BELIEVING FOUNDATION$3,000
THE SENIOR SOURCE$2,500
TURTLE CREEK ASSOCIATION$2,500
NEXUS FAMILY RECOVERY CENTER$1,500
DYLEXIA CENTER OF AUSTIN$1,250
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
CA
KY
VA
TN
NC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dcms Foundation

The dcms foundation's mission is to improve the quality and distribution of health services throughout dallas county.

Health
2
Dallas Seminary Foundation

To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.

Education
3
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
4
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
5
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

6
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
7
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

8
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

9
Episcopal Foundation of Dallas

The foundation's mission is to strengthen and support faith communities by partnering wise investments with purposeful giving.

Religion
10
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
11
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
12
International Women's Forum Inc

The mission of the international women's forum is to advance women's leadership worldwide. iwf takes direct action to achieve our mission in three important ways. connect: our convenings provide networking and cutting-edge content…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Dallas Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Dwc Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SMU — $161,056 · OtherSMUHPUMC — $12,000 · OtherHPUMC+12 more — $30,500 · Other+12 moreBoys & Girls Club of The Plateau Inc — $10,000 · EducationBoys & Gi…Summit Charter School Foundation — $10,000 · EducationSummit Ch…THE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY — $1,000 · EducationTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $100 · PhilanthropyWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesTURTLE CREEK ASSOCIATION — $2,500 · EnvironmentNexus Recovery Center Incorporated — $1,500 · HealthLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $250 · HealthMercy Ships International — $500 · InternationalFRIENDS OF GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK — $500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$203,556Education$21,000Philanthropy$11,100Human Services$5,000Environment$2,500Health$1,750International$500Recreation & Sports$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSummit Charter School Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURTLE CREEK ASSOCIATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDWC FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL12.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Waghorne Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph