How much did THE W MANSFIELD JENNINGS JR grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 95% of THE W MANSFIELD JENNINGS JR’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

—

2020

middle

2021

churchmiddle

2022

mercer

2023

taylor caremiddle

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k11 grants · $29k
$10k–50k4 grants · $74k
$50k–250k3 grants · $244k

$5,000

Median grant

States reached

$8.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

MERCER UNIVERSITY$95,500
MIDDLE GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY$84,083
UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA$64,000
TAYLOR MEMORIAL CARE FOUNDATION$33,000
PULASKI COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION$20,500
MUSEUM OF AVIATION FOUNDATION$10,000
ROME CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL$10,000
HAWKINSVILLE FIRST UNITED METHODIST$5,000
HAWKINSVILLE PULASKI CO ARTS COUNCI$5,000
EDUCATIONAL PATHWAYS INC$5,000
THE OTIS REDDING FOUNDATION$5,000
REACH GA FOUNDATION$4,000
CENTRAL GA TECHNICAL FOUNDATION$2,500
THE RESCUE RANCH$1,000
PULASKI COUNTY EXTENSION4-H$500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.5M · 20 repeat orgs$173k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +90% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.5M

$166k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%

+9%

Still filing today

35%

25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentScience & TechEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

RC
ROME CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL
5× · 2019–2024 · $61k · revenue +39%
WS
Westfield School
2× · 2017–2021 · $34k · revenue +5%
TO
THE OTIS REDDING FOUNDATION
5× · 2017–2024 · $28k · revenue +1245%

Funded once

MU
MERCER UNIVERSITY MCDUFFIE CENTER
one grant, 2020 · $100k
2C
21St Century Partnership
one grant, 2017 · $10k
AS
Agnes Scott Collegegraduated
one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +48%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Toccoa Falls College Inc

Christian undergraduate and graduate education with residential & non-residential offerings.

Education

Greenville College

To transform students for lives of character and service through a christ-centered education.

Education

Millsaps College

Millsaps college is a private nonprofit liberal arts college based in jackson, ms; providing education and training services for students at the undergraduate and graduate level

Education

Georgia State University Foundation Inc

Support the mission and best interests of georgia state university

Education

Central Piedmont Community College

Central piedmont community college will be a champion of students, a catalyst for opportunity, and an exceptional provider of learning experiences that transform lives and strengthen our community. the college facilitates student learning,…

Education

Florida Southern College

Private united methodist affiliated college that is committed to educational excellence.

Education

College of Charleston Foundation

To promote education, research, and development programs for the exclusive benefit of the college of charleston

Education

Davidson College

Undergraduate liberal arts education

Education

Georgia Piedmont Technical College Foundation Inc

The mission of the Georgia Piedmont Technical College Foundation is to (1) Promote the cause of postsecondary technical and adult education (2) to help support educational opportunities for the constituents of Georgia Piedmont Technical…

Education

Forsyth Technical Community College

The purposes of the foundation are to foster public understanding of, and support for, forsyth technical community college and to solicit and promote donations of any kind for the exclusive benefit of the college.

Education

James M Dye Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to facilitate the education of students at the waycross campus of south georgia state college who require financial support beyond the resources otherwise available to them.

Education

Tougaloo College

The College is an institution of higher education and provides instruction and various support services in achieving its purpose.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Central and the most unlike its peers is Agnes Scott College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/23

the rest of the field

15%

2,313/15,683

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

16/16

Grantees still filing

11/16

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,495,182Arts & Culture$93,600Human Services$18,000Education$10,000Science & Tech$7,500Philanthropy$5,000Environment$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ra Bowen TrustGA16× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ra Bowen Trust · The Peyton Anderson Foundation · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE W MANSFIELD JENNINGS JR funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ROME CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 200525680 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ROME CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 6% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The W Mansfield Jennings Jr?

Find your warmest path to The W Mansfield Jennings Jr through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE W MANSFIELD JENNINGS JR

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The W Mansfield Jennings Jr?

More from the funding graph

THE W MANSFIELD JENNINGS JR

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The W Mansfield Jennings Jr?

More from the funding graph