· Public charity
The Voter Project
The Voter Project is a non-partisan, non-profit organization dedicated to ensuring all Pennsylvania voters can cast a ballot in a safe, secure, and convenient way.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k8 grants · $215k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $1.3M
- $250k+3 grants · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Black Leadership Pennsylvania | $633,595 |
| Black Leadership Pennsylvania | $366,405 |
| Black Leadership Pennsylvania | $350,000 |
| PA Alliance Action | $200,000 |
| PA Alliance Action | $200,000 |
| Keystone Democracy | $160,000 |
| Keystone Democracy | $120,000 |
| PA Alliance Action | $100,000 |
| PA Alliance Action | $100,000 |
| Promote the Vote | $75,148 |
| Organize Pennsylvania | $75,000 |
| Keystone Democracy | $70,000 |
| Promote the Vote | $67,500 |
| Tides Center | $60,000 |
| Committee of Seventy | $60,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PAPA ALLIANCE ACTION2× · 2020–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +98%
- PFPENNSYLVANIA FORWARD3× · 2020–2022 · $220k · revenue +18% · 50% of their budget
- NPNew Pennsylvania Project2× · 2022–2024 · $105k · revenue +71%
Funded once
- IUIn Union USA Actionone grant, 2020 · $750k
- TLTHE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE EDUCATION FUND INCone grant, 2020 · $202k · revenue -71%
- CCCOMMONWEALTH COMMUNICATIONSone grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue -36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Informed and educated the public and lawmakers about the benefits of including independent voters in Pennsylvania's primary elections.
Cultivating the next generation of progressive leaders across the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
PA United organizes and builds power across Western PA to create
Pa alliance foundation ("paaf") is a 501(c)(3) public charity that is focused on civic engagement and democracy advancement across pennsylvania, working to expand access to the ballot through non-partisan voter education and mobilization.…
We The People PA is an issue advocacy organization that works to make PA economy work for all; with a system of taxation that is fair and progressive and raises sufficient revenue to provide quality education and public services for all.
Our mission is to empower and engage communities of color in Philadelphia through voter education, community outreach, and civic engagement initiatives. We are committed to ensuring every voice is heard by providing accessible information…
Provide public education in support of planned parenthood health services, including family planning and abortion care.
To develop and advocate for legislation, regulations, and government programs to protect against judicial gerrymandering and other legislative barriers to fair courts, and to conduct research about and publicize the positions of elected…
) to lead and engage in campaigns that empower Black workers to advance our rights and improve job quality in key employment sectors
The organization's non-partisan mission is to increase voter turnout and participation in local elections.
Leadership training and comprehensive professional development programs for community activists, advocates, and prospective leaders of nonprofits and other issue advocacy organizations across the
To invest in the activation, long-term engagement, and mobilization of
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Promote the Vote Pa and the most unlike its peers is Cair-Pennsylvania. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Black Leadership Pennsylvania ↗
- Who funds PA ALLIANCE ACTION ↗
- Who funds Keystone Democracy ↗
- Who funds In Union USA Action ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA FORWARD ↗
- Who funds THE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds COMMONWEALTH COMMUNICATIONS ↗
- Who funds PROMOTE THE VOTE PA ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA PROGRESS ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR VOTER INFORMATION ↗
- Who funds New Pennsylvania Project ↗
- Who funds ORGANIZE PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds COMMITTEE OF SEVENTY ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds RAISEDBY US INC ↗
- Who funds PRIORITIES USA ↗
- Who funds CASA INC ↗
- Who funds POWER INTERFAITH INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE THE ROAD ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds FOR OUR FUTURE EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds POWER ACTION FUND ↗
- Who funds CAIR-PENNSYLVANIA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sixteen Thirty Fund · Tides Foundation · PA Alliance Foundation · America Votes · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · Pa Alliance Action · Pro-Democracy Campaign · State Engagement Fund · Working Families Organization Inc · Our American Future Action · Open Society Action Fund Inc · Tides Advocacy
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Voter Project funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Voter Project?
Find your warmest path to The Voter Project through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.