Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Pa Alliance Action

The PA Alliance Action seeks to advocate at the state level for democracy reform through grassroots activities and support of like-minded organizations on behalf of and in support of all Pennsylvanians, in particular historically marginalized and underserved communities, including communities of color, impoverished communities and the…

$11M
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$4.7M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Public Benefit$26MCivil Rights$1.7MEnvironment$810kCommunity Improvement$412kHealth$280kHuman Services$200kFood & Nutrition$20k
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+10 grants · $9.6M
$275,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$635k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Project 26 Pennsylvania$4,726,000
Commonwealth Communications$1,286,000
Project Keystone$847,800
Working Families Organization$538,781
PA United$500,000
The Voter Project$450,000
Make the Road Action Inc$355,200
Asian Pacific Islander Political Alliance$340,000
New Pennsylvania Project$280,000
For Our Future Action Fund$275,000
Action Together NEPA$225,000
CASA in Action$168,219
PA Alliance Foundation$144,000
Conservation Voters of PA Victory Fund$120,000
Promote the Vote$110,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $478k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CASA in Action: $168k → 11%CASA In Action Inc: $100k → 11%CASA in Action: $100k → 11%Promote the Vote: $110k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Pa Alliance Action’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Pa Alliance Actionlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.8% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$22M · 17 repeat orgs$7.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +154% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
7

Total granted

$22M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+154%
+2%

Still filing today

94%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PK
    Project Keystone
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +536% · 50% of their budget
  • PU
    Pennsylvania United
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +198%
  • FO
    FOR OUR FUTURE ACTION FUND
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +154%

Funded once

  • AW
    America Works
    one grant, 2022 · $1.3M
  • GI
    GOODPOWER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $355k · revenue +476% · 57% of their budget
  • UA
    UNIDOSUS ACTION FUND INC
    one grant, 2022 · $120k · revenue -45%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Keystone Democracy

Keystone Democracy's goal is to ensure that all Pennsylvania elections are implemented in a safe, secure, convenient and fair manner. We work to advance pro-democracy policies by informing elected officials, civic leaders, the media, and…

—
2
Ballot Pa Action

Informed and educated the public and lawmakers about the benefits of including independent voters in Pennsylvania's primary elections.

Civil Rights
3
Pa Alliance Action

The PA Alliance Action seeks to advocate at the state level for democracy reform through grassroots activities and support of like-minded organizations on behalf of and in support of all Pennsylvanians, in particular historically…

Civil Rights
4
We the People Pennsylvania Action

We The People PA is an issue advocacy organization that works to make PA economy work for all; with a system of taxation that is fair and progressive and raises sufficient revenue to provide quality education and public services for all.

—
5
Pennsylvania Forward

To advocate for progressive policies in pennsylvania

—
6
Pennsylvania Progress

Provide nonpartisan vote by mail education in pennslyvania.

—
7
Pennsylvanians for Fair Courts

To develop and advocate for legislation, regulations, and government programs to protect against judicial gerrymandering and other legislative barriers to fair courts, and to conduct research about and publicize the positions of elected…

—
8
Planned Parenthood Association of Pa

Provide public education in support of planned parenthood health services, including family planning and abortion care.

—
9
Black Leadership Pennsylvania

BLPA's mission is to increase Black voter turnout and advance a bold policy agenda that improves Black Pennsylvanians' economic, social, and political well-being. Through grassroots organizing, advocacy, leadership development, and…

—
10
Pennsylvania First

To invest in the activation, long-term engagement, and mobilization of

—
11
Pittsburgh United

Pittsburgh United, Inc. strives to advance social & economic justice in the

Community Improvement
12
Pennsylvania Voice

Pennsylvania voice works toward increasing overall participation in our democracy through increased education and mobilization.

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Promote the Vote Pa and the most unlike its peers is Goodpower Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
14/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMONWEALTH COMMUNICATIONS — $6,966,000 · OtherCOMMONWEALTH COMMUNICATIONSPROJECT 26 PENNSYLVANIA — $4,726,000 · OtherPROJECT 26 PENNSYLVANIAThe Voter Project — $3,790,000 · OtherThe Voter ProjectFOR OUR FUTURE ACTION FUND — $1,499,000 · OtherFOR OUR FUTURE ACTION FUNDAmerica Works — $1,250,000 · OtherAmerica WorksLead PA — $1,026,500 · Other+9 more — $2,339,000 · Other+9 moreProject Keystone — $2,430,550 · Civil RightsProject KeystonePennsylvania United — $1,593,625 · Civil RightsPennsylvania UnitedMAKE THE ROAD ACTION INC — $802,825 · Civil RightsMAKE THE ROAD ACTION INCNew Pennsylvania Project — $678,250 · Civil RightsNew Pennsylvania ProjectWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC — $538,781 · Civil RightsWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZA…ORGANIZE PENNSYLVANIA — $415,000 · Civil RightsORGANIZE PENNSYLVANIA+3 more — $244,000 · Civil RightsCASA IN ACTION INC — $368,219 · Human ServicesPROMOTE THE VOTE PA — $110,000 · Human ServicesGOODPOWER INC — $355,000 · EnvironmentFOOD & WATER ACTION FUND — $45,000 · EnvironmentPLANNED PARENTHOOD PENNSYLVANIA ADVOCATES — $280,000 · HealthAmerica Votes — $75,000 · Community Improvement
Other$21,596,500Civil Rights$6,703,031Human Services$478,219Environment$400,000Health$280,000Community Improvement$75,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMONWEALTH COMMUNICATIONS — $6,966,000 over 5y, 90% of budgetPROJECT 26 PENNSYLVANIA — $4,726,000 over 1y, 66% of budgetThe Voter Project — $3,790,000 over 5y, 24% of budgetProject Keystone — $2,430,550 over 6y, 50% of budgetPennsylvania United — $1,593,625 over 5y, 19% of budgetFOR OUR FUTURE ACTION FUND — $1,499,000 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetLead PA — $1,026,500 over 5y, 95% of budgetMAKE THE ROAD ACTION INC — $802,825 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetNew Pennsylvania Project — $678,250 over 4y, 16% of budgetACTION TOGETHER NEPA — $577,000 over 3y, 42% of budgetWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC — $538,781 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetORGANIZE PENNSYLVANIA — $415,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetCASA IN ACTION INC — $368,219 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetGOODPOWER INC — $355,000 over 1y, 57% of budgetConservation Voters of Pennsylvania — $335,000 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD PENNSYLVANIA ADVOCATES — $280,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA SPOTLIGHT — $225,000 over 2y, 55% of budgetPA Alliance Foundation — $144,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budget1K Women Strong Inc — $125,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetUNIDOSUS ACTION FUND INC — $120,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetPROMOTE THE VOTE PA — $110,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetFree Fair PA — $100,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetAmerica Votes — $75,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKEYSTONE PROGRESS — $50,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetBLACK MEN VOTE — $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFOOD & WATER ACTION FUND — $45,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sixteen Thirty FundAmerica VotesCommonwealth Communic…Tides AdvocacyAll Hands on Deck Net…Tides FoundationPA Alliance FoundationOur American Future A…Way to Win Action Fun…Hopewell FundNorth FundOpen Society Action F…
Sixteen Thirty FundDC43.3× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sixteen Thirty Fund · America Votes · Commonwealth Communications · Tides Advocacy · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · Tides Foundation · PA Alliance Foundation · Our American Future Action · Way to Win Action Fund Inc · Hopewell Fund · North Fund · Open Society Action Fund Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pa Alliance Action funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pa Alliance Action?

    Find your warmest path to Pa Alliance Action through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines