Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Vitale Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$288k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.3MArts & Culture$1.2MInternational$290kYouth Development$208kCommunity Improvement$164kHousing & Shelter$103kHuman Services$97kScience & Tech$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $210k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE$50,000
MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY$25,000
ACADEMY FOR URBAN SCHOOL LEADERSHIP$25,000
TEACH FOR AMERICA INC$25,000
LEADERSHIP GREATER CHICAGO INC$25,000
MUSIC AND DANCE THEATER CHICAGO INC$25,000
INGENUITY INCORPORATED CHICAGO$15,000
A BETTER CHICAGO$10,000
SURGE INSTITUTE$10,000
WINGS PROGRAM INC$10,000
UCAN$10,000
CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS$10,000
INGENUITY INCORPORATED CHICAGO$10,000
LEADERSHIP GREATER CHICAGO INC$10,000
MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $293k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $25k → 14%A BETTER CHICAGO: $15k → 14%A BETTER CHICAGO: $15k → 14%A BETTER CHICAGO: $15k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $10k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $10k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $10k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $10k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $10k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $10k → 14%FAMILY FOCUS: $5k → 14%OPTIONS FOR YOUTH: $3k → 14%A BETTER CHICAGO: $20k → 14%A BETTER CHICAGO: $15k → 14%A BETTER CHICAGO: $15k → 14%A BETTER CHICAGO: $10k → 14%A BETTER CHICAGO: $10k → 14%A BETTER CHICAGO: $10k → 14%UCAN: $25k → 14%UCAN: $15k → 14%UCAN: $10k → 14%UCAN: $10k → 14%UCAN: $10k → 14%UCAN: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 31 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
14

Total granted

$3.2M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+23%

Still filing today

87%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • II
    Illinois Institute of Technology
    6× · 2017–2024 · $400k · revenue +27%
  • MA
    MUSIC AND DANCE THEATER CHICAGO INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $314k · revenue +66%
  • TA
    THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
    7× · 2017–2024 · $293k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • GA
    GLENWOOD ACADEMY
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -23%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +23%
  • Family Focusgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +158%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
2
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
3
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
4
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
5
The University of Chicago Charter School Corporation

To Prepare Students for Success in Four-Year Colleges.

Education
6
The Chicago High School for the Arts

The chicago high school for the arts (chiarts) develops the next generation of diverse, artistically promising scholar-artists through intensive pre-professional training in the arts, combined with a comprehensive college preparatory…

Education
7
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
8
Music Institute of Chicago

The music institute of chicago ("music institute") leads people toward a lifelong engagement with music, by providing widely accessible resources for high quality music teaching, performing, and service activities.

Arts & Culture
9
Lyric Opera of Chicago

We believe in the life-changing, transformational, revelatory power of great art and opera. Lyric Opera of Chicago exists to provide a broad, deep, and relevant cultural service to the Chicago region and the nation, and to advance the…

Arts & Culture
10
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

—
11
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
12
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids First Chicago for Education; the most unlike its peers is Court Theatre Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/43
Grantees still filing
28/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Illinois Institute of Technology: $400,000 · EducationIllinois Institute of TechnologyTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $292,500 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGOPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $150,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard CollegeUniversity of Chicago: $115,000 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoCHICAGO PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $100,000 · EducationCHICAGO PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDSURGE INSTITUTE: $50,000 · Education+7 more: $121,000 · Education+7 moreCourt Theatre Fund: $585,908 · Arts & CultureCourt Theatre FundMUSIC AND DANCE THEATER CHICAGO INC: $313,500 · Arts & CultureMUSIC AND DANCE THEATER CHICAGO INCINGENUITY INCORPORATED CHICAGO: $149,000 · Arts & CultureINGENUITY INCORPORATED CHICAGO+8 more: $65,300 · Arts & Culture+8 moreA Better Chicago: $125,000 · Human ServicesA Better …The YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $85,000 · Human ServicesThe YMCA …UCAN: $75,000 · Human ServicesUCAN+2 more: $7,500 · Human ServicesTHE CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS: $290,000 · InternationalTHE CHICA…TEACH FOR AMERICA-CHICAGO: $160,000 · OtherTEACH FOR A…HAND IN HAND OF GLYNN INC: $40,000 · OtherHAND IN HAN…UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS: $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY …CITY YEAR INC: $20,000 · OtherCITY YEAR I…WINGS PROGRAM INC: $57,500 · OtherWINGS PROGR…+10 more: $45,750 · Other+10 moreCHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE INC: $66,000 · Community ImprovementTHE BOTTOM LINE INC: $15,000 · Community ImprovementMETROPOLITAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $10,000 · Community ImprovementLEADERSHIP GREATER CHICAGO: $87,500 · Public Benefit
Education$1,228,500Arts & Culture$1,113,708Human Services$292,500International$290,000Other$348,250Community Improvement$91,000Public Benefit$87,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIllinois Institute of Technology: $400,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMUSIC AND DANCE THEATER CHICAGO INC: $313,500 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $292,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS: $290,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINGENUITY INCORPORATED CHICAGO: $149,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetA Better Chicago: $125,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $115,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $100,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetLEADERSHIP GREATER CHICAGO: $87,500 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetThe YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago: $85,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUCAN: $75,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE INC: $66,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWINGS PROGRAM INC: $57,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSURGE INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHAND IN HAND OF GLYNN INC: $40,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACADEMY FOR URBAN SCHOOL LEADERSHIP: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetADVANCE ILLINOIS NFP: $21,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEDUCATORS FOR EXCELLENCE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS FIRST CHICAGO FOR EDUCATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BOTTOM LINE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPlanned Parenthood of Illinois: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLENWOOD ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWriters Theatre Inc: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCatholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Focus: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYEAR UP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREADING BETWEEN THE LINES NFP: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOPTIONS FOR YOUTH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANDERSON RANCH ARTS CENTER: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLawrence Hall: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPorchlight Music Theatre Chicago: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFacets Film Forum: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTRIVE: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Illinois Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC AND DANCE THEATER CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds INGENUITY INCORPORATED CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds A Better Chicago ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP GREATER CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds The YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago ↗
  • Who funds UCAN ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds WINGS PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds SURGE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds HAND IN HAND OF GLYNN INC ↗
  • Who funds Kenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds ACADEMY FOR URBAN SCHOOL LEADERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds ADVANCE ILLINOIS NFP ↗
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATORS FOR EXCELLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS FIRST CHICAGO FOR EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BOTTOM LINE INC ↗
  • Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood of Illinois ↗
  • Who funds GLENWOOD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN PLANNING COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Writers Theatre Inc ↗
  • Who funds MERIT SCHOOL OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Family Focus ↗
  • Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL34.7× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · The Robert Thomas Bobins Foundation · Finnegan Family Foundation · Circle of Service Foundation · Frank Family Foundation · Fifth Third Chicagoland Foundation · Fulk Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Vitale Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Vitale Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • The Bottom Line Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Vitale Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Vitale Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Vitale Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph