How much did THE VINCENT AND CAROL W DEAN FAMILY grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 63% of THE VINCENT AND CAROL W DEAN FAMILY’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

children's

2019

children'scare

2020

children'scare

2021

children's

2022

children'scare

2023

librarychildrensshelterhospicecare

2024

librarychildrensshelterhospicecare

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k5 grants · $23k
$10k–50k12 grants · $235k

$15,000

Median grant

States reached

$6.0M

Total assets

Largest grants

FAMILY SERVICES INC$30,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC$25,000
COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES$25,000
VASSAR BROS MEDICAL CENTER$25,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF COLLIER CO$25,000
THE CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CENTER$25,000
NANTUCKET PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN$20,000
MILLBROOK COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC$15,000
PUPPIES BEHIND BARS$15,000
NANTUCKET SAFE HARBOR FOR ANIMALS I$10,000
THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORID$10,000
FLORIDA CANCER SPECIALISTS FOUNDATI$10,000
HUDSON VALLEY HOSPICE FOUNDATION$5,000
GRACE SMITH HOUSE$5,000
CHILDRENS HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $197k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 10%. 8% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.5M · 20 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.5M

$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%

+134%

Still filing today

65%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationAnimalsHealthCrime & LegalEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NH
NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC
6× · 2019–2024 · $150k · revenue +14%
TC
THE CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CENTER
6× · 2019–2024 · $107k · revenue +29%
FS
FAMILY SERVICES INC
4× · 2021–2024 · $105k · revenue +269%

Funded once

TB
THORNE BUILDING FOUNDATION
one grant, 2019 · $5k
CI
CARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEM STUDIESgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +134%
FS
FAMILY SERVICES NEW YORK
one grant, 2018 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare.

Animals

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic

Advancing health through research, education, clinical practice, and community partnerships; providing each person the best care in the right place, at the right time, every time.

Health

Family Health Network of Central

Family health network of central new york, inc. operates free standing diagnostic and treatment centers, licensed under article 28 of new york state law, located in the counties of cortland and cayuga. the family health network of central…

Health

Buckley Country Day School

To provide education to students from general nursery through 8th grade.

Education

Craftsbury Community Care Center

Residential care home for elderly and handicapped.

Human Services

Child Care Council of Westchester Inc

Westchester County's leading authority on child care, the Child Care Council of Westchester, Inc. is one of the largest child care resource and referral agencies in the state of New York. A nonprofit, 501(c)(3) agency, the Council plays a…

Human Services

Woodland Pond Inc

Operate a continuing care retirement community under article 46 of ny state public health law

Housing & Shelter

Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

Central maine healthcare corporation supports its affiliated healthcare institutions in order for these entities to provide exceptional healthcare services.

Health

United Children's Services of

Children's services

Human Services

Cold Spring School Inc

Independent day school for children from preschool through grade six

Education

Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

Nassau County Spca Inc

To protect nassau county's animals from cruel & inhumane treatment (see schedule o)nassau county spca inc.'s mission is to protect nassau county's animals from cruel & inhumane treatment and put an end to animal suffering through…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

16/16

Grantees still filing

15/16

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$995,000Human Services$197,000Health$150,000Education$109,000Crime & Legal$107,000Animals$13,751Environment$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundations of the HudsonNY26.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundations of the Hudson · The Dyson Foundation · James J McCann Charitable Trust · Henry L Kimelman Family Foundation · Berkshire Taconic Community · Herbert H Redl Family Foundation · The George Whalen Jr Fdtn Inc · Plymouth Hill Foundation · Pm Foundation Inc · Hathaway Family Foundation · The Ascienzo Family Foundation · United Way of the Dutchess-Orange

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE VINCENT AND CAROL W DEAN FAMILY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CENTER.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~4 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 141584091 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION CENTER, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Vincent and Carol W Dean Family?

Find your warmest path to The Vincent and Carol W Dean Family through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE VINCENT AND CAROL W DEAN FAMILY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Vincent and Carol W Dean Family?

More from the funding graph

THE VINCENT AND CAROL W DEAN FAMILY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Vincent and Carol W Dean Family?

More from the funding graph