Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Van Horn Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$34k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$83kArts & Culture$55kReligion$36kFood & Nutrition$30kEnvironment$21kCrime & Legal$13kHuman Services$10kAnimals$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$348k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MCDANIEL COLLEGE$11,560
ST VINCENT ACADEMY$3,000
POINT PLEASANT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$2,400
FIRST UNION AFRICAN BAPTIST CHURCH$2,000
DEEP WELL PROJECT$2,000
WAYNE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY$2,000
VICTIMS INTERVENTION PROGRAM$1,000
HONESDALE COMMUNITIES THAT CARE INC$1,000
SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE$1,000
SOUTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL LAW PROJECT$1,000
THE WAYNE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATI$1,000
FRIENDS OF EAST BROADTOP RR$1,000
HONESDALE EMERGENCY PANTRY$1,000
ST GREGORY'S PANTRY$1,000
COMMON GROUND ON THE HILL$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HUMAN RESOURCES CENTER: $500 → 13%WAYNE COUNTY YMCA: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 71% of The Van Horn Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 29% of the giving stays in PA; read by stated purpose it is 6% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Van Horn Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$264k · 29 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
18

Total granted

$264k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+30%

Still filing today

45%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentFood & NutritionAnimalsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CG
    COMMON GROUND ON THE HILL LTD
    8× · 2017–2025 · $39k · revenue +8%
  • MC
    MCDANIEL COLLEGE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +64%
  • WC
    WAYNE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • FU
    FIRST UNION AFRIAN BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF EAST BROADTOP RAILROAD
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WAYNE COUNTY PA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +35%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayne County Humane Society
Animals
2
Harry R Hughes Center for Agro-Ecology

The Center brings together diverse interests from the agricultural, forestry, and environmental communities for the purpose of retaining Maryland's working landscapes and the industries they support while protecting and improving the…

Food & Nutrition
3
Wilmington Country Club

Each of the enumerated activities is substantially related and significantly contributes to the social interaction and camaraderie of the entire membership of the organization.

4
Headwaters Ecology and Community Centers
Philanthropy
5
Cape May Point Science Center
Arts & Culture
6
Isle of Wight County Museum Foundation Inc
Arts & Culture
7
Hancock County Planning Commission

The Hancock County Planning Commission advocates for and provides assistance to county and local governments by: - Protecting our heritage and resources,- Planning for the future- Promoting a sound economy for the people of Hancock County

Environment
8
Hunterdon Humane Animal Shelter Inc
Animals
9
Humane Society of Wicomico County Inc

The humane society is working to make a difference in the lives of animals and the people who love and care for them, and is dedicated to relieving the pain and suffering of animals through education and direct intervention.

Animals
10
Lower Howards Creek Nature and Heritage Preserve Inc

The organization was formed to manage a 441 acre nature preserve. management includes controlling invasive species of plants, having archaeological surveys conducted and restoring historical sites.

Environment
11
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
12
Door County Housing Partnership Inc

The Door County Housing Partnership is creating a stable supply of permanently affordable housing for year-round residents to maintain the character, vibrancy, and diversity of the Door County community. Door County has an affordable…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hilton Head Island Deep Well Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Monmouth University Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyRegional Arts & Community C…School Parent OrganizationsDisability Housing & Suppor…Coastal & Waterway Conserva…Pet Rescue and Adoption
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr21%24%10–20yr18%16%20–35yr13%40%35–55yr9%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr21%14%10–20yr18%22%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr9%43%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
11%
956/9,016

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
17/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST VINCENTS ACADEMY — $30,500 · OtherST VINCENTS ACADEMYPOINT PLEASANT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $22,300 · OtherPOINT PLEASANT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHWAYNE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY INC — $18,298 · OtherWAYNE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY INCHONESDALE EMERGENCY PANTRY — $8,500 · OtherHONESDALE EMERGENCY PANTRYIndividual grant recipient — $8,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF EAST BROADTOP RR — $8,000 · OtherTHE WAYNE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATI — $6,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY — $6,000 · Other+29 more — $49,305 · Other+29 moreCOMMON GROUND ON THE HILL LTD — $38,750 · Arts & CultureCOMMON GROUND ON…+2 more — $2,000 · Arts & CultureMCDANIEL COLLEGE INC — $30,040 · EducationMCDANIEL COLL…MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC — $2,450 · EducationMONMOUTH UNIV…Honesdale Communities That Care Inc — $1,500 · EducationDaufuskie Community Farm — $10,560 · Food & NutritionST GREGORY'S PANTRY INC — $5,500 · Food & NutritionSANDALWOOD COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY — $4,500 · Food & NutritionHILTON HEAD ISLAND DEEP WELL PROJECT INC — $15,500 · EnvironmentSouth Carolina Coastal Conservation League Inc — $3,000 · EnvironmentSOUTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL LAW PROJECT INC — $1,000 · EnvironmentVICTIMS INTERVENTION PROGRAM — $12,500 · HealthWAYNE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,500 · Philanthropy
Other$156,903Arts & Culture$40,750Education$33,990Food & Nutrition$20,560Environment$19,500Health$12,500Philanthropy$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMON GROUND ON THE HILL LTD — $38,750 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetMCDANIEL COLLEGE INC — $30,040 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWAYNE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY INC — $18,298 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetHILTON HEAD ISLAND DEEP WELL PROJECT INC — $15,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetVICTIMS INTERVENTION PROGRAM — $12,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetST GREGORY'S PANTRY INC — $5,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetSANDALWOOD COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY — $4,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetDORFLINGER SUYDAM WILDLIFE SANCTUARY — $4,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSouth Carolina Coastal Conservation League Inc — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWAYNE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC — $2,450 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWayne County Family Center — $2,330 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHonesdale Communities That Care Inc — $1,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetALLAIRE VILLAGE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL LAW PROJECT INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COOPERAGE PROJECT — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDAUFUSKIE MARSH TACKY SOCIETY — $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWayne County YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN RESOURCES CENTER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMON GROUND ON THE HILL LTD
  • Who funds MCDANIEL COLLEGE INC
  • Who funds WAYNE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY INC
  • Who funds HILTON HEAD ISLAND DEEP WELL PROJECT INC
  • Who funds VICTIMS INTERVENTION PROGRAM
  • Who funds Daufuskie Community Farm
  • Who funds ST GREGORY'S PANTRY INC
  • Who funds SANDALWOOD COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds DORFLINGER SUYDAM WILDLIFE SANCTUARY
  • Who funds South Carolina Coastal Conservation League Inc
  • Who funds WAYNE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds Wayne County Family Center
  • Who funds Honesdale Communities That Care Inc
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WAYNE COUNTY PA INC
  • Who funds ALLAIRE VILLAGE INC
  • Who funds Billys New Hope Barn Inc
  • Who funds SOUTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL LAW PROJECT INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Honesdale National Bank FoundationPA22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Honesdale National Bank Foundation · The Grimm Foundation · The John & Helen Villaume Foundation · Hickory Hill Foundation · Community Foundation of the Lowcountry · William E Chatlos Foundation · Scranton Area Foundation Inc · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Van Horn Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • Common Ground On the Hill Ltd18% of income from government
  • Allaire Village Inc6% of income from government
  • Monmouth University Inc0% of income from government
  • Mcdaniel College Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Van Horn Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Van Horn Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph