Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Turk Family Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$305k
Granted FY2017
35
Grants FY2017
3
States reached
$35k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

74% of The Turk Family Foundation’s FY2018 grant dollars went to Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2018 names 36 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2017, the last year The Turk Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 24 organizations, $305k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

24
17
36
18

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172018.

Philanthropy$1.2MHuman Services$198kEducation$101kInternational$100kReligion$80kFood & Nutrition$64kYouth Development$48kHealth$30kOther$0
02FY2017 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k30 grants · $180k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $125k
$7,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIB$35,000
SERVING SENIORS$30,000
SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL$25,000
CONGREGATION BETH EL$20,000
LAWRENCE FAMILY JEWISH COMM$15,000
ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO$7,500
MEALS ON WHEELS SD$7,500
US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$7,500
JACOBS & CUSHMAN SD FOOD BANK$7,500
ANGELS FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY$7,500
CASA DE AMPARO$7,500
INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SERVICES$7,500
DAMON RUNYON CANCER RESEARCH$7,500
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION SD$7,500
FEEDING SAN DIEGO$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $138k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $8k → 11%ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $8k → 11%ANGELS FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY: $8k → 11%ANGELS FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY: $8k → 11%SAY SAN DIEGO: $5k → 11%SAY SAN DIEGO: $3k → 11%NORTH COUNTY LIFELINE: $8k → 11%NORTH COUNTY LIFELINE: $5k → 11%CASA DE AMPARO: $8k → 11%CASA DE AMPARO: $8k → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $8k → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 11%SERVING SENIORS: $30k → 11%SERVING SENIORS: $30k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$508k · 31 repeat orgs$213k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +47% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2017, 0 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2017 (too recent to call). Read against FY2017, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
32

Total granted

$508k
$213k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+47%

Still filing today

71%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $160k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionInternationalYouth DevelopmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $70k · revenue +24%
  • SS
    SERVING SENIORS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $60k · revenue +182%
  • FS
    FEEDING SAN DIEGO
    2× · 2017–2018 · $15k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • TS
    The Salk Institute for Biological Studiesgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +38%
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH EL
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • UD
    UC DAVIS
    one grant, 2018 · $18k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
2
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
3
Jewish Family Service of San Diego

Jewish family service is a client-centered, impact-driven organization working to build a stronger, healthier, more resilient san diego.

Human Services
4
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

5
California Western School of Law

California western school of law is an independent, aba/aals and wasc senior college and university commission (wscuc) accredited s.d. law school that prepares graduates for the practice of law through a carefully sequenced program of…

Education
6
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
7
Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank

The jacobs & cushman san diego food bank is the largest hunger-relief organization in san diego county. its mission is to provide nutritious food to people in need, advocate for the hungry, and educate the public about hunger-related…

Food & Nutrition
8
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

9
San Diego Volunteer Lawyer Program Inc

The mission of san diego volunteer lawyer program, inc. is to provide equal access to the justice system by serving as a bridge between indigent and other disadvantaged people in san diego county and the volunteer lawyers who are willing…

Social Science
10
San Diego Municipal Employees Assn

The san diego municipal employees association (sdmea) is dedicated to being a strong and effective advocate for san diego city employees. sdmea is united to improve employees' standard of living and promote their fair treatment by…

11
Dominican University of California

Our institutional mission is to educate and prepare students to be ethical leaders and socially responsible global citizens who incorporate the dominican values of study, reflection, community and service into their lives.

Education
12
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding San Diego and the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%3%<5yr15%0%5–10yr21%13%10–20yr19%20%20–35yr12%35%35–55yr12%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%1%<5yr15%0%5–10yr21%3%10–20yr19%75%20–35yr12%11%35–55yr12%10%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/40
the rest of the field
12%
4,248/34,904

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/38
Grantees still filing
36/38
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $1,178,294 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC+1 more — $7,500 · PhilanthropyLAWRENCE FAMILY JEWISH COMM — $30,000 · OtherLAWRENCE FAMILY JEWISH C…CONGREGATION BETH EL — $20,000 · OtherUC DAVIS — $17,500 · OtherMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION SD — $15,000 · OtherInterfaith Community Services Inc — $15,000 · OtherJACOBS & CUSHMAN SD FOOD BANK — $15,000 · OtherHILLEL OF SAN DIEGO — $15,000 · OtherBIG BROTHER BIG SISTER SD — $15,000 · OtherDAMON RUNYON CANCER RESEARCH — $15,000 · OtherSEACREST VILLAGE RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES — $15,000 · OtherMOISHE HOUSE — $15,000 · OtherSAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC — $15,000 · OtherThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $15,000 · Other+31 more — $188,960 · Other+31 moreSERVING SENIORS — $60,000 · Human ServicesANGELS FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY — $15,000 · Human ServicesCasa De Amparo — $15,000 · Human ServicesELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO — $15,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER — $12,500 · Human ServicesNORTH COUNTY LIFELINE INC DBA LIFELINE COMMUNITY SERVICES — $12,500 · Human ServicesSOCIAL ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH SAN DIEGO INC — $7,500 · Human ServicesThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $70,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $10,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $10,000 · InternationalMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT — $15,000 · EducationBROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL — $7,500 · EducationADELPHI UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · EducationTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · EducationPOINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY — $4,000 · EducationFEEDING SAN DIEGO — $15,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS-ON-WHEELS GREATER SAN DIEGO INC — $7,500 · Food & NutritionSAN DIEGO HUNGER COALITION — $5,000 · Food & NutritionThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies — $25,000 · Science & Tech
Philanthropy$1,185,794Other$406,460Human Services$137,500International$90,000Education$36,500Food & Nutrition$27,500Science & Tech$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $1,178,294 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSERVING SENIORS — $60,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANGELS FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY — $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCasa De Amparo — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetInterfaith Community Services Inc — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT — $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMOISHE HOUSE — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO — $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSAN DIEGO RESCUE MISSION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL OF SAN DIEGO — $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetKIDS INCLUDED TOGETHER — $12,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER — $12,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH COUNTY LIFELINE INC DBA LIFELINE COMMUNITY SERVICES — $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTARPAL — $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHEMOTHERAPY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetINDIVIDUAL & FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK — $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOCIAL ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH SAN DIEGO INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS-ON-WHEELS GREATER SAN DIEGO INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN LAW SCHOOL — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKITCHENS FOR GOOD — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUNGER COALITION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetADELPHI UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND CHANCE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOASTAL ROOTS FARM — $3,600 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNorthwestern University — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego FoundationCA30.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Sempra Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · Leichtag Foundation · Boys and Girls Aid Society of San Diego Ltd · Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Turk Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph