· Private foundation
The Tremblay Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k27 grants · $102k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $100k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Teton Science Schools | $60,000 |
| Marblehead Boosters Club | $20,000 |
| Grand Teton National Park Foundation | $20,000 |
| Bucknell University | $15,000 |
| Grace Chapel | $15,000 |
| Kripalu Center for Yoga & Health | $10,000 |
| Shriners Hospitals for Children | $10,000 |
| Teton County Search and Rescue | $10,000 |
| Teton Raptor Center | $7,500 |
| Goldthwait Reservation | $6,000 |
| Girls Inc of Lynn | $6,000 |
| Yankee Golden Retriever Rescue | $5,000 |
| Good Samaritan Mission | $5,000 |
| Bridger Teton Avalanche Center | $5,000 |
| Lower Cape Outreach Council | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
42 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TSTETON SCIENCE SCHOOLS INC6× · 2020–2025 · $170k · revenue +31%
GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2025 · $95k · revenue +313%
THE PINGREE SCHOOL INC5× · 2020–2024 · $67k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $15k
- ACART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGNone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +22%
- MCMALARIA CONSORTIUM US INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +648%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…
Overview - founded in boston by pioneering landscape architect and open space visionary charles eliot in 1891, the trustees is the nation's first and the commonwealth's largest conservation and preservation nonprofit.
The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Massachusetts Wonderfund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wyoming Wildlife Advocates. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TETON SCIENCE SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE PINGREE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Bucknell University ↗
- Who funds SHORE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds MARBLEHEAD BOOSTERS CLUB INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds WOLF HAVEN INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds LOWER CAPE OUTREACH COUNCILINC ↗
- Who funds YANKEE GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds TETON RAPTOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE UNITED STATES ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds GOLDTHWAIT RESERVATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE TURNING POINT INC ↗
- Who funds PEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE SHERMAN OAKS NURSERY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds KRIPALU CENTER FOR YOGA & HEALTH ↗
- Who funds ART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN ↗
- Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds MALARIA CONSORTIUM US INC ↗
- Who funds All Sentient Beings ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · Boston Foundation Inc · Essex County Community Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Nelson Family Foundation · The Coughlin Family Trust · Ac and Penney Hubbard Foundation Inc · The Brooks Foundation · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Tremblay Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Girls Incorporated of Boston and Lynn — 28% of income from government
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
- Lower Cape Outreach Councilinc — 6% of income from government
- Peabody Essex Museum Inc — 3% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
- Museum of Science — 0% of income from government
- Brooksby Village Inc — 0% of income from government
- Museum of Fine Arts — 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.