Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Treehouse Foundation of the Hudson Valley Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$9k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$100kHealth$64kArts & Culture$19kAnimals$2kReligion$1k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$750
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUNSHINE KIDS$1,850
CENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD$1,000
RYAN MCELROY CHILDREN'S CANCER FUND$1,000
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION$750
FAMILY SERVICES$750
GRACE SMITH HOUSE$750
CHILDRENS HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE$750
THE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION OF ASTOR$750
THE ART EFFECT$500
CENTER FOR SPECTRUM SERVICES$300
FAMILY OF WOODSTOCK INC$300
BLUE PATH SERVICE DOGS INC$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%GRACE SMITH HOUSE: $4k → 9%CHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $4k → 9%CHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $3k → 9%GRACE SMITH HOUSE: $3k → 9%CHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $3k → 9%CHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $3k → 9%GRACE SMITH HOUSE: $3k → 9%GRACE SMITH HOUSE: $3k → 9%CHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $2k → 9%GRACE SMITH HOUSE: $2k → 9%GRACE SMITH HOUSE: $2k → 9%CHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $2k → 9%GRACE SMITH HOUSE: $1k → 9%GRACE SMITH HOUSE: $1k → 9%CHILDRENS HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $1k → 9%CHILDRENS HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $1k → 9%GRACE SMITH HOUSE: $750 → 9%CHILDRENS HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $750 → 9%ANGELS OF LIGHT: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$184k · 14 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +98% since the first grant, against +75% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
1

Total granted

$184k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
+75%

Still filing today

64%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SUNSHINE KIDS FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +18%
  • GS
    GRACE SMITH HOUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +65%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $19k · revenue +180%

Funded once

  • AO
    ANGELS OF LIGHT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +75%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chdfs Inc

Provide intensive in-home support to developmentally and emotionally disturbed children and adolescents and their families.

Youth Development
2
Julia Dyckman Andrus Memorial Inc

Through our proven care models, innovative programs, professional training, influential research and determined advocacy, andrus aims to be a national leader in shaping policies and practices that prevent and overcome the effect of…

Unclassified
3
Family Services of Westchester Inc

Family services of westchester offers a broad range of social and mental health services to strengthen and support families, children and individuals at every stages of the life cycle from infancy to adulthood.

—
4
The Child Center of Ny Inc

The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.

—
5
Center for Developmental Disabilities

The center's mission is to help children and adults with differing abilities achieve their dreams by overcoming barriers to living, working, learning & enjoying recreational opportunities in the community of their choice.

Human Services
6
Little Flower Children Family Services of New York

Little flower is committed to improving the well-being of the children, families, and individuals with developmental disabilities across nyc and long island so they can reach their full potential. little flower transforms caring into…

Human Services
7
St Vincent's Services Inc

For over 150 years, st. vincent's services, inc. (d/b/a heartshare st. vincent's services) has been a symbol of hope, compassion, and strength for vulnerable and under-resourced communities in new york city. (see on schedule o)

Human Services
8
Cardinal Mccloskey School and Home for Children

The organization strives to protect, empower and promote independence for at-risk children and families and those with developmental disabilities through quality community based services.

—
9
Health Care & Rehabilitation Services of Southeastern Vt Inc

Hcrs' mission is to provide creative, collaborative, and compassionate health care services that are responsive to the needs of our communities.

Health
10
Nysarc Inc New York City Chapter

We are committed to helping people with intellectual (cont. on schedule o) and developmental disabilities to live full lives.

Human Services
11
Abbott House

Founded in 1963, abbott house builds lasting foundations under children, families, and adults with complex needs. we support nearly 2,500 individuals which includes, children in foster care, unaccompanied immigrant children, adults with…

Human Services
12
Mid-Island Y Jewish Community Center in

Provide vital services & foster jewish identity, personal growth, family strength and community. the mid-island y jcc is open to everyone in the community serving individuals of all ages, abilities, and challenges.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Grace Smith House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RYAN MCELROY CHILDREN'S CANCER FUND: $21,100 · OtherRYAN MCELROY CHILDREN'S CANCER FUNDCENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILD: $19,100 · OtherCENTER FOR THE PREVENTION OF CHILDMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION: $18,850 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATIONFAMILY SERVICES INC: $15,850 · OtherFAMILY SERVICES INCTHE ART EFFECT: $11,400 · OtherTHE ART EFFECTASTOR SERVICES FOR CHILDREN: $7,200 · OtherASTOR SERVICES FOR CHILDRENCenter for Spectrum Services: $3,300 · OtherGRACE SMITH HOUSE INC: $18,850 · Human ServicesGRACE SMITH HOUSE INCCHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE INC: $18,850 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME OF POUG…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE SUNSHINE KIDS FOUNDATION: $23,550 · HealthTHE SUNSHINE KIDS…FAMILY OF WOODSTOCK INC: $5,300 · HealthFAMILY OF WOODSTO…THE CHILDRENS FOUNDATION OF ASTOR: $11,650 · PhilanthropyTHE ART EFFECT OF THE HUDSON VALLEY INC: $7,200 · Arts & CultureBLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC: $1,500 · Animals
Other$96,800Human Services$38,700Health$28,850Philanthropy$11,650Arts & Culture$7,200Animals$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SUNSHINE KIDS FOUNDATION: $23,550 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGRACE SMITH HOUSE INC: $18,850 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE INC: $18,850 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES INC: $15,850 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS FOUNDATION OF ASTOR: $11,650 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetTHE ART EFFECT OF THE HUDSON VALLEY INC: $7,200 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY OF WOODSTOCK INC: $5,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Spectrum Services: $3,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC: $1,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANGELS OF LIGHT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SUNSHINE KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GRACE SMITH HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDRENS FOUNDATION OF ASTOR ↗
  • Who funds THE ART EFFECT OF THE HUDSON VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY OF WOODSTOCK INC ↗
  • Who funds Center for Spectrum Services ↗
  • Who funds BLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGELS OF LIGHT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley IncNY21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc · Ulster Savings Charitable Foundation · The Dyson Foundation · Vassar College · United Way of the Dutchess-Orange Region Inc · The Ascienzo Family Foundation · Henry L Kimelman Family Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Treehouse Foundation of the Hudson Valley Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Treehouse Foundation of the Hudson Valley Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Treehouse Foundation of the Hudson Valley Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Treehouse Foundation of the Hudson Valley Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Treehouse Foundation of the Hudson Valley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph