Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Trammell Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$146k
Granted FY2022
13
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$12k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Trammell Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year The Trammell Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $146k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
17
5
18
6
19
8
20
9
21
9
22
0
23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Philanthropy$3.4MEducation$530kHealth$96kRecreation & Sports$90kAnimals$32kArts & Culture$25kReligion$12kOther$0
02FY2022 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $132k
$12,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTMONT COLLEGE$12,000
UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FNDTN$12,000
SMU DEDMAN SCHOOL OF LAW$12,000
THE MENNINGER CLINIC FOUNDATION$12,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$12,000
MHS BOOSTER CLUB$12,000
RED BUCKET EQUINE RESCUE$12,000
HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL FDTN$12,000
HIGHLAND PARK EDUCATION FOUNDATION$12,000
WELLESLEY COLLEGE$12,000
CHRIST THE KING PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$12,000
EMERGE$7,000
TUFTS UNIVERSITY$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 13% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WELLESLEY COLLEGE: $12k → 7%RED BUCKET EQUINE RESCUE: $12k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $16k → 14%WESTMONT COLLEGE: $16k → 14%HIGHLAND PARK EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $12k → 14%YELLOWSTONE ACADEMY: $11k → 16%VANGUARD CHARITABLE FUND: $1.2M → 7%ST JOSEPH SCHOOL: $16k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FNDTN: $12k → 18%WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 12%RED BUCKET EQUINE RESCUE: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $16k → 14%WESTMONT COLLEGE: $16k → 14%HIGHLAND PARK EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%RIVER OAKS BAPTIST SCHOOL: $16k → 16%VANGUARD CHARITABLE FUND: $1.1M → 7%ST JOSEPH SCHOOL: $16k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FNDTN: $11k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $12k → 14%WESTMONT COLLEGE: $12k → 14%HIGHLAND PARK EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%RIVER OAKS BAPTIST SCHOOL: $11k → 16%VANGUARD CHARITABLE FUND: $605k → 7%ST JOSEPH SCHOOL: $11k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FNDTN: $10k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $11k → 14%WESTMONT COLLEGE: $11k → 14%HIGHLAND PARK EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%ST JOHN'S SCHOOL: $16k → 16%VANGUARD CHARITABLE FUND: $534k → 7%ST JOSEPH SCHOOL: $11k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $10k → 14%WESTMONT COLLEGE: $11k → 14%HIGHLAND PARK EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%ST JOHN'S SCHOOL: $16k → 16%VANGUARD CHARITABLE FUND: $18k → 7%ST JOSEPH SCHOOL: $10k → 9%WESTMONT COLLEGE: $10k → 14%ST JOHN'S SCHOOL: $11k → 16%ST JOHN'S SCHOOL: $11k → 16%CHRIST THE KING PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $12k → 16%MHS BOOSTER CLUB: $16k → 16%MHS BOOSTER CLUB: $16k → 16%MHS BOOSTER CLUB: $12k → 16%MHS BOOSTER CLUB: $11k → 16%EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL: $11k → 16%HOUSTON BALLET: $20k → 16%THE MENNINGER CLINIC FOUNDATION: $12k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
MA
RI
CA
VA
TN
MS
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$658k · 15 repeat orgs$74k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2022, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
4

Total granted

$658k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+15%

Still filing today

53%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
EducationAnimalsRecreation & SportsHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WESTMONT COLLEGE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $75k · revenue +38%
  • SJ
    St John's School
    5× · 2017–2021 · $63k · revenue +130%
  • HP
    HIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $59k · revenue +588%

Funded once

  • YELLOWSTONE ACADEMY INC DBA YELLOWSTONE SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue -7%
  • Washington and Lee University
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +15%
  • EH
    EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $11k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
2
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
5
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
6
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
7
University of Lynchburg

The mission of the University is to inspire independent thinkers who become trustworthy, effective leaders that shape caring communities. The vision of the University of Lynchburg is to cultivate a world that is innovative, authentic, and…

Education
8
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
9
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
10
Hampden-Sydney College

Since 1775, the mission of Hampden-Sydney College has been to form good men and good citizens in an atmosphere of sound learning.

Education
11
Harvey Mudd College

HMC seeks to educate engineers, scientists, and mathematicians well versed in all of these areas and in the humanities, social sciences and the arts so that they may assume leadership in their fields with a clear understanding of the…

Education
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wellesley College and the most unlike its peers is Red Bucket Equine Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $3,415,930 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAMHOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL FDTN — $73,886 · OtherHOUSTON ME…MHS BOOSTER CLUB — $63,886 · OtherMHS BOOSTE…ST JOSEPH SCHOOL — $62,886 · OtherST JOSEPH …St John's School — $62,886 · OtherSt John's …UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN — $47,261 · OtherUNIVERSITY…RIVER OAKS BAPTIST SCHOOL — $26,261 · OtherRIVER OAKS…HOUSTON BALLET — $25,000 · OtherHOUSTON BA…+3 more — $35,000 · Other+3 moreWESTMONT COLLEGE — $74,886 · EducationWESTMONT …UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $63,886 · EducationUNIVERSIT…HIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $58,636 · EducationHIGHLAND …Trustees of Tufts College — $43,261 · EducationTrustees …UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION — $32,640 · EducationUNIVERSIT…Vanderbilt University — $20,625 · EducationVanderbil…Southern Methodist University — $12,000 · EducationWellesley College — $12,000 · Education+2 more — $22,000 · Education+2 moreRED BUCKET EQUINE RESCUE — $32,000 · AnimalsTHE MENNINGER CLINIC FOUNDATION — $22,000 · HealthNORTHEAST HARBOR SAILING SCHOOL — $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Philanthropy$3,415,930Other$397,066Education$339,934Animals$32,000Health$22,000Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $3,415,930 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESTMONT COLLEGE — $74,886 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $63,886 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSt John's School — $62,886 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $58,636 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $43,261 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION — $32,640 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRED BUCKET EQUINE RESCUE — $32,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetTHE MENNINGER CLINIC FOUNDATION — $22,000 over 2y, 46% of budgetVanderbilt University — $20,625 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Methodist University — $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWellesley College — $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYELLOWSTONE ACADEMY INC DBA YELLOWSTONE SCHOOLS — $11,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWashington and Lee University — $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEAST HARBOR SAILING SCHOOL — $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM
  • Who funds WESTMONT COLLEGE
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds St John's School
  • Who funds HIGHLAND PARK ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION
  • Who funds RED BUCKET EQUINE RESCUE
  • Who funds THE MENNINGER CLINIC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University
  • Who funds Wellesley College
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE ACADEMY INC DBA YELLOWSTONE SCHOOLS
  • Who funds Washington and Lee University
  • Who funds NORTHEAST HARBOR SAILING SCHOOL

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Trammell Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 13%
  • Trustees of Tufts College13% of income from government
  • Wellesley College1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Trammell Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Trammell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph