Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Tombros Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$485k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$387k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Education$2.3MRecreation & Sports$443kHealth$121kArts & Culture$115kScience & Tech$83kInternational$30kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
  • $250k+1 grant · $387k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Penn State University$387,000
One Mind$65,000
Discovery Space of Central Pennsylvania$15,000
Hospital for special surgery$10,000
Special Olympics Pennsylvania$6,000
Rofeh Cholim Cancer Society Inc$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Nurturing Minds Inc: $15k → 8%Special Olympics Pennsylvania: $7k → 7%Deer Valley YMCA Family Camp: $30k → 14%Discovery Space of Central Pennsylvania Inc: $30k → 16%One Mind: $65k → 9%Hospital for special surgery: $12k → 17%Rofeh Cholim Cancer Society Inc: $2k → 20%Stamford EMS Inc: $10k → 22%Bridge to a cure: $22k → 9%Saint Catherine Center for Special Needs: $1k → 9%Karli Short Better Tomorrow Foundation: $3k → 7%BPS Foundation: $225k → 13%Mental Health Collaborative: $5k → 8%Special Olympics Pennsylvania: $7k → 7%Deer Valley YMCA Family Camp: $20k → 14%Success with Honor: $24k → 16%One Mind: $2k → 9%Hospital for special surgery: $10k → 17%Bridge to a cure: $5k → 9%Greens ledge light Preservation Society Inc: $25k → 9%BPS Foundation: $60k → 13%Special Olympics Pennsylvania: $7k → 7%Discovery Space of Central Pennsylvania: $15k → 16%Hospital for special surgery: $10k → 17%Greens ledge light Preservation Society Inc: $25k → 9%Special Olympics Pennsylvania: $6k → 7%Discovery Space of Central Pennsylvania: $10k → 16%Hospital for special surgery: $10k → 17%Greens ledge light Preservation Society Inc: $10k → 9%Mount Nittany Health Foundation: $7k → 16%Americares Free Clinic Inc: $25k → 9%Discovery Space of Central Pennsylvania Inc: $3k → 16%Penn State University: $415k → 16%Penn State University: $552k → 16%Penn State University: $450k → 16%Penn State University: $387k → 16%Penn State Dance Marathon: $26k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
NV
PA
NJ
CT
CA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.0M · 12 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
14

Total granted

$3.0M
$128k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+21%

Still filing today

58%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BF
    BPS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $285k · revenue +194%
  • GREENS LEDGE LIGHT PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $110k · revenue +16%
  • DS
    DISCOVERY SPACE OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $83k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • PS
    Penn State Dance Marathon
    one grant, 2022 · $26k
  • AF
    AMERICARES FREE CLINICS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +28%
  • SW
    SUCCESS WITH HONOR
    one grant, 2023 · $24k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stanley M Marks Blood Cancer Research Fund

The stanley m. marks blood cancer research fund is a pennsylvania non- profit corporation dedicated to supporting the upmc hillman cancer center, which develops highly innovative research aimed at new and more effective therapies for…

Health
2
Connecticut Sports Management Group

To promote and reinforce the olympic spirit on competition that values sportsmanship, effort, and achievement and to motivate personal development in physical fitness and health through attainable goals.

Recreation & Sports
3
The Center for Medical Technology Policy Inc

To develop a health care system where patients, clinicians, health care policymakers, and payers have the evidence they need to make informed health decisions.

4
Fox Chase Cancer Center Foundation

To prevail over cancer, marshaling heart and mind in bold scientific discovery, pioneering prevention and compassionate care.

Health
5
Central Pennsylvania Clinic- a Medical Home for Special Children & Adults

Diagnosis and treatment of, and providing primary and subspecialty care for special children and adults with genetic diseases.

Health
6
The Pennsylvania Pink Zone

This organization promotes cancer awareness to unite central pennsylvania in the fight against breast cancer by mobilizing resources to improve lives in the community and empower survivors through year-long efforts to raise funds critical…

Environment
7
The Penn Club of New York Inc

The penn club of new york has been established to encourage and cultivate free interchange, social activity and good fellowship among alumni, faculty, staff, students and friends of the university of pennsylvania and to assist and promote…

8
Breathe Pennsylvania

Breathe pennsylvania's mission is to empower western pennsylvanians to breathe better and live healthier through education and awareness of lung health in our community.

Health
9
Connecticut Cancer Foundation Inc

To provide funds to benefit families affected by cancer and to support cancer research and education.

10
Lancaster General Health Foundation

The lancaster general health foundation is organized and operated to benefit, perform the functions of, or carry out the purposes of members of the healthcare system of lancaster general health, a non-profit corporation described in…

Philanthropy
11
Central Atlantic Collegiate Conference Inc

The mission of the conference is to enhance intercollegiate competition among its member institutions and to focus on the welfare of the student athlete. the conference and its members are dedicated to upholding the highest standards of…

Education
12
Pennsylvania Breast Cancer Coalition

The pa breast cancer coalition represents, supports, and serves breast cancer survivors and their families in pa through educational programming, legislative advocacy, and breast cancer research grants. the pbcc is a statewide non-profit…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Olympics Pennsylvania Inc and the most unlike its peers is Karli Short Better Tomorrow Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Penn State University — $2,263,000 · OtherPenn State UniversityBPS FOUNDATION — $285,000 · OtherBPS FOUNDATION+14 more — $341,500 · Other+14 moreGREENS LEDGE LIGHT PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC — $110,100 · Arts & CultureDISCOVERY SPACE OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA INC — $82,600 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $5,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICARES FREE CLINICS INC — $25,000 · HealthSTAMFORD EMS INC — $10,000 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIVE INC — $5,000 · HealthNURTURING MINDS INC — $30,000 · EducationKARLI SHORT BETTER TOMORROW FOUNDATION — $3,000 · EducationPENN STATE WOMEN'S VOLLEYBALL BOOSTER CLUB INC — $6,000 · Recreation & SportsROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC — $2,000 · PhilanthropyPLAY FOR PINK INC — $500 · Crime & Legal
Other$2,889,500Arts & Culture$197,700Health$40,000Education$33,000Recreation & Sports$6,000Philanthropy$2,000Crime & Legal$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBPS FOUNDATION — $285,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetGREENS LEDGE LIGHT PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC — $110,100 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetDISCOVERY SPACE OF CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA INC — $82,600 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetNITTANY LION WRESTLING CLUB — $42,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC — $34,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNURTURING MINDS INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICARES FREE CLINICS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPIVOTAL MOMENTS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSTAMFORD EMS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetPENN STATE WOMEN'S VOLLEYBALL BOOSTER CLUB INC — $6,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH COLLABORATIVE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY PRINTMAKING — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY11.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Tombros Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph