Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Tomblin Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$152k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$280kArts & Culture$197kCivil Rights$127kHealth$116kPhilanthropy$101kHousing & Shelter$86kEnvironment$59kYouth Development$57kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $120k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOME$25,000
RAICES$22,500
FULL CIRCLE PROGRAM$20,200
FOSTER ANGELS OF CEN TX$20,000
LONESTAR LEGACY$12,500
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$10,000
KUT RADIO$10,000
INDIGENOUS CULTURES INSTITUTE$8,000
AUSTIN ALLIES$5,000
TEXSAR$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,500
JUNETEENTH FOUNDATION$2,500
TEXAS STATE UNIV ATHLETICS$2,500
CYCLE MOVEMENT$1,750
UNIV OF TEXAS LAW SCHOOL FOUNDATION$1,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LIGHTER LOADS ATX: $5k → 6%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $200 → 20%HIMALAYAN STOVE PROJECT: $5k → 18%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $5k → 10%LEARNING ALLY: $1k → 11%THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
IA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
NM
KS
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of The Tomblin Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 70% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 64%.

The Tomblin Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$995k · 32 repeat orgs$147k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
41

Total granted

$995k
$121k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+21%

Still filing today

59%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LL
    LONESTAR LEGACY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $95k · revenue +28%
  • IC
    INDIGENOUS CULTURES INSTITUTE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $68k · revenue +19%
  • FC
    FULL CIRCLE PROGRAM INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $50k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • SS
    STEM SCHOOL & ACADEMY
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • PF
    PARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +63%
  • TL
    THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHONA SOCIETY
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
2
Texas Trees Foundation

The mission of texas trees foundation is to improve the health of cities and people through the transformative power of trees.

—
3
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
4
Cuenca Los Ojos

Cuenca los ojos works to preserve and restore the biodiversity of the us/mexican borderlands through land protection, habitat restoration and wildlife reintroduction.

Environment
5
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
6
Colorado Cattlemen's Agricultural Land Trust

Conserving colorado's western heritage and working landscapes for the benefit of future generations.

Food & Nutrition
7
Conservation Legacy

Conservation legacy engages future leaders who protect, restore, and enhance our nation's lands through community-based service.in 2024, conservation legacy engaged 2,524 participants who completed over 1.5 million service hours on public…

Youth Development
8
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
9
Uatx

Uatx is a nonprofit dedicated to building a liberal arts university committed to freedom of inquiry, freedom of conscience, and civil discourse. to maintain these principles, the university will be fiercely independent financially,…

Education
10
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
11
Parks and Wildlife Foundation of Texas

Texas Parks and Wildlife Foundation (TPWF) is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization thatadvances Texas proud outdoor traditions through meaningful, high-impact programs,partnerships, and a wide range of projects that conserve and enhance our…

Environment
12
Colorado Open Lands

Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Coastal Conservation Association; the most unlike its peers is Paul Basch Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/48
Grantees still filing
33/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOSTER ANGELS OF CEN TX: $179,000 · OtherFOSTER ANGELS OF CEN TXHOME: $68,109 · OtherHOMEFAMILY FOR LIFE: $45,700 · OtherFAMILY FOR LIFEIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $42,740 · OtherIndividual grant recipientADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN CASA: $28,000 · OtherTHE WILL THRIVE FOUNDATION: $26,000 · Other+55 more: $222,350 · Other+55 moreREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $91,500 · Civil RightsREFUGEE & IM…CASA of Central Texas Inc: $35,000 · Civil RightsCASA of Cent…JANE'S DUE PROCESS INC: $5,000 · Civil RightsINDIGENOUS CULTURES INSTITUTE: $67,500 · Arts & CultureINDIGENOUS C…PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $33,500 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC BROAD…DENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $21,000 · Arts & CultureDENVER CENTE…+1 more: $2,300 · Arts & CultureLONESTAR LEGACY: $94,511 · PhilanthropyLONESTAR L…LITTLETON PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $10,620 · PhilanthropyLITTLETON …+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyFULL CIRCLE PROGRAM INC: $50,200 · HealthSOBRIETY HOUSE INC: $18,000 · Health+1 more: $1,800 · HealthAUSTIN ALLIES: $30,500 · Youth DevelopmentChampions Off the Field: $14,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOLORADO HIGH SCHOOL CYCLING LEAGUE: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentSan Marcos River Foundation: $25,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,500 · EnvironmentCOASTAL CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $1,000 · Environment
Other$656,899Civil Rights$131,500Arts & Culture$124,300Philanthropy$106,131Health$70,000Youth Development$47,500Environment$29,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLONESTAR LEGACY: $94,511 over 9y, 17% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $91,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetINDIGENOUS CULTURES INSTITUTE: $67,500 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetFULL CIRCLE PROGRAM INC: $50,200 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCASA of Central Texas Inc: $35,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $33,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN ALLIES: $30,500 over 5y, 11% of budgetSan Marcos River Foundation: $25,000 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetDENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $19,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOBRIETY HOUSE INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetChampions Off the Field: $14,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN YOUTHWORKS: $13,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLETON PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $10,620 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetPARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ST FRANCIS CENTER: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAUL BASCH MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCLIFFORD ANTONE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget5280 HIGH SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJANE'S DUE PROCESS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLucky Bikes: $4,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE WORD AT WORK: $4,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND WIND FUND INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOLORADO HIGH SCHOOL CYCLING LEAGUE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetANASTASIS ACADEMY: $2,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOWN YOUR OWN UNIVERSE: $2,300 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH CLINIC OF PASCO INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF THE ROCKIES: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Texas Law School Foundation: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLearning Ally Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTBLUE CHARITIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAPPY DOGGO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOASTAL CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAustin Wildlife Rescue: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROSEDALE FOUNDATION INC: $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LONESTAR LEGACY ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds INDIGENOUS CULTURES INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds FULL CIRCLE PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA of Central Texas Inc ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN ALLIES ↗
  • Who funds San Marcos River Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds SOBRIETY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Champions Off the Field ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN YOUTHWORKS ↗
  • Who funds LITTLETON PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ST FRANCIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds PAUL BASCH MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CLIFFORD ANTONE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTER LOADS ATX ↗
  • Who funds 5280 HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds JANE'S DUE PROCESS INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds TEXSAR INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Denver FoundationCO20.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Caring for Denver Foundation · JP's Peace Love & Happiness Foundation · Jacob and Terese Hershey Foundation · The Anschutz Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Janus Henderson Foundation · The Cynthia & George Mitchell Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Tomblin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Tomblin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Learning Ally Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tomblin Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph