Skip to content

Massachusetts · Private foundation

The Tom & Elena Matlack Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$34k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
12
Grants FY2024
11
Organizations funded FY2023
27%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
10 to 18
FY2019 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
4
Total assets, FY2024
$932k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 27% of the organizations The Tom & Elena Matlack Charitable Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 33% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving11$29k27%
FY202311$33k27%
FY202217$90k53%
FY202112$28k58%
FY202010$28k60%
FY201918$45kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$107kYouth Development$61kHealth$39kArts & Culture$22kRecreation & Sports$18kHousing & Shelter$6kHuman Services$5kInternational$3kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
MT
IL
NY
MA
CT
RI
DC

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 31 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 15 recipients with no EIN on record ($51k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Tom & Elena Matlack Charitable Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc: $59,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWesleyan University: $56,462 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPerkins School for the Blind: $32,532 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc: $10,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPine Street Inn Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHeroes and Horses Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTrustees of Thayer Academy Inc: $4,586 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBoston Ballet Inc: $4,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Fund for Unicef: $2,814 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBoston Arts Academy Foundation Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Repertory Theatre Co Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIsabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRar-Ma Inc: $1,908 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBrookline Food Pantry Inc: $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: $1,647 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBatten Disease Research: $1,500 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetDexter Southfield Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChange Summer Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRosie's Place Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWestport Land Conservation Trust Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEllie Fund Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetImpact Melanoma Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNamastay Sober Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLungevity Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKidspirit Inc: $258 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe B Fund: $250 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSquashbusters Inc: $206 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPositive Tracks Inc: $105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 30.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA21.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Fiduciary Charitable Foundation Dba Fiduciary Trust Charitable · Fidelity Foundation · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Tom & Elena Matlack Charitable Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Tom & Elena Matlack Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Tom & Elena Matlack Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Tom & Elena Matlack Charitable Foundation

How much does The Tom & Elena Matlack Charitable Foundation give?
The Tom & Elena Matlack Charitable Foundation reported 12 grants totaling $34,273 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 10 and 18 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2023.
What does The Tom & Elena Matlack Charitable Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (40%), Youth Development (23%), Health (15%).
Who are The Tom & Elena Matlack Charitable Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2024: Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc ($60k), Wesleyan University ($56k), Perkins School for the Blind ($33k).
Does The Tom & Elena Matlack Charitable Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 27% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Tom & Elena Matlack Charitable Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Tom & Elena Matlack Charitable Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Boston Foundation Inc, Eastern Bank Foundation, Fiduciary Charitable Foundation Dba Fiduciary Trust Charitable.
Where is The Tom & Elena Matlack Charitable Foundation based?
The Tom & Elena Matlack Charitable Foundation is based in MA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tom & Elena Matlack’s filings →

More from the funding graph