Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Tina and Calvin Tyler Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$337k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$310k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$2.3MHealth$291kHuman Services$60kYouth Development$45kFood & Nutrition$30kPublic Benefit$30kCrime & Legal$10kPhilanthropy$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $250k+1 grant · $310k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$310,000
ENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY$10,000
THE LINKS FOUNDATION$10,000
HIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER$5,000
BISON IN VEGAS HBCU ALUMNI GROUP$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LEGACY LADIES INC: $5k → 14%LEGACY LADIES INC: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NV
NJ
CA
CO
MD
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 68% of The Tina and Calvin Tyler Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Tina and Calvin Tyler Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 11 repeat orgs$337k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
17

Total granted

$2.4M
$315k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+19%

Still filing today

73%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +2%
  • SR
    ST ROSE DOMINICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2024 · $185k · revenue +31%
  • FI
    FOUNDATIONS INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $75k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • EB
    EPSILON BOULE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • SR
    ST ROSE DOMINCAN REPUBLIC HEALTH FO
    one grant, 2022 · $75k
  • SF
    SACRAMENTO FOOD BANK & FAMILY SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Temple University Law Foundation

The Temple University Law Foundation was created to assist needy law students in completing their studies. The Law Foundation provides funding for scholarships, work study matching funds, graduation prizes and loan repayment assistance for…

Education
2
Florida Gulf Coast University Foundation Inc

To advance florida gulf coast university and its students by promoting the institution, securing philanthropy to support the needs of the university, managing and administering assets with a long term perspective, and providing resources…

Education
3
Latino Corporate Directors Education Foundation

The latino corporate directors education foundation (lcdef) is the affiliated foundation of lcda. together with lcda, the foundation is committed to paving the way for the next generation of us corporate directors. its strategic priority…

Education
4
Portland State University Foundation

Portland state university foundation is responsible for raising and managing private resources to advance psu's priorities and mission to be a leading urban university.

—
5
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
6
Collegiate Foundations
Philanthropy
7
The Leadership Foundation

The leadership foundation, inc. (the foundation), established in 1990, is the mechanism by which iwf members advance the next generation of women leaders. the foundation accelerates the careers of top-performing women by offering…

—
8
Los Angeles Mission College Foundation

The specific purpose for which the los angeles mission college foundation has been established is to advance the college's educational and cultural goals.

—
9
Miami University Foundation

Support of miami university

Education
10
President's Legacy Scholarship Fund of the Ufcw
—
11
Minnesota State College Southeast Foundation

Minnesota state college southeast foundation assists the college in achieving excellence in technical education for employment by developing financial and community resources for students, employers, and communities within our service area.

Education
12
University Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Links Foundation Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Theta Phi Lambda Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,936,000 · EducationTHE MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC+4 more: $23,000 · EducationEPSILON BOULE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · OtherEPSILON BOULE EDUCATIO…Baltimore City College Alumni Association: $100,000 · OtherBaltimore City College…FOUNDATIONS INC: $75,000 · OtherFOUNDATIONS INCST ROSE DOMINCAN REPUBLIC HEALTH FO: $75,000 · OtherST ROSE DOMINCAN REPUB…SACRAMENTO FOOD BANK & FAMILY SERVICES: $30,000 · OtherSACRAMENTO FOOD BANK &…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $30,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBCASA FOUNDATION OF LAS VEGAS: $25,000 · OtherHIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER: $20,000 · Other+13 more: $84,950 · Other+13 moreST ROSE DOMINICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $185,000 · HealthNATIONAL MEDICAL FELLOWSHIPS INC: $30,750 · HealthHIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterLas Vegas Metropolitan PD Foundation: $10,000 · Crime & LegalLEGACY LADIES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesHISTORIC OVIEDO COLORED SCHOOLS MUS: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$1,959,000Other$539,950Health$215,750Housing & Shelter$15,000Crime & Legal$10,000Human Services$10,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,936,000 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetST ROSE DOMINICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $185,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBaltimore City College Alumni Association: $100,000 over 4y, 24% of budgetFOUNDATIONS INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL MEDICAL FELLOWSHIPS INC: $30,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSACRAMENTO FOOD BANK & FAMILY SERVICES: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LINKS FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $14,950 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLas Vegas Metropolitan PD Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEGACY LADIES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY OF BALTIMORE CITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetClark Atlanta University Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHISTORIC OVIEDO COLORED SCHOOLS MUS: $5,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST ROSE DOMINICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Baltimore City College Alumni Association ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MEDICAL FELLOWSHIPS INC ↗
  • Who funds SACRAMENTO FOOD BANK & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds HIBISCUS CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LINKS FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Las Vegas Metropolitan PD Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY LADIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY OF BALTIMORE CITY ↗
  • Who funds Clark Atlanta University Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC OVIEDO COLORED SCHOOLS MUS ↗
  • Who funds Theta Phi Lambda Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Tina and Calvin Tyler Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Tina and Calvin Tyler Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • The Morgan State University Foundation Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Hibiscus Children's Center Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Tina and Calvin Tyler Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Tina and Calvin Tyler Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tina and Calvin Tyler Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph