Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Three Springs Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$69k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0177% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$125kEducation$53kAnimals$47kHealth$30kPublic Safety & Disaster$17kArts & Culture$10kCrime & Legal$6kFood & Nutrition$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL OREGON VETERANS RANCH$15,000
SAVING GRACE$15,000
CROOK COUNTY FOUNDATION$5,000
LITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER$5,000
BRIGHTSIDE ANIMAL SHELTER$5,000
HUMAN SOCIETY OF THE OCHOCOS$5,000
CROOK COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE$5,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$5,000
USO$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
NATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SAVING GRACE: $30k → 10%SAVING GRACE: $15k → 10%SAVING GRACE: $10k → 10%SAVING GRACE: $5k → 10%SAVING GRACE: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$294k · 14 repeat orgs$100 to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
1

Total granted

$294k
$100

Still filing today

43%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsAnimalsArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SG
    SAVING GRACE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $65k · revenue +3%
  • CC
    CROOK COUNTY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $30k · revenue +69%
  • LITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER
    5× · 2021–2025 · $24k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • YR
    YAQUINA RIVER MUSEUM OF ART LTD
    one grant, 2021 · $100
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
5/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRAL OREGON VETERANS RANCH: $60,000 · OtherCENTRAL OREGON VETERANS RANCHBRIGHTSIDE ANIMAL SHELTER: $25,000 · OtherBRIGHTSIDE ANIMAL SHELTERCROOK COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE: $17,000 · OtherCROOK COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUEIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUSO: $7,500 · OtherHORSES OF HOPE: $6,000 · OtherNATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL: $5,750 · Other+3 more: $6,950 · OtherSAVING GRACE: $65,000 · Human ServicesSAVING GRACECROOK COUNTY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Community ImprovementCROOK COUN…LITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $23,500 · Recreation & SportsHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $23,000 · EducationHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE OCHOCOS: $22,000 · AnimalsLINCOLN CITY CULTURAL CENTER: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$143,200Human Services$65,000Community Improvement$30,000Recreation & Sports$23,500Education$23,000Animals$22,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAVING GRACE: $65,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetCENTRAL OREGON VETERANS RANCH: $60,000 over 4y, 9.2% of budgetCROOK COUNTY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetLITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $23,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $23,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE OCHOCOS: $22,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetLINCOLN CITY CULTURAL CENTER: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAVING GRACE ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL OREGON VETERANS RANCH ↗
  • Who funds CROOK COUNTY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE BIT THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE OCHOCOS ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN CITY CULTURAL CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Three Springs Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Three Springs Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 45%
  • Saving Grace: 48% of income from government
  • Central Oregon Veterans Ranch: 45% of income from government
  • Lincoln City Cultural Center: 4% of income from government
  • Crook County Foundation: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Three Springs’ filings →

More from the funding graph