Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

The Thoracic Surgery Foundation

The mission of tsf is to advance heart and lung health for all.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$1.8MEducation$445kInternational$190kPhilanthropy$143k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 12 grants below total $437,200 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,833,233 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,396,033 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $367k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$35,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUKE UNIVERSITY$70,000
PERUVIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY$37,200
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$35,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$35,000
DIVINE WILL FOUNDATION$35,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$35,000
UPMC PINNACLE FOUNDATION$35,000
VOOM FOUNDATION$35,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$35,000
James Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association Inc$35,000
WILLIAM NOVICK GLOBAL CARDIAC ALLIANCE$35,000
Hearts for Mission International$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 75% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VOOM FOUNDATION: $70k → 15%UPMC PINNACLE FOUNDATION: $35k → 12%DIVINE WILL FOUNDATION: $35k → 11%Hearts for Mission International: $15k → 14%UCLA: $25k → 14%REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN FUND INC: $70k → 17%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $35k → 10%MCGOVERN MEDICAL SCHOOL DEP OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY: $25k → 16%VOOM FOUNDATION: $93k → 22%PERUVIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY: $70k → 14%ST JOHN HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 15%CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $38k → 14%BAPTIST HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $29k → 14%PERUVIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY: $20k → 8%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $25k → 14%JOYCE FAMILY FOUNDATION: $38k → 6%WILLIAM NOVICK GLOBAL CARDIAC ALLIANCE: $35k → 17%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $70k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $35k → 8%TEAM HEART: $38k → 7%INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $35k → 16%INDIANA UNIVERSITY: $35k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $35k → 9%TEAM HEART: $38k → 10%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $38k → 19%VOOM FOUNDATION: $70k → 15%UPMC PINNACLE FOUNDATION: $35k → 12%DIVINE WILL FOUNDATION: $35k → 11%REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN FUND INC: $35k → 17%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $70k → 10%VOOM FOUNDATION: $35k → 22%PERUVIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY: $37k → 14%CHILDREN'S NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $38k → 14%JOYCE FAMILIY FOUNDATION: $35k → 6%WILLIAM NOVICK GLOBAL CARDIAC ALLIANCE: $35k → 17%TEAM HEART: $38k → 7%James Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association Inc: $35k → 16%VOOM FOUNDATION: $64k → 15%UPMC PINNACLE FOUNDATION: $29k → 12%SALVANDO CORAZONES-PERUVIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY: $35k → 14%CHILDREN'S NATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $35k → 14%JOYCE FAMILY FOUNDATION: $35k → 6%VOOM FOUNDATION: $38k → 15%JOYCE FAMILY FOUNDATION: $35k → 6%VOOM FOUNDATION: $35k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
IN
PA
CA
UT
CO
MD
NM
TN
NC
DC
OK
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $200k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions, all to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

South America$118k · 59% · 74 people

Stated purpose: Surgical Outreach, Conference Attendance, Lodging & Travel

North America (Canada and Mexico)$42k · 21% · 24 people

Stated purpose: Research & educational Grants, Conference Attendance, Lodging & Travel

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$20k · 10% · 1 person

Stated purpose: Surgical Outreach

South Asia$14k · 7% · 5 people

Stated purpose: Surgical Outreach

East Asia and the Pacific$3k · 1% · 3 people

Stated purpose: Conference Attendance, Lodging & Travel

Sub-Saharan Africa$3k · 1% · 1 person

Stated purpose: Surgical Outreach

Central America and the Caribbean$1k · 1% · 1 person

Stated purpose: Conference Attendance, Lodging & Travel

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 15 repeat orgs$431k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +79% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
10

Total granted

$2.0M
$309k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+33%

Still filing today

67%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $122k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TV
    THE VOOM FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $405k · revenue ×37 · 41% of their budget
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2024 · $205k · revenue +49%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $148k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $38k · revenue +3%
  • CN
    CHILDREN'S NATIONAL
    one grant, 2017 · $38k · revenue +21%
  • WN
    WILLIAM NOVICK GLOBAL CARDIAC ALLIANCEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue +32%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
3
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
6
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
7
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Adventist Healthcare Inc

We extend god's care through the ministry of physical, mental and spiritual healing.

—
10
Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
12
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Joyce Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySouth Asian Cultural and Sp…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Christian Missionary Organi…Community Health CentersPublic University Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%36%35–55yr16%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%34%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,533

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
19/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE VOOM FOUNDATION — $404,800 · HealthTHE VOOM FOUNDATIONTeam Heart Inc — $112,500 · HealthTeam Heart IncUPMC PINNACLE FOUNDATION — $99,000 · HealthUPMC PINNACLE FOUNDATIONCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $37,500 · HealthCHILDREN'S NATIONAL — $37,500 · HealthCHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $35,000 · HealthIndiana University Health Foundation Inc — $35,000 · HealthBaptist Health System Inc — $29,000 · Health+2 more — $50,000 · Health+2 moreUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $140,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA — $140,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS — $105,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXASUNIVERSITY OF UTAH — $104,150 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHIndiana University School of Medicine — $70,000 · OtherIndiana University School of Me…PERUVIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY — $37,200 · OtherRILEY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $35,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER HOUSTON — $25,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $25,000 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA — $25,000 · OtherDUKE UNIVERSITY — $205,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $147,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORA…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $72,500 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVER…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $25,000 · EducationBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY — $20,000 · EducationPERUVIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY — $125,000 · InternationalPERUVIAN AMERICAN…UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN FUND INC — $105,000 · InternationalUNIVERSITY OF CAP…DIVINE WILL FOUNDATION — $70,000 · InternationalDIVINE WILL FOUND…WILLIAM NOVICK GLOBAL CARDIAC ALLIANCE — $35,000 · InternationalWILLIAM NOVICK GL…AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDA…Hearts for Mission International — $15,000 · InternationalJOYCE FAMILY FOUNDATION — $142,500 · Philanthropy
Health$840,300Other$706,350Education$470,000International$385,000Philanthropy$142,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE VOOM FOUNDATION — $404,800 over 7y, 41% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $205,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $147,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJOYCE FAMILY FOUNDATION — $142,500 over 4y, 18% of budgetPERUVIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY — $125,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetTeam Heart Inc — $112,500 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN FUND INC — $105,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetUPMC PINNACLE FOUNDATION — $99,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $72,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDIVINE WILL FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $37,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S NATIONAL — $37,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM NOVICK GLOBAL CARDIAC ALLIANCE — $35,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIndiana University Health Foundation Inc — $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaptist Health System Inc — $29,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHearts for Mission International — $15,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Thoracic Surgery Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Baptist Health System Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines