Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Thomas Lord Charitable Ta

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$190k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Science & Tech$985kEducation$875kHealth$300kReligion$126kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kArts & Culture$60kCivil Rights$55kHuman Services$25k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VATICAN OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION$100,000
CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION$25,000
ALLEGHENY COLLEGE$25,000
EMMAUS MINISTRIES$10,000
MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FND$10,000
MOTHER TERESA ACADEMY$10,000
EXTRA MILE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VATICAN OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $510k → 15%DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH: $100k → 11%GETTYSBURG FOUNDATION: $25k → 15%CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $100k → 14%MOTHER TERESA ACADEMY: $10k → 7%ALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $50k → 10%CREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE FOUNDATION INC: $50k → 13%CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $100k → 11%MARINE CORPS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $90k → 9%CATHOLIC COALITION FOR SPECIAL: $25k → 8%VATICAN OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $100k → 15%EXTRA MILE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%GETTYSBURG FOUNDATION: $25k → 15%ALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $25k → 10%CREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 13%CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%MARINE CORPS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $50k → 9%CATHOLIC COALITION FOR SPECIAL: $25k → 8%VATICAN OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $100k → 15%EXTRA MILE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%EMMAUS MINISTRIES: $10k → 15%ALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $25k → 10%MARINE CORPS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $50k → 9%VATICAN OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $75k → 15%EXTRA MILE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%EMMAUS MINISTRIES: $10k → 15%ALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $25k → 10%MARINE CORPS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%VATICAN OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $25k → 15%EXTRA MILE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%EMMAUS MINISTRIES: $10k → 15%ALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $25k → 10%MARINE CORPS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%VATICAN OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $25k → 15%EXTRA MILE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%ALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $25k → 10%MARINE CORPS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%VATICAN OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $25k → 15%EXTRA MILE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%ALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $25k → 10%MARINE CORPS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $25k → 9%VATICAN OBSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $25k → 15%GANNON UNIVERSITY: $25k → 15%HAMOT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $55k → 15%HAMOT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $20k → 15%MERCY CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $25k → 15%VILLA MARIA CATHERDRAL PREPARATORY: $30k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
AZ
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 12 repeat orgs$375k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$2.2M
$355k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+20%

Still filing today

67%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VO
    Vatican Observatory Foundation
    8× · 2017–2025 · $885k · revenue +134%
  • MC
    MARINE CORPS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $300k · revenue +114%
  • AC
    ALLEGHENY COLLEGE
    7× · 2017–2025 · $200k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • CI
    CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +0%
  • DO
    DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mount Marty University

Mount marty university, an academic community in the catholic benedictine liberal arts tradition, prepares students for a contemporary world of work, service to the human community, and personal growth. the institution is a private,…

Education
2
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
3
Mercyhurst University

Rooted in our Mercy Catholic liberal arts identity, we educate and inspire diverse learners in an environment where faith and reason flourish together for meaningful lives, dignified work, and leadership in service toward a just and loving…

Education
4
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
5
University of Pittsburgh

The university of pittsburgh, founded in 1787, is one of the oldest institutions of higher education in the united states and one of the nation's top public research universities. for more than two centuries, the university of pittsburgh…

Education
6
Marymount University

Marymount is a nationally ranked comprehensive catholic university, guided by the traditions of the religious of the sacred heart of mary, that emphasizes intellectual curiosity, service to others, and a global perspective. a marymount…

—
7
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
8
Cabrini Legacy Corporation

See schedule o.education of the heart: cabrini university was a catholic institution of higher education. the cabrini legacy corporation exists to protect the legacy of the former university.cabrini university was a catholic institution of…

Education
9
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
10
St Francis College

St. francis college is an independent, coeducational institution of higher education chartered by an act of the regents of the university of the state of new york on april 10, 1957.

Education
11
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
12
Daemen University

Private, independent university providing higher education to students. The mission of Daemen University is to prepare creative, ethically-minded leaders for a diverse and interconnected world by integrating the intellectual strengths…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gettysburg Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Vatican Observatory Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Vatican Observatory Foundation: $885,000 · OtherVatican Observatory FoundationCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $150,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONDIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH: $100,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF PITTSBURGHTRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITYEMMAUS MINISTRIES: $75,000 · OtherCREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · OtherCATHOLIC COALITION FOR SPECIAL: $55,000 · Other+4 more: $115,650 · Other+4 moreMARINE CORPS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 · EducationMARINE CORPS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION IN…ALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $200,000 · EducationALLEGHENY COLLEGEEXTRA MILE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $190,000 · EducationEXTRA MILE EDUCATION FOUNDATIONCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $100,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYGANNON UNIVERSITY: $35,000 · Education+1 more: $10,000 · EducationHAMOT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $75,000 · HealthGETTYSBURG FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,555,650Education$835,000Health$75,000Arts & Culture$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVatican Observatory Foundation: $885,000 over 8y, 8.7% of budgetMARINE CORPS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $200,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEXTRA MILE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $190,000 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetHAMOT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetGETTYSBURG FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGANNON UNIVERSITY: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMOTHER TERESA ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Vatican Observatory Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MARINE CORPS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLEGHENY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds EXTRA MILE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds CREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HAMOT HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GETTYSBURG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GANNON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MERCY CENTER FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds MOTHER TERESA ACADEMY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ge Aerospace FoundationCT11.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Thomas Lord Charitable Ta funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Thomas Lord Charitable Ta. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Thomas Lord Charitable Ta’s filings →

    More from the funding graph