Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Thomas J Edelman Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$785k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$3.3MPhilanthropy$2.4MAnimals$1.1MHuman Services$210kArts & Culture$101kHealth$71kInternational$60kReligion$37kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $116k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
  • $250k+1 grant · $785k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL$785,482
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY$150,000
NEW YORK SCHOOL OF INTERIOR DESIGN$50,000
LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE$35,000
COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL$25,000
SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE$25,000
Individual grant recipient$21,250
ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS (ARF HAMPTONS)$10,000
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$7,667
PESTALOZZI US CHILDREN'S CHARITY INC$5,000
THE ASPEN INSTITUTE$5,000
THE MOUNT VERNON LADIES ASSOCIATION$5,000
FRIENDS OF UPPER EAST SIDE HISTORIC DISTRICTS INC$3,000
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY$2,000
EAST HAMPTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $223k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHILDREN IN CONFLICT: $10k → 17%ELEANOR WHITMORE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER INC: $1k → 7%ELEANOR WHITMORE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER INC: $1k → 7%ELEANOR WHITMORE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER INC: $1k → 7%LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $35k → 17%LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $35k → 17%LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $35k → 17%LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $35k → 17%LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $25k → 17%LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $25k → 17%LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $10k → 17%LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
VA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.0M · 37 repeat orgs$177k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
22

Total granted

$5.0M
$172k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+21%

Still filing today

73%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureAnimalsHuman ServicesPhilanthropySocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +88%
  • WC
    Wildlife Conservation Society
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +59%
  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2018–2022 · $300k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • TF
    The Frick Collection
    one grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue -22%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue -59%
  • HF
    HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
2
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
3
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
4
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
5
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
10
The Trustees of the New York Society Library

The new york society library was founded in 1754 by the new york society, a civic-minded group formed in the belief that the availability of books would help the city of new york to prosper.

—
11
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Aspen Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/47
Grantees still filing
35/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL: $1,885,873 · EducationTHE HOTCHKISS SCHOOLGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $300,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE: $275,000 · EducationSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGENEW YORK SCHOOL OF INTERIOR DESIGN: $255,000 · EducationNEW YORK SCHOOL OF INTERIOR DESIGNTEACHING MATTERS INC: $157,500 · EducationThe Trustees of Princeton University: $151,667 · Education+2 more: $27,000 · EducationVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $1,628,467 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOW…+3 more: $40,250 · PhilanthropyWildlife Conservation Society: $1,106,000 · AnimalsWildlife Conserv…+2 more: $3,400 · AnimalsFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $736,817 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY IN…+1 more: $5,183 · Community ImprovementCOLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL: $275,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA L…Individual grant recipient: $127,120 · OtherIndividual…The Frick Collection: $75,000 · OtherThe Frick …CONGREGATION EMANUEL: $36,850 · OtherHOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY: $25,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $30,000 · Other+34 more: $136,948 · Other+34 moreLENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $210,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN IN CONFLICT INC: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $35,000 · Social ScienceGLOBAL POVERTY PROJECT INC: $7,500 · Social Science
Education$3,052,040Philanthropy$1,668,717Animals$1,109,400Community Improvement$742,000Other$705,918Human Services$223,000Social Science$42,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL: $1,885,873 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $1,628,467 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $1,106,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $736,817 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $300,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE: $275,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetNEW YORK SCHOOL OF INTERIOR DESIGN: $255,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetLENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $210,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTEACHING MATTERS INC: $157,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $151,667 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe Frick Collection: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPESTALOZZI US CHILDRENS CHARITY INC: $39,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPRINCETON PROSPECT FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTHE COMMON GOOD FORUM INC: $12,800 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDREN IN CONFLICT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE BOYS' CLUB OF NEW YORK: $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $8,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL POVERTY PROJECT INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LADIES VILLAGE IMPROVEMENT SOCIETY OF EAST HAMPTON: $5,183 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetEAST HAMPTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSPRINGS FOOD PANTRY INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GRADUATE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE UPPER EAST SIDE HISTORIC DISTRICTS INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetEAST HAMPTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History: $3,275 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SECOND STAGE THEATRE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELEANOR WHITMORE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK JUNIOR TENNIS LEAGUE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEvelyn Alexander Wildlife Rescue Center Inc: $2,400 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFABRETTO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GARDEN CLUB OF EAST HAMPTONINC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $1,450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVILLAGE PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF EAST HAMPTON INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREADWORKSINC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRIGG - C M RUSSELL FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHBS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE MAIDSTONE CHARITABLE TRUST: $840 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetON COURSE FOUNDATION USA: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPIONEER WORKS ART FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRONXVILLE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK SCHOOL OF INTERIOR DESIGN ↗
  • Who funds LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds TEACHING MATTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds The Frick Collection ↗
  • Who funds PESTALOZZI US CHILDRENS CHARITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PRINCETON PROSPECT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMON GOOD FORUM INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN IN CONFLICT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOYS' CLUB OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL POVERTY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LADIES VILLAGE IMPROVEMENT SOCIETY OF EAST HAMPTON ↗
  • Who funds EAST HAMPTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGS FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GRADUATE CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE UPPER EAST SIDE HISTORIC DISTRICTS INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST HAMPTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Museum of Natural History ↗
  • Who funds Maidstone Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SECOND STAGE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds ELEANOR WHITMORE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY22.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Stephanie & Lawrence Flinn Jrcharitable Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The New York Community Trust · The Jct Foundation · J & Ar Foundation · The Hilaria and Alec Baldwin Foundation Inc · The Philippe & Deborah Dauman Foundation · The Maryam and Hervey Seley Foundation · The Mat Charitable Foundation Inc · Mary Jane Hipp Brock Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Thomas J Edelman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Thomas J Edelman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Thomas J Edelman’s filings →

More from the funding graph