Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Terry and Julie Smith Zephyrus Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$184k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KULIKAYO$15,500
FREE RAIN INTERNATIONAL INC$12,500
STAND UP PLACER INC$4,500
SIERRA PREGNANCY & HEALTH$3,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PLACER COUNTY$1,500
CENTER FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN IN CRIS$1,500
HOLDING OUT HELP$1,500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 61% of grant dollars ($25k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 39% that went abroad ($16k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FREE RAIN INTERNATIONAL INC: $13k → 11%HOLDING OUT HELP: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 39% of all-years giving ($16k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Canada$16k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Womens Center

Affirming the life of the preborn child, we provide medical and educational services to women in unplanned pregnancies, and those who significantly influence them, by encouraging Christ-centered, life affirming and healthy lifestyle…

Human Services
2
Safe Embrace

Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…

Health
3
A Women's Pregnancy Center

To provide abortion alternatives, to educate clients, and provide alternative counsel.

Human Services
4
Pregnancy Choices of Skagit County

Pregnancy Choices is a Christian ministry caring for those touched by unplanned pregnancy by providing options and resources that promote life.

Health
5
Life Choice Pregnancy Center of Western North Carolina

Choosing Life over Abortion

Human Services
6
Pregnancy Life Center

Protect life of the unborn and provide housing and life skills for homeless pregnant women and mothers with new babies that are accepted into our maternaty home program

Human Services
7
Willow Womens Center

The organization offers medical services and resources to women who are or might be pregnant at no cost.

Human Services
8
Aid for Women Inc

Aid for Women operates pregnancy help centers, pregnancy medical clinics and residential programs to assist women in difficult and unexpected pregnancy situations so that they might choose life.

—
9
S a F E Shelter

We are committed to helping victims of sexual assault and abuse and domestic assault and abuse through advocacy support and education. We provide emergency shelter to domestic assault victims. We Also are committed to educating the public…

—
10
Tri-Valley Haven for Women

Tri-Valley Haven for Women provides emergency shelter and services for survivors and their children who are victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, homelessness, and poverty. Tri-Valley offers a variety of supplemental services…

—
11
Domestic Violence Project

The mission of SafeHouse Center is to empower survivors of both sexual and intimate partner violence by providing advocacy, support, and promoting social change within our community.

Human Services
12
Central Valley Gender Health & Wellness
Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Weave Inc; the most unlike its peers is Holding Out Help. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KULIKAYO: $15,500 · OtherKULIKAYOSTAND UP PLACER INC: $4,500 · OtherSTAND UP PLACER INCBoys and Girls Club of Placer County: $1,500 · OtherBoys and Girls Club of Placer CountyFREE RAIN INTERNATIONAL INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesFREE RAIN INTERNATIONAL INCHolding Out HELP: $1,500 · Human ServicesHolding Out HELPSIERRA PREGNANCY & HEALTH: $3,000 · HealthSIERRA PREGN…The Center for Women and Children in Crisis: $1,500 · HealthThe Center f…
Other$21,500Human Services$14,000Health$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFREE RAIN INTERNATIONAL INC: $12,500 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetSTAND UP PLACER INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSIERRA PREGNANCY & HEALTH: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Placer County: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHolding Out HELP: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Center for Women and Children in Crisis: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE8.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Terry and Julie Smith Zephyrus Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Terry and Julie Smith Zephyrus Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Terry and Julie Smith Zephyrus Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Terry and Julie Smith Zephyrus Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Terry and Julie Smith Zephyrus’ filings →

    More from the funding graph