Skip to content
The Technical Assistance Collaborative Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Technical Assistance Collaborative Inc

A nonprofit organization dedicated to helping our nation's human services, health care, homelessness, and affordable housing systems implement policies and practices that empower people to live healthy, independent lives in the communities they choose.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$434k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.5MHuman Services$760kCrime & Legal$353kHousing & Shelter$46kYouth Development$40k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $1,691,284, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,120,324 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $429,040 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $147k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+1 grant · $434k
$99,750
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUSTICE RESOURCE INSTITUTE$433,650
CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF ROXBURY$240,450
NORTHEAST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CORPORATION$130,200
BEHAVIORAL HEALTH NETWORK$128,800
RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CARE$124,950
FAMILY SERVICES ASSOCIATION$114,450
GANDARA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER$109,880
THE BRIEN CENTER$99,750
THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS$81,656
ELIOT COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES$80,850
COMMUNITY HEALTHLINK$39,900
NORTH SUFFOLK COMMUNITY SERVICES$27,300
CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF NEW BEDFORD$26,600
BAY STATE COMMUNITY SERVICES$23,100
YOUTH OPPORTUNITIES UPHELD$15,398
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $777k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BAMSI: $36k → 8%WAYSIDE YOUTH & FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK: $123k → 8%CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF ROXBURY: $240k → 16%CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF ROXBURY: $216k → 16%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $82k → 16%THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS: $80k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 17 repeat orgs$219k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
6

Total granted

$3.5M
$219k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+13%

Still filing today

88%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JUSTICE RESOURCE INSTITUTE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $787k · revenue +5%
  • CS
    CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF ROXBURY INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $457k · revenue +1%
  • BH
    BEHAVIORAL HEALTH NETWORK INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $299k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • WY
    WAYSIDE YOUTH AND FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK INC
    one grant, 2024 · $123k · revenue +6%
  • BA
    BROCKTON AREA MULTI-SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2024 · $36k · revenue +14%
  • CS
    CLINICAL & SUPPORT OPTIONS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $27k · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Maine Behavioral Health Organization

The mission of maine behavioral health organization is to provide evidence based services leading to increased quality of life; through research, advocacy, education, operated services, and participation in public mental health policy…

Health
2
Cornerstone Montgomery

Empowering people living with mental health and substance use disorders to thrive in their community through collaboration, treatment, education and advocacy.

—
3
Continuum of Care Inc

To provide comprehensive community based residential and support services that enable persons with psychiatric and developmental disabilities to live as fully in the community as possible.

—
4
Northeast Arc Inc

Helping adults and children with disabilities, (incl asd), become full participants in the community.

—
5
Threshold Rehabilitation Services Inc

The mission of threshold, inc. is to enhance the quality of life of persons with disabilities and the economically disadvantaged by providing opportunities to achieve total integration into their community through vocational…

Employment
6
Bay Cove Human Services Inc

Bay cove human services' mission is to partner with people to overcome challenges and realize personal potential. bay cove pursues this mission by providing individualized and compassionate services to people facing the challenges…

—
7
Canvas Health Inc

To be a recognized leader in community mental health, respected for our clinical quality, innovation, and adaptation to a rapidly changing health care and social services environment.

Human Services
8
Jamhi Health & Wellness Inc

We provide a comprehensive, co occurring disorder-capable, community behavioral health center. we provide quality care using best practices designed to promote health, wellness, self-determination, and recovery. the service area is the…

Health
9
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc was established to provide comprehensive services to individuals/families with special needs to enable them to reach their highest level of independence and integration into the community.

Human Services
10
Community Care

To provide quality community-based services that are timely and effective in promoting the health and well being of individuals and their families.

Human Services
11
Klamath Child & Family Treatment Center Inc

Our values and mission vision: sharing the power of mental wellbeing mission: providing compassionate care throughout our community core values: dignity - we treat everyone as individuals and with respect. stewardship - we are trusted…

Health
12
Concern - Professional Services for Children Youth and Families

Concern's mission: concern brings hope, offers opportunity, and inspires change. concern's vision: to encourage growth and promote positive healthy lives.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Service Association of Greater Fall River Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Low Income Housing Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
20/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BEHAVIORAL HEALTH NETWORK INC: $298,801 · HealthBEHAVIORAL HEALTH NETWORK INCNORTHEAST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CORPORATION: $247,312 · HealthNORTHEAST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CORPORA…RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CARE INC: $237,340 · HealthRIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CARE INCTHE BRIEN CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES: $189,473 · HealthTHE BRIEN CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH …ELIOT COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES INC: $153,573 · HealthELIOT COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES INCCOMMUNITY COUNSELING OF BRISTOL COUNTY INC: $49,428 · HealthFAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF GREATER FALL RIVER INC: $207,706 · OtherFAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION O…GANDARA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $207,414 · OtherGANDARA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER…UMASS MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE INC: $137,435 · OtherUMASS MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE I…CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $98,378 · OtherCHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES IN…NORTH SUFFOLK COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $94,034 · OtherNORTH SUFFOLK COMMUNITY SERV…Bay State Community Services Inc: $79,568 · OtherBay State Community Services…YOUTH OPPORTUNITIES UPHELD INC: $55,065 · OtherYOUTH OPPORTUNITIES UPHELD I…+3 more: $49,378 · OtherJUSTICE RESOURCE INSTITUTE INC: $786,996 · Crime & LegalJUSTICE RESOURCE INSTITU…CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF ROXBURY INC: $456,728 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S SERVICES OF …THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $161,935 · Human ServicesTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WAN…WAYSIDE YOUTH AND FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK INC: $122,779 · Human ServicesWAYSIDE YOUTH AND FAMIL…BROCKTON AREA MULTI-SERVICES INC: $35,889 · Human ServicesNATIONAL LOW INCOME HOUSING COALITION: $29,500 · Housing & ShelterCITIZENS' HOUSING AND PLANNING ASSOCIATION INC: $11,000 · Housing & Shelter
Health$1,175,927Other$928,978Crime & Legal$786,996Human Services$777,331Housing & Shelter$40,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJUSTICE RESOURCE INSTITUTE INC: $786,996 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S SERVICES OF ROXBURY INC: $456,728 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBEHAVIORAL HEALTH NETWORK INC: $298,801 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEAST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CORPORATION: $247,312 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CARE INC: $237,340 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF GREATER FALL RIVER INC: $207,706 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGANDARA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $207,414 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BRIEN CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES: $189,473 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $161,935 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetELIOT COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES INC: $153,573 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWAYSIDE YOUTH AND FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK INC: $122,779 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $98,378 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH SUFFOLK COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $94,034 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBay State Community Services Inc: $79,568 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY COUNSELING OF BRISTOL COUNTY INC: $49,428 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBROCKTON AREA MULTI-SERVICES INC: $35,889 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL LOW INCOME HOUSING COALITION: $29,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCLINICAL & SUPPORT OPTIONS INC: $27,378 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEARNING CENTER FOR THE DEAF INC: $17,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITIZENS' HOUSING AND PLANNING ASSOCIATION INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Medical Center…Health Resources in A…United Way Of Massach…Boston Foundation IncMassachusetts League …Eastern Bank Foundati…Rize Massachusetts Fo…The Food Bank of West…Mass General Brigham …Cambridge Savings Cha…The Beveridge Family …Enterprise Holdings F…
Boston Medical Center CorporationMA26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Medical Center Corporation · Health Resources in Action Inc · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Rize Massachusetts Foundation Inc · The Food Bank of Western Massachusetts Inc · Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return · Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · The Beveridge Family Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Technical Assistance Collaborative Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Technical Assistance Collaborative Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 32%
  • Bay State Community Services Inc: 76% of income from government
  • North Suffolk Community Services Inc: 63% of income from government
  • Riverside Community Care Inc: 58% of income from government
  • Gandara Mental Health Center Inc: 55% of income from government
  • Justice Resource Institute Inc: 48% of income from government
  • The Home for Little Wanderers Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Children's Services of Roxbury Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Clinical & Support Options Inc: 32% of income from government
  • Behavioral Health Network Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Citizens' Housing and Planning Association Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Northeast Behavioral Health Corporation: 24% of income from government
  • Child and Family Services Inc: 24% of income from government
  • The Learning Center for the Deaf Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Community Counseling of Bristol County Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Wayside Youth and Family Support Network Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Brockton Area Multi-Services Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Technical Assistance Collaborative’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home