Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Food Bank of Western Massachusetts Inc

The food bank of western massachusetts' mission is to feed our neighbors in need and lead the community to end hunger.

$26M
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What you fund
0184% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20222025.

Food & Nutrition$1.3MHuman Services$190kHousing & Shelter$35kHealth$25kPublic Benefit$7kEducation$4kReligion$1kOther$301k
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 34 grants below total $122,638 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $26,299,224 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $26,176,586 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$58M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRANKLIN COUNTY COMMUNITY MEALS PROGRAM$8,942
MCKNIGHT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP$8,149
FREEDOM HOUSE OF GOD$7,500
DEEPER LIFE BIBLE CHURCH OF SPRINGFIELD$7,500
CLINICAL & SUPPORT OPTIONS INC$7,500
SPRING OF HOPE CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST$7,500
MARTIN LUTHER KING JR FAMILY SERVICES$7,500
CASA DE ORACION EMMANUEL$7,500
MACEDONIA CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST$6,883
MANNA SOUP KITCHEN INC$5,300
SPRINGFIELD TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE$5,000
STRAITWAY TO HEAVEN COGIC$4,961
NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER$4,798
PROJECT NEW HOPE INC$3,700
ALL NATION CHURCH OF GOD$3,354
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $190k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CHRISTIAN CENTER OF PITTSFIELD: $15k → 12%EASTHAMPTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $19k → 12%BERKSHIRE DREAM CENTER INC: $8k → 12%EASTHAMPTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 12%CHRISTIAN CENTER OF PITTSFIELD: $5k → 12%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY- WESTFIELD: $4k → 17%UNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY: $16k → 17%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $41k → 12%CHRISTIAN CENTER OF PITTSFIELD: $3k → 12%BRICK HOUSE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 14%UNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY: $15k → 17%NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER: $5k → 12%AMHERST SURVIVAL CENTER: $13k → 12%COMMUNITY SURVIVAL CENTER: $1k → 17%COMMUNITY SURVIVAL CENTER: $518 → 17%OPEN PANTRY COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $8k → 17%MARTIN LUTHER KING JR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $15k → 17%MARTIN LUTHER KING JR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $10k → 17%MARTIN LUTHER KING JR FAMILY SERVICES: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$481k · 30 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.

30 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
23

Total granted

$481k
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+25%

Still filing today

70%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterHealthPublic BenefitEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $46k · revenue +44%
  • FC
    FRANKLIN COUNTY COMMUNITY MEALS PROGRAM INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +113%
  • CS
    CLINICAL & SUPPORT OPTIONS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +137%

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FOOD BANK SUPPORT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2022 · $1.2M · revenue -83% · 99% of their budget
  • SC
    SURVIVAL CENTERS INCgraduated
    9× · 2017–2025 · $13k · revenue +215%
  • CP
    CHRISTIAN PENTECOSTAL CHURCH OF HOLYOKE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Merrimack Valley Food Bank Inc

The focus of the merrimack valley food bank is to help meet a person's most profound need - adequate nutrition and freedom from hunger. only through cooperative efforts can society initiate change, develop strategies to alleviate hunger,…

Food & Nutrition
2
Community Cooks Inc

Community cooks mobilizes individuals, businesses, civic educational and faith-based groups to prepare home-cooked food for vulnerable populations seeking assistance from human service agencies throughout greater boston. the agency…

Food & Nutrition
3
Middlebury Transitional Care Coalition

Provide emergency shelter for individuals who have become homeless, and a community meal program 7 days per week and social services case management and referrals as requested.

Housing & Shelter
4
Billerica Community Pantry Inc

Provide assistance to those within the Billerica Community with food and personal care items to alleviate hunger and poverty.

Food & Nutrition
5
Central Ma Food Rescue Inc

Full belly foods purchases food from farms and wholesalers and donates the food to low-income communities across the country.

Food & Nutrition
6
East Boston Community Soup Kitchen Inc

To feed, shelter and assist with recovery and self-care the hungry and homeless in our community, and to do so without judgement or exclusivity

Human Services
7
The Open Pantry of Greater Lowell Inc

The mission of The Open Pantry is to relieve hunger in our community. We aim to connect people to a variety of filling, nutritious, and culturally-appropriate food as well as to other community resources; to advocate on behalf of those in…

8
Newton Food Pantry Inc

The newton food pantry works to alleviate food insecurity by providing free supplemental food and personal care products to community members in need, serving clients with dignity, compassion and respect.

Food & Nutrition
9
Food Link Inc

Food link is working to create a more equitable food system throughout greater boston by rescuing and distributing high-quality, customized food to under-resourced communities and by advocating for systems change.

Food & Nutrition
10
Dwelling House of Hope Inc

Alleviate poverty among New-Americans and low-income families in the Merrimack Valley through food assistance, educational, social and cultural initiatives which foster diversity, inclusivity and equity

Food & Nutrition
11
Emergency Food Aid in Southbury

Providing food assistance to Southbury residents demonstrating need.

12
Tewksbury Community Pantry Inc

The heart of the tewksbury community pantry's mission lies in our commitment to assist residents of tewksbury facing hardships. we extend beyond mere food distribution, offering guidance towards additional resources, ensuring our clients…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Survival Centers Inc and the most unlike its peers is Uso Council of Pioneer Valley Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPublic Safety Professional …Youth and Family ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Community Health SystemsVulnerable Population Suppo…Independent Schools and Ear…Youth Arts and Cultural Edu…Vulnerable Population Suppo…Food Assistance & Emergency…Public Libraries & Literary…Community Media Access Orga…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%8%<5yr12%6%5–10yr17%16%10–20yr17%13%20–35yr16%29%35–55yr17%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%2%<5yr12%71%5–10yr17%3%10–20yr17%2%20–35yr16%11%35–55yr17%11%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%4/140
the rest of the field
10%
421/4,171

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

83 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
77/83
Grantees still filing
57/83
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE FOOD BANK SUPPORT CORPORATION — $1,232,740 · Food & NutritionTHE FOOD BANK SUPPORT CORPORATION+9 more — $63,440 · Food & NutritionFRANKLIN COUNTY COMMUNITY MEALS PROGRAM INC — $43,042 · OtherFRANKLIN COUNTY CO…CLINICAL & SUPPORT OPTIONS INC — $32,720 · OtherCLINICAL & SUPPORT…COMMUNITY ACTION PIONEER VALLEY — $25,349 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION P…The Gray House Inc — $24,085 · OtherThe Gray House IncSALVATION ARMY & ITS COMPONENTS — $20,757 · OtherSALVATION ARMY & I…THE UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST — $16,002 · OtherCHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST INC — $15,861 · Other+27 more — $123,034 · Other+27 moreNORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER INC — $46,045 · Human ServicesNORTHAMPTON…MARTIN LUTHER KING JR FAMILY SERVICES INC — $32,500 · Human ServicesMARTIN LUTH…UNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY INC — $31,548 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY …THE CHRISTIAN CENTER OF PITTSFIELD — $22,500 · Human ServicesTHE CHRISTI…THE FRIENDS OF EAST LONGMEADOW COUNCIL ON AGING INC — $21,006 · Human ServicesTHE FRIENDS…SURVIVAL CENTERS INC — $13,138 · Human ServicesSURVIVAL CE…BERKSHIRE DREAM CENTER INC — $8,336 · Human ServicesSOUTH MIDDLESEX OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC — $8,331 · Human Services+3 more — $6,448 · Human ServicesProvidence Ministries for the Needy Inc — $13,631 · Housing & ShelterGreater Westfield Mass Committee for the Homeless Inc — $10,281 · Housing & ShelterTHE COMMUNITY BUILDERS INC — $9,726 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $959 · Housing & ShelterONE CALL AWAY INC — $23,223 · HealthBAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER INC — $899 · Health+1 more — $650 · HealthPROJECT NEW HOPE INC — $6,562 · Public BenefitSPRINGFIELD COLLEGE — $4,457 · EducationParish Cupboard Inc — $1,000 · Religion
Food & Nutrition$1,296,180Other$300,850Human Services$189,852Housing & Shelter$34,597Health$24,772Public Benefit$6,562Education$4,457Religion$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE FOOD BANK SUPPORT CORPORATION — $1,232,740 over 1y, 99% of budgetNORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER INC — $46,045 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetFRANKLIN COUNTY COMMUNITY MEALS PROGRAM INC — $43,042 over 9y, 8.5% of budgetCLINICAL & SUPPORT OPTIONS INC — $32,720 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMARTIN LUTHER KING JR FAMILY SERVICES INC — $32,500 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY INC — $31,548 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PIONEER VALLEY — $25,349 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Gray House Inc — $24,085 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetONE CALL AWAY INC — $23,223 over 5y, 26% of budgetTHE CHRISTIAN CENTER OF PITTSFIELD — $22,500 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF EAST LONGMEADOW COUNCIL ON AGING INC — $21,006 over 9y, 69% of budgetBERKSHIRE FOOD PROJECT INC — $14,432 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetProvidence Ministries for the Needy Inc — $13,631 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSURVIVAL CENTERS INC — $13,138 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetOUR COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC — $11,540 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetGreater Westfield Mass Committee for the Homeless Inc — $10,281 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY BUILDERS INC — $9,726 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA SOUP KITCHEN — $8,802 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH PROGRAMS INCORPORATED — $8,697 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBERKSHIRE DREAM CENTER INC — $8,336 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetSOUTH MIDDLESEX OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC — $8,331 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWALES COMMUNITY PANTRY — $7,781 over 9y, 20% of budgetPROJECT NEW HOPE INC — $6,562 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetStone Soup Cafe Inc — $6,507 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTHE PEOPLES PANTRY — $5,367 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetSPRINGFIELD COLLEGE — $4,457 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWendell Good Neighbors Inc — $4,098 over 9y, 37% of budgetGREATER WESTFIELD EMERGENCY — $4,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE US SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL INC — $3,914 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPITTSFIELD COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC — $3,718 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY SURVIVAL CENTER — $1,534 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BRICK HOUSE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetParish Cupboard Inc — $1,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetINDEPENDENT HOUSING I INC — $959 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER INC — $899 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTAPESTRY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC — $650 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FOOD BANK SUPPORT CORPORATION
  • Who funds NORTHAMPTON SURVIVAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds FRANKLIN COUNTY COMMUNITY MEALS PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds CLINICAL & SUPPORT OPTIONS INC
  • Who funds MARTIN LUTHER KING JR FAMILY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF PIONEER VALLEY INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PIONEER VALLEY
  • Who funds The Gray House Inc
  • Who funds ONE CALL AWAY INC
  • Who funds THE CHRISTIAN CENTER OF PITTSFIELD
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF EAST LONGMEADOW COUNCIL ON AGING INC
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE FOOD PROJECT INC
  • Who funds Providence Ministries for the Needy Inc
  • Who funds SURVIVAL CENTERS INC
  • Who funds OUR COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds Greater Westfield Mass Committee for the Homeless Inc
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY BUILDERS INC
  • Who funds MANNA SOUP KITCHEN
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH PROGRAMS INCORPORATED
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE DREAM CENTER INC
  • Who funds SOUTH MIDDLESEX OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds WALES COMMUNITY PANTRY
  • Who funds PROJECT NEW HOPE INC
  • Who funds Stone Soup Cafe Inc
  • Who funds THE PEOPLES PANTRY
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD COLLEGE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Western MassachusettsMA100.4× affinity53 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Western Massachusetts · The Beveridge Family Foundation · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Health New England Inc · United Way of the Franklin & Hampshire Region · Easthampton Savings Bank Foundation Inc · United Way of Pioneer Valley Inc · Berkshire United Way Inc · The Irene E and George A Davis Foundation · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Marguerite Jossel Charitable Foundation · Florence Savings Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Food Bank of Western Massachusetts Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 130%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • Community Action Pioneer Valley62% of income from government
  • Tapestry Health Systems Inc60% of income from government
  • Clinical & Support Options Inc32% of income from government
  • Stone Soup Cafe Inc26% of income from government
  • South Middlesex Opportunity Council Inc18% of income from government
  • Manna Soup Kitchen15% of income from government
  • Neighbors Helping Neighbors Inc14% of income from government
  • Community Health Programs Incorporated13% of income from government
  • United Way of Pioneer Valley Inc10% of income from government
  • Baystate Medical Center Inc9% of income from government
  • Survival Centers Inc9% of income from government
  • Berkshire Dream Center Inc7% of income from government
  • The Community Builders Inc4% of income from government
  • Northampton Survival Center Inc3% of income from government
  • Independent Housing I Inc2% of income from government
  • Parish Cupboard Inc2% of income from government
  • Springfield College1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph