· Public charity
The Technical Assistance Collaborative Inc
A nonprofit organization dedicated to helping our nation's human services, health care, homelessness, and affordable housing systems implement policies and practices that empower people to live healthy, independent lives in the communities they choose.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 16 grants below total $1,691,284 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,120,324 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $429,040 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k6 grants · $147k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $1.1M
- $250k+1 grant · $434k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JUSTICE RESOURCE INSTITUTE | $433,650 |
| CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF ROXBURY | $240,450 |
| NORTHEAST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CORPORATION | $130,200 |
| BEHAVIORAL HEALTH NETWORK | $128,800 |
| RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CARE | $124,950 |
| FAMILY SERVICES ASSOCIATION | $114,450 |
| GANDARA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER | $109,880 |
| THE BRIEN CENTER | $99,750 |
| THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS | $81,656 |
| ELIOT COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES | $80,850 |
| COMMUNITY HEALTHLINK | $39,900 |
| NORTH SUFFOLK COMMUNITY SERVICES | $27,300 |
| CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF NEW BEDFORD | $26,600 |
| BAY STATE COMMUNITY SERVICES | $23,100 |
| YOUTH OPPORTUNITIES UPHELD | $15,398 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $777k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
JUSTICE RESOURCE INSTITUTE INC2× · 2024–2025 · $787k · revenue +5%- CSCHILDREN'S SERVICES OF ROXBURY INC2× · 2024–2025 · $457k · revenue +1%
- BHBEHAVIORAL HEALTH NETWORK INC2× · 2024–2025 · $299k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- WYWAYSIDE YOUTH AND FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK INCone grant, 2024 · $123k · revenue +6%
- BABROCKTON AREA MULTI-SERVICES INCone grant, 2024 · $36k · revenue +14%
- CSCLINICAL & SUPPORT OPTIONS INCone grant, 2024 · $27k · revenue +13%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of maine behavioral health organization is to provide evidence based services leading to increased quality of life; through research, advocacy, education, operated services, and participation in public mental health policy…
Empowering people living with mental health and substance use disorders to thrive in their community through collaboration, treatment, education and advocacy.
To provide comprehensive community based residential and support services that enable persons with psychiatric and developmental disabilities to live as fully in the community as possible.
Helping adults and children with disabilities, (incl asd), become full participants in the community.
The mission of threshold, inc. is to enhance the quality of life of persons with disabilities and the economically disadvantaged by providing opportunities to achieve total integration into their community through vocational…
Bay cove human services' mission is to partner with people to overcome challenges and realize personal potential. bay cove pursues this mission by providing individualized and compassionate services to people facing the challenges…
To be a recognized leader in community mental health, respected for our clinical quality, innovation, and adaptation to a rapidly changing health care and social services environment.
We provide a comprehensive, co occurring disorder-capable, community behavioral health center. we provide quality care using best practices designed to promote health, wellness, self-determination, and recovery. the service area is the…
Alternatives, inc was established to provide comprehensive services to individuals/families with special needs to enable them to reach their highest level of independence and integration into the community.
To provide quality community-based services that are timely and effective in promoting the health and well being of individuals and their families.
Our values and mission vision: sharing the power of mental wellbeing mission: providing compassionate care throughout our community core values: dignity - we treat everyone as individuals and with respect. stewardship - we are trusted…
Concern's mission: concern brings hope, offers opportunity, and inspires change. concern's vision: to encourage growth and promote positive healthy lives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Service Association of Greater Fall River Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Low Income Housing Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 50 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JUSTICE RESOURCE INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF ROXBURY INC ↗
- Who funds BEHAVIORAL HEALTH NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CARE INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF GREATER FALL RIVER INC ↗
- Who funds GANDARA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE BRIEN CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC ↗
- Who funds ELIOT COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds WAYSIDE YOUTH AND FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH SUFFOLK COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Bay State Community Services Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUTH OPPORTUNITIES UPHELD INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COUNSELING OF BRISTOL COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BROCKTON AREA MULTI-SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL LOW INCOME HOUSING COALITION ↗
- Who funds CLINICAL & SUPPORT OPTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds THE LEARNING CENTER FOR THE DEAF INC ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS' HOUSING AND PLANNING ASSOCIATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Medical Center Corporation · Health Resources in Action Inc · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Rize Massachusetts Foundation Inc · The Food Bank of Western Massachusetts Inc · Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return · Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · The Beveridge Family Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Technical Assistance Collaborative Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bay State Community Services Inc — 76% of income from government
- North Suffolk Community Services Inc — 63% of income from government
- Riverside Community Care Inc — 58% of income from government
- Gandara Mental Health Center Inc — 55% of income from government
- Justice Resource Institute Inc — 48% of income from government
- The Home for Little Wanderers Inc — 38% of income from government
- Children's Services of Roxbury Inc — 35% of income from government
- Clinical & Support Options Inc — 32% of income from government
- Behavioral Health Network Inc — 28% of income from government
- Citizens' Housing and Planning Association Inc — 26% of income from government
- Northeast Behavioral Health Corporation — 24% of income from government
- Child and Family Services Inc — 24% of income from government
- The Learning Center for the Deaf Inc — 9% of income from government
- Community Counseling of Bristol County Inc — 3% of income from government
- Wayside Youth and Family Support Network Inc — 1% of income from government
- Brockton Area Multi-Services Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.