Skip to content
The Taub Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Taub Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$271k
Granted FY2025still arriving
52
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.6MReligion$99kInternational$27kHealth$10kPublic Benefit$7kEducation$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kCrime & Legal$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 52 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k45 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $143k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONG KHAL IMREI SHAUL DMODZITZ$50,000
Individual grant recipient$45,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
BOCA BEACH CHABAD JEWISH CENTER$22,791
CONG AHAVAS ACHIM BNAI JACOB & DAVID$17,454
DONATIONS UNDER 1000$12,194
OPERATION ISRAEL INC$10,500
DEMOCRACY NOW$7,000
NEW ISRAEL FUND$6,000
ECHO INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH$5,500
MIGHTY CAUSE FDN CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL$5,000
PRAGER UNIVERSITY$3,750
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DOVID ADOM$2,800
KOLLEL INTERNATIONAL INC$2,500
PROMISE OF JUSTICE INITIATIVE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER USA: $1k → 6%EVERYORG: $1k → 10%PRAGER UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%PANZI FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CENTE: $2k → 9%RABBI JACOB JOSEPH SCHOOL: $1k → 11%KOLLEL TIFERES YISROEL: $45k → 14%DETAILS PROVIDED UPON REQUEST: $283k → 17%ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY: $1k → 20%MUTUAL AID SUDAN: $1k → 14%BOCA BEACH CHABAD JEWISH CENTER: $23k → 11%CHAI LIFELINE SOUTHEAST: $1k → 13%HATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA: $2k → 15%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $1k → 18%TEN BY THREE: $1k → 21%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL: $1k → 7%KOLLEL INTERNATIONAL INC: $3k → 11%PARTNERS IN TORAH: $2k → 12%DETAILS PROVIDED UPON REQUEST: $260k → 16%ISRAEL GIVES: $1k → 9%PROMISE OF JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $2k → 23%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $1k → 10%ECHO INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH: $6k → 14%DETAILS PROVIDED UPON REQUEST: $238k → 17%CONG KHAL IMREI SHAUL DMODZITZ: $50k → 20%CENTER FOR JEWISH NON-VIOLENCE: $1k → 14%OPERATION ISRAEL INC: $11k → 7%CONG AHAVAS ACHIM BNAI JACOB & DAVID: $17k → 16%BELOVED BUILDERS: $1k → 10%DETAILS PROVIDED UPON REQUEST: $201k → 17%CONG ISHEI YISROEL: $35k → 20%DONATIONS UNDER 1000: $12k → 16%DETAILS PROVIDED UPON REQUEST: $197k → 17%ESSEX COUNTY RITUALARIUM: $2k → 16%DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $186k → 17%DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $73k → 17%DETAILS OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $10k → 17%NEW ISRAEL FUND: $6k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DOVID ADOM: $3k → 17%AMIT CHILDREN'S FUND: $1k → 17%MIGDAL OHR USA: $1k → 17%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $1k → 17%TIKVAH FUND: $1k → 17%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $1k → 17%DEMOCRACY NOW: $7k → 17%MESIVTA TIFERETH JERUSALEM: $2k → 17%CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF MIDTOWN MANHATTAN: $2k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS FOR THE WEIZMANN I: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
NJ
CA
MO
VA
DC
LA
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Physicians for Palestine
Health
4
International Fellowship of Christians & Jews Inc

The international fellowship of christian and jews is the leading non-profit building bridges between christians and jews, blessing israel and the jewish people around the world with, humanitarian care and life-saving aid.

—
5
Israel Initiative 2020 Inc
International
6
The Keren Rachaim Fund
—
7
The Jerusalem Connection
—
8
American Friends of Tzir Hemed
Philanthropy
9
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
10
Tzevet Hatzolah Emergency Response

Ensure that every segment of israeli society is protected from terrorism and is well equipped to respond to life threatening emergencies

Public Safety & Disaster
11
The Tzedaka Fund
Philanthropy
12
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Operation Israel Inc; the most unlike its peers is Every Org. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DETAILS PROVIDED UPON REQUEST: $1,179,540 · OtherDETAILS PROVIDED UPON REQUESTDETAILS OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST: $269,461 · OtherDETAILS OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST+34 more: $226,589 · Other+34 moreNEW ISRAEL FUND: $6,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2,800 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER INC: $1,800 · InternationalTen By Three: $1,250 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $1,000 · InternationalHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,000 · InternationalOPERATION ISRAEL INC: $10,500 · PhilanthropyEVERY ORG: $1,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICA GIVES INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyDEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC: $7,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PROMISE OF JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $2,000 · Crime & LegalSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $1,000 · Crime & LegalPARTNERS IN TORAH: $2,000 · ReligionHATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDCIAL SERVICES INC: $1,800 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$1,675,590International$15,850Philanthropy$14,500Arts & Culture$7,000Crime & Legal$3,000Religion$2,000Public Safety & Disaster$1,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PROMISE OF JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTen By Three: $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPERATION ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds THE PROMISE OF JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN TORAH ↗
  • Who funds HATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SOROKA MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Ten By Three ↗
  • Who funds EVERY ORG ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds West Side Hatzoloh ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundGs Donor Advised Phil…The Ojc FundVanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jewish Communal FundNY17.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Ojc Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Taub Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Taub Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Taub Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home