Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sylvia Pevin and George Pevin Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$136k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$450kReligion$176kHuman Services$97kFood & Nutrition$86kHealth$26kRecreation & Sports$22kYouth Development$20kEducation$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION$60,000
TEMPLE BETH EL WESTWOOD CEMETERY$40,000
MSU HILLEL$10,000
TEMPLE BETH EL ARCHIVES$6,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HILLEL$5,000
YAD EZRA$5,000
JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK$2,000
PENRICKTON CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN$1,300
FRESH AIR SOCIETY$1,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $10k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $10k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $10k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $10k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $6k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$410k · 20 repeat orgs$131k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
2

Total granted

$410k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+47%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $121k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YE
    YAD EZRA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $67k · revenue +42%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $61k · revenue +168%
  • FA
    FRESH AIR SOCIETY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $22k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • HF
    HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +47%
  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF METRO DETROIT - UKRAINE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
2
Jewish Historical Society of Michigan

Jewish historical society of michigan shares and celebrates the experiences and contributions of the jewish people, communities and institutions of michigan.

—
3
Hillel of Metropolitan Detroit

Inspire students to be active in jewish life.

Education
4
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
5
Jfa Non-Profit Housing Corporation

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

Housing & Shelter
6
Detroit Jews for Justice

Djj advances racial and economic justice by developing metro detroit jews as community organizers who fight for transformative policy change in deep partnership with neighbors

Civil Rights
7
Jsl Foundation

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

Human Services
8
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
9
Jewish Home and Aging Services

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

—
10
Flint Jewish Federation

To further the welfare of the jewish community

Philanthropy
11
Jewish Apartments and Services Inc

Jewish senior life of metropolitan detroit is dedicated to enhancing the quality of life for older adults of the metropolitan detroit jewish community through the provision of personalized high quality programs and services that support…

Human Services
12
Jewish Family Service

Jewish Family Service is a nonprofit social service organization that supports people of all faiths as they navigate through lifes's challenges - illness, aging , finanical uncertainty, mental health concerns, family problems, or personal…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Detroit; the most unlike its peers is The Midnight Golf Program. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
15/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION: $196,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH FOUNDATIONJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $180,900 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH SENIOR LIFE: $66,900 · OtherJEWISH SENIOR LIFEYAD EZRA: $66,500 · OtherYAD EZRAJEWISH FEDERATION: $60,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONTEMPLE BETH EL WESTWOOD CEMETERY: $40,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETH EL WESTWOOD CEMETERYHILLEL OF METRO DETROIT: $30,400 · OtherHILLEL OF METRO DETROITJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $18,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETH EL: $17,500 · OtherTHE DOROTHY AND PETER BROWN JEWISH COMMUNITY ADULT DAY PROGRAM: $17,500 · Other+11 more: $71,900 · Other+11 moreJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $61,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK: $15,000 · ReligionCONGREGATION B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL: $10,000 · ReligionFRESH AIR SOCIETY: $22,000 · Recreation & SportsFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $19,800 · Food & NutritionTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $9,500 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$381,900Other$388,700Human Services$61,000Religion$25,000Recreation & Sports$22,000Food & Nutrition$19,800Youth Development$19,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION: $196,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $180,900 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetYAD EZRA: $66,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $61,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFRESH AIR SOCIETY: $22,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $19,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK: $15,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $9,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPenrickton Center for Blind Children: $9,200 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDetroit Historical Society: $9,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHistoric Elmwood Foundation: $3,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds YAD EZRA ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds FRESH AIR SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL ↗
  • Who funds THE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds B'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds Penrickton Center for Blind Children ↗
  • Who funds Detroit Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Historic Elmwood Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Eugene Applebaum Family FoundationMI22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · The Irving and Ethel Palman Foundation · Marjorie and Maxwell Jospey Foundation · Ben N Teitel Charitable Trust · Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation Corporation · Cathy and James Deutchman Family Foundation · The Stone Foundation of Michigan · The Bruce H and Rosalie N Rosen Family Foundation · Mickey Shapiro Charitable Trust · Alan Jay and Sue Kaufman Foundation · Malcolm and Beth Lowenstein Foundation · The Ravitz Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sylvia Pevin and George Pevin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sylvia Pevin and George Pevin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Sylvia Pevin and George Pevin Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Sylvia Pevin and George Pevin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sylvia Pevin and George Pevin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph