Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Stone Foundation of Michigan

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$790k
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$1.2MInternational$866kHuman Services$461kArts & Culture$185kFood & Nutrition$161kEducation$113kPhilanthropy$78kCivil Rights$66kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $294k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $160k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE$300,000
HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM$160,000
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$36,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$36,000
CARE HOUSE OF OAKLAND$35,000
CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION$30,000
DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$30,000
UNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION$25,000
STARFISH FAMILY SERVICES$25,000
TEMPLE BETH EL$15,000
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE INC$12,000
GLEANERS FOOD BANK$10,000
GESHER HUMAN SERVICES$10,000
THE HENRY FORD MUSEUM$10,000
BEAUMONT FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $291k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%STARFISH FAMILY SERVICES: $40k → 21%BED FOR KIDS: $1k → 10%STARFISH FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 21%STARFISH FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 21%STARFISH FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 21%STARFISH FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 21%STARFISH FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 21%RED TENT FUND: $5k → 14%OAKLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $15k → 8%OAKLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 8%OAKLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 8%OAKLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 8%OAKLAND FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 8%CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $25k → 8%CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $25k → 8%CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $10k → 8%CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
WY
OH
CA
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 27% of The Stone Foundation of Michigan’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Stone Foundation of Michiganlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 26% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 30 repeat orgs$355k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
12

Total granted

$2.9M
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+109%

Still filing today

57%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $320k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureInternationalEducationCrime & LegalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM
    4× · 2021–2024 · $535k · revenue +39%
  • SF
    STARFISH FAMILY SERVICES INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $175k · revenue +26%
  • CS
    CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN
    4× · 2020–2023 · $65k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • BI
    BLESSING IN A BACKPACK
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • OM
    OAKLAND MEDIATION CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +109%
  • C
    COTS
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
2
Jewish Federation of Detroit

The jewish federation of detroit is the cornerstone of our jewish community. we are committed to taking care of the needs of the jewish people and building a strong and vibrant jewish future, in detroit, in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
3
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
4
Detroit Jews for Justice

Djj advances racial and economic justice by developing metro detroit jews as community organizers who fight for transformative policy change in deep partnership with neighbors

Civil Rights
5
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
6
Jfa Non-Profit Housing Corporation

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

Housing & Shelter
7
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

8
The Jewish Studio Project

Through thought leadership, community programs, leadership development, and organizational partnerships, jsp is building a movement to activate the creative power of the jewish community.

Religion
9
Jewish Federation of Greater Ann Arbor

The federation provides and inspires philanthropic leadership and community-building to nurture a strong, engaged, connected, vibrant, and enduring jewish community locally, in israel, and around the world.

Philanthropy
10
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
11
Jewish Apartments and Services Inc

Jewish senior life of metropolitan detroit is dedicated to enhancing the quality of life for older adults of the metropolitan detroit jewish community through the provision of personalized high quality programs and services that support…

Human Services
12
Jewish Family Services

To help individuals and families achieve economic self-sufficiency and emotional stability.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Jewish Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Sphinx Organization Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%4%<5yr15%0%5–10yr18%11%10–20yr17%19%20–35yr14%33%35–55yr14%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr18%4%10–20yr17%2%20–35yr14%26%35–55yr14%68%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
15%
4,483/29,581

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
18/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BEAUMONT FOUNDATION — $478,000 · OtherBEAUMONT FOUNDATIONAIE FOUNDATION — $472,000 · OtherAIE FOUNDATIONCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $155,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONCARE HOUSE OF OAKLAND — $142,000 · OtherCARE HOUSE OF OAKLANDTHE HENRY FORD — $100,000 · OtherTHE HENRY FORD+27 more — $372,700 · Other+27 moreHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $535,000 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH …AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE — $300,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRA…FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $61,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF TH…The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $33,000 · InternationalThe American …STARFISH FAMILY SERVICES INC — $175,000 · Human ServicesSTARFISH F…CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN — $65,000 · Human ServicesCHILD SAFE…OAKLAND FAMILY SERVICES — $45,000 · Human ServicesOAKLAND FA…+2 more — $6,000 · Human ServicesDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $120,000 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureSPHINX ORGANIZATION INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR JEWISH CULTURE & CREATIVITY — $5,000 · Arts & CultureGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $135,000 · Food & NutritionANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $61,000 · Civil Rights
Other$1,719,700Health$535,000International$394,000Human Services$291,000Arts & Culture$145,000Food & Nutrition$135,000Civil Rights$61,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $535,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE — $300,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTARFISH FAMILY SERVICES INC — $175,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $135,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $120,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD SAFE MICHIGAN — $65,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $61,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $61,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOAKLAND FAMILY SERVICES — $45,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $33,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGESHER HUMAN SERVICES — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $22,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYAD EZRA — $20,600 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $17,800 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHAVEN INC — $13,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPHINX ORGANIZATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBEYOND BASICS — $8,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK — $5,300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRED TENT FUND — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOAKLAND MEDIATION CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCENTER FOR JEWISH CULTURE & CREATIVITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHumble Design Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBEDS FOR KIDS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
  • Who funds STARFISH FAMILY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN
  • Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
  • Who funds CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OAKLAND FAMILY SERVICES
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
  • Who funds GESHER HUMAN SERVICES
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC
  • Who funds YAD EZRA
  • Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO
  • Who funds HAVEN INC
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds SPHINX ORGANIZATION INC
  • Who funds BEYOND BASICS
  • Who funds JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK
  • Who funds RED TENT FUND
  • Who funds OAKLAND MEDIATION CENTER INC
  • Who funds CENTER FOR JEWISH CULTURE & CREATIVITY
  • Who funds DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Eugene Applebaum Family FoundationMI20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation Corporation · Malcolm and Beth Lowenstein Foundation · Edward C and Linda Dresner Levy Foundation · United Jewish Foundation · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Sylvia Pevin and George Pevin Foundation · The Irving and Ethel Palman Foundation · Grosfeld Foundation · Deroy Testamentary Foundation · Marjorie and Maxwell Jospey Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Stone Foundation of Michigan funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • City Year Inc11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph