Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sylvester and Stanhope Foster Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$94k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$80kRecreation & Sports$72kHuman Services$67kEducation$56kFood & Nutrition$49kCrime & Legal$48kScience & Tech$30kAnimals$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $79k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$768k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK$25,000
PISCATAQUA YOUTH SAILING$12,000
DOVER CHILDRENS HOME$12,000
ROCKINGHAM NUTRITION & MEALS ON WHEELS$10,000
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NH$10,000
THE COPPER MOUNTAIN CAMP$10,000
BIGELOW LABORATORY FOR OCIEAN SCIENCES$5,000
EASTER SEALS - VETERANS COUNT$5,000
BERWICK ACADEMY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%EASTER SEALS OF NH: $5k → 7%NH FOOD BANK: $10k → 7%NH FOOD BANK: $5k → 7%THE SEACOAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $2k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$413k · 13 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
6

Total granted

$413k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+83%

Still filing today

38%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCivil RightsScience & TechHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DOVER CHILDRENS HOME INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $62k · revenue +50%
  • CA
    COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $48k · revenue +5%
  • BL
    Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences
    6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +116%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF AINEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +344%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +83%
  • ES
    Easter Seals New Hampshire Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
2
Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Concord Christian Academy

Concord Christian Academy is a life preparatory educational institution that works in harmony with families to promote the spiritual, intellectual, emotional, physical and creative growth of students, empowering them to live for the glory…

Education
4
New England Center for Investigative Reporting Inc
—
5
Seacoast Christian School

Seacoast Christian School is a private not-for-profit non-boarding Christian school. In addition to striving for academic excellence, it seeks to teach students to be life-long servants of God and to live out their faith in all area of…

Education
6
David's House Inc

To provide a home away from home and support for families with children receiving treatment through the children's hospital at dartmouth-hitchcock medical center.

Health
7
Bridgton Academy

To provide a program for young men in a unique, one-year postgraduate environment to prepare for the rigors of college and beyond.

Education
8
The Rippowam Cisqua School Inc

Rippowam Cisqua School creates independent thinkers, confident communicators, and engaged leaders who respect and contribute meaningfully to a diverse and increasingly complex global society.

Education
9
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
10
Merrimack Valley Day Care Service

Daycare services

—
11
The Oliverian School Inc

Oliverian is a non-profit, alternative, college-prep boarding school for adolescents who have not thrived in traditional settings. we fill the gap between traditional and therapeutic schools, providing the right mix of support and guided…

Education
12
The River School

Independent school offering programs for infants, toddlers, preschool, and elementary school aged children with and without hearing loss.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dover Childrens Home Inc; the most unlike its peers is Piscataqua Youth Sailing Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDRENS HOSPITAL DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK: $70,000 · OtherCHILDRENS HOSPITAL DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCKDOVER CHILDRENS HOME INC: $62,000 · OtherDOVER CHILDRENS HOME INCTHE COPPER MOUNTAIN CAMP: $44,500 · OtherTHE COPPER MOUNTAIN CAMPROCKINGHAM NUTRITION & MEALS ON WHEELS: $34,000 · OtherROCKINGHAM NUTRITION & MEALS ON WHEELSEASTER SEALS - VETERANS COUNT: $25,000 · OtherEASTER SEALS - VETERANS COUNTJ JOSEPH SHANLEY SCHOLARSHIP FD: $22,000 · OtherJ JOSEPH SHANLEY SCHOLARSHIP FDPISCATAQUA YOUTH SAILING: $22,000 · OtherPISCATAQUA YOUTH SAILINGIndividual grant recipient: $11,000 · Other+2 more: $12,500 · OtherCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC: $47,500 · Civil RightsCOURT APPOIN…Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences: $30,000 · Science & TechBERWICK ACADEMY: $20,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $15,000 · Human ServicesEaster Seals New Hampshire Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesSeacoast Community School: $1,500 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF AINE: $10,000 · HealthPiscataqua Youth Sailing Association: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$303,000Civil Rights$47,500Science & Tech$30,000Education$30,000Human Services$21,500Health$10,000Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDOVER CHILDRENS HOME INC: $62,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC: $47,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBERWICK ACADEMY: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF AINE: $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEaster Seals New Hampshire Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeacoast Community School: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DOVER CHILDRENS HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC ↗
  • Who funds Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences ↗
  • Who funds BERWICK ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds New Hampshire Catholic Charities ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF AINE ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Easter Seals New Hampshire Inc ↗
  • Who funds Piscataqua Youth Sailing Association ↗
  • Who funds Seacoast Community School ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · Southern New Hampshire University · Granite United Way · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sylvester and Stanhope Foster Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sylvester and Stanhope Foster Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sylvester and Stanhope Foster’s filings →

    More from the funding graph