Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sybil Smith Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$467k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$2.9MArts & Culture$394kEducation$94kHealth$58kEnvironment$53kInternational$15kReligion$10kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $112k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$33,169
Median grant
2
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUMAS WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER$300,000
NORTHWEST FLORIDA BALLET$50,000
ALABAMA SCHOOL OF MATH AND SCIENCE$46,000
MONROE COUNTY HERITAGE MUSEUM$33,169
MOBILE BOTANICAL GARDENS$12,500
PROVIDENCE FOUNDATION$10,000
MOBILE MUSEUM OF ART$10,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY OF ALABAMA$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%ADOPTION ROCKS: $5k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 14 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +79% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
16

Total granted

$3.4M
$130k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+11%

Still filing today

50%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NF
    NORTHWEST FLORIDA BALLET INC
    4× · 2018–2024 · $200k · revenue +16%
  • MC
    MONROE COUNTY HERITAGE MUSEUM
    4× · 2018–2024 · $127k · revenue +100%
  • MM
    MOBILE MUSEUM OF ART INC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $22k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • AF
    Alabama Forest Land Trust Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +194%
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF 1868 INC
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -40%
  • FT
    Feeding the Gulf Coast
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mobile Symphony Inc

The purpose of the organization is to make lives better through music by producing and promoting symphonic music and delivering music education programs throughout Alabama and the Gulf Coast region.

Arts & Culture
2
Mobile Baykeeper Inc

Provide citizens a means to protect the beauty, health and heritage of the Mobile Bay Watershed, Alabamas waterways and coastal communities.

Environment
3
Mobile United Inc

To present a forum for business and citizens where an exchange of ideas can occur that will make Mobile a better place to live, work and do business.

Community Improvement
4
South Alabama Land Trust Inc

The South Alabama Land Trust protects land and promotes environmental education in coastal Alabama so current and future residents can enjoy clean water and the seafood, wildlife, and outdoor recreation that define our area.

Environment
5
Conservation Al Foundation Inc

To build the ability of Alabama citizens and organizations to promote conservation through government and civic action.

Education
6
Monroevillemonroe County Economic Development Auth

Economic development authority for monroeville, al and monroe county.

Community Improvement
7
Mothers Milk Bank of Alabama

Oversee and facilitate the collection, pasteurization, and distribution of human milk. Provide training and education for healthcare providers and community members about the health importance of human milk for neonates and infants.

Human Services
8
Alabama Rivers Alliance Inc

Alabama Rivers Alliance is a statewide network of groups working to protect and restore all of Alabama's water resources through building partnerships, empowering citizens, and advocating for sound water policy and its enforcement.

Environment
9
Cultural Arts Center Inc

To coordinate and to encourage cultural endeavors and to promote knowledge and appreciation of the arts and humanities in southeast alabama.

Arts & Culture
10
Alabama Coastal Heritage Trust

Acquire, preserve, protect, restore, manage & improve alabama lands & water of ecological, scientific, scenic, wildlife or recreational significance. conduct, sponsor, and encourage, engage in ecological study & research. support…

Environment
11
Family Counseling Center of Mobile Inc

The Center operates in Southwest Alabama providing counseling and guidance to individuals, families, and groups experiencing problems related to stress, family discord, parenting, phobias, aging, rape, and financial difficulties.

Human Services
12
Historic Mobile Preservation Society Inc

To create tangible links to the past for the benefit of present and future generations.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mobile Arts Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is Build a Better Community. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DUMAS WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $2,705,000 · OtherDUMAS WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER+15 more: $421,092 · Other+15 moreNORTHWEST FLORIDA BALLET INC: $200,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHWEST FL…MONROE COUNTY HERITAGE MUSEUM: $126,669 · Arts & CultureMONROE COUNT…SOCIETY OF 1868 INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureSOCIETY OF 1…MOBILE MUSEUM OF ART INC: $22,000 · Arts & CultureMOBILE MUSEU…+3 more: $18,000 · Arts & CultureBuild A Better Community: $15,000 · Community ImprovementMAIN STREET MOBILE INC: $7,500 · Community ImprovementALABAMA COASTAL FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · EnvironmentALABAMA AUDUBON: $5,000 · EnvironmentFeeding the Gulf Coast: $10,000 · Food & NutritionCOASTAL ALABAMA PARTNERSHIP: $10,000 · Public Safety & DisasterMobile Area Interfaith Conference: $10,000 · EducationAdoption Rocks Inc: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$3,126,092Arts & Culture$391,669Community Improvement$22,500Environment$13,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Public Safety & Disaster$10,000Education$10,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUMAS WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER: $2,705,000 over 7y, 41% of budgetNORTHWEST FLORIDA BALLET INC: $200,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetMONROE COUNTY HERITAGE MUSEUM: $126,669 over 4y, 23% of budgetAlabama Forest Land Trust Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOCIETY OF 1868 INC: $25,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetMOBILE MUSEUM OF ART INC: $22,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBuild A Better Community: $15,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetPROVIDENCE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetFeeding the Gulf Coast: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOASTAL ALABAMA PARTNERSHIP: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetMOBILE OPERA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetALABAMA COASTAL FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMAIN STREET MOBILE INC: $7,500 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetALABAMA AUDUBON: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMobile Arts Council Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMobile International Festival Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUMAS WESLEY COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST FLORIDA BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds MONROE COUNTY HERITAGE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Alabama Forest Land Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF 1868 INC ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
  • Who funds Build A Better Community ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Feeding the Gulf Coast ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL ALABAMA PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE OPERA INC ↗
  • Who funds Mobile Area Interfaith Conference ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA COASTAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MAIN STREET MOBILE INC ↗
  • Who funds Adoption Rocks Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA AUDUBON ↗
  • Who funds Mobile Arts Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds Mobile International Festival Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alabama Power Foundation IncAL27.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · J L Bedsole Foundation Regions Bank Co-Trustee · Hearin - Chandler Foundation · The Ben May Charitable Trust Hancock Whitney Bank Successor Trustee · Crampton Trust #1255000731 Regions Bank Trustee · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Mary J Larkins Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sybil Smith Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sybil Smith Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Sybil Smith Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Sybil Smith Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sybil Smith’s filings →

    More from the funding graph