· Private foundation
The Swan Family Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k16 grants · $76k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $177k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $88k
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC | $250,000 |
| CONCERNED CITIZENS OF JACK CO INC | $87,500 |
| JACK COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION | $49,950 |
| JACKSBORO YOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATION | $35,000 |
| FREED PEOPLE | $20,000 |
| FRIENDS OF FORT RICHARDSON ASSOCIATION | $20,000 |
| GLADYS JOHNSON RITCHIE PUBLIC LIBRARY INC | $11,858 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| 1HOPE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL | $10,000 |
| LOVE LIKE YOU MEAN IT INTL | $10,000 |
| BIO-MEDICAL FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| T Ward | $6,500 |
| H Reger | $6,500 |
| TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
| SOUTH TEXAS CHILDRENS HOME MINISTRIES | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $393k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $108k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCONCERNED CITIZENS OF JACK CO INC8× · 2017–2024 · $308k · revenue +78%
- TSTARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $305k · revenue +51%
- JCJACK COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION8× · 2017–2024 · $295k · revenue +9% · 51% of their budget
Funded once
- JFJACKSBORO FFA BOOSTER CLUBone grant, 2021 · $100k
- PCPERRIN-WHITT COMMUNITY CLUBone grant, 2021 · $20k
- CCCOWBOY CHRISTIAN MISSIONSone grant, 2021 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide the highest quality of appropriate investigative, assessment, and ongoing thrapeutic treatment services for abused chilren and their families throught the four county service area (victoria, jackson, goliad, and dewitt).
Spread the Gospel.
Rehabilitation facility for alcoholics
A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.
Volunteer fire department organized to contain fires in and around the city of tolar, county of hood, texas
Half way house for diagnostic evaluation, treatment, shelter, counseling, educational program, and rehabilitation of alcoholics and drug addicts.
Cowboy at the cross ministries is an evangelical, outreach ministry. gathering strays, allowing god to change our ways, to walk in truth and holiness.
Crime Stop.
Provide fire fighting & ambulance service to hankamer, texas and surrounding areas.
To share the hope and love of Jesus with women in the adult entertainment industry
Aid to sexually and physically abused children
Manage and conduct community fair for trinity, texas and promote sale of local students livestock raised for fair
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jacksboro Vision Group Inc and the most unlike its peers is Concerned Citizens of Jack Co Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 15% of your grantees by number, and just 30% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JACKSBORO VISION GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds FATIH COMMUNITY HOSPITAL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CONCERNED CITIZENS OF JACK CO INC ↗
- Who funds TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JACK COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds JACKSBORO YOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Jacksboro High School Ex-Students Association ↗
- Who funds PROJECT 4031 INC ↗
- Who funds GLADYS JOHNSON RITCHIE PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds Freed People ↗
- Who funds WISE CCC ↗
- Who funds STANDING TOGETHER ON METH PREVENTION ↗
- Who funds LOVE LIKE YOU MEAN IT INTL ↗
- Who funds 1HOPE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Wise County Domestic Violence Task Force ↗
- Who funds RED ANGUS STAKEHOLDERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHINE ON INC ↗
- Who funds HORNS 4 HOPE ↗
- Who funds DIFFERENT DAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KIDS ON THE LAND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Swan Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Swan Family Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Swan Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.