Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Susan a and Kevin P Grelling Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$29kCommunity Improvement$15kPublic Benefit$13kHousing & Shelter$12kPhilanthropy$5kAnimals$4kCivil Rights$4kArts & Culture$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$149k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST ANDREWS LUTHERAN CHURCH$10,000
MPR$1,320
FRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI$1,200
TPT$1,200
WABASHA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$1,000
MATTHEW SHEPARD FOUNDATION$500
Individual grant recipient$308
BUFFALO LAKE LUTHERAN CHURCH$74
WABASHA LUTHERAN CHURCH$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 53% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 7%HAHN MEMORIAL BL ZION LUTHERAN: $1k → 5%ST PAUL'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $3k → 5%ST ANDREWS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $10k → 6%ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $1k → 6%WABASHA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $950 → 11%ANIMAL SHELTER: $1k → 14%MATTHEW SHEPARD FOUNDATION: $500 → 11%ST ANDREW'S CHURCH: $5k → 6%THE MUSEUM OF RUSSIAN ART: $500 → 11%CARING FOR CATS: $1k → 14%ST ANDREWS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $3k → 6%FFA BLUE JACKETS: $1k → 8%TWIN CITIES PADDLESPORTS: $567 → 14%ST ANDREWS CHURCH: $3k → 6%PATTERSON COMPANIES FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%MN FFA BLUE JACKETS: $1k → 8%GIVE TO THE MAX MN: $5k → 11%TWIN CITIES PADDLESPORTS: $500 → 14%SAINT ANDREW'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $3k → 6%PATTERSON COMPANIES FOUNDATION: $4k → 6%ACLU: $1k → 11%HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 6%PATTERSON COMPANIES FOUNDATION: $700 → 6%READS LANDING HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $656 → 8%ACLU: $1k → 11%READS LANDING HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $656 → 8%ACLU: $1k → 11%NARAL PRO-CHOICE: $655 → 14%HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 → 11%AVENUES FOR YOUTH: $6k → 11%AVENUES FOR YOUTH: $4k → 11%AVENUES FOR YOUTH: $1k → 11%MPR: $1k → 14%AVENUES FOR YOUTH: $802 → 11%TPT: $1k → 14%SECOND HARVEST: $2k → 11%MPR: $400 → 14%MPR: $400 → 14%TCGMC: $2k → 11%PROJECT SUCCESS: $1k → 11%PROJECT SUCCESS: $1k → 11%PROJECT SUCCESS: $865 → 11%TCGMC: $535 → 11%TCGMC: $400 → 11%FRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI: $1k → 14%FRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER: $474 → 14%MINNESOTA FFA: $850 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$72k · 23 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
25

Total granted

$72k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+20%

Still filing today

26%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $932 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureCivil RightsEducationYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AVENUES FOR YOUTH
    4× · 2020–2023 · $12k · revenue +107%
  • PS
    PROJECT SUCCESS
    3× · 2017–2020 · $3k · revenue +130%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER
    2× · 2021–2023 · $794 · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • GT
    GIVE TO THE MAX MN
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • SP
    ST PAUL'S LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • SA
    SAINT ANDREW'S LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
2
Achieve Twin Cities

As one of the upper midwest's leading career and college readiness organizations, achieve twin cities rallies community support and delivers best-in-class programs to inspire and equip young people in minneapolis and saint paul, minnesota…

Youth Development
3
The Great Northern Winter Festival

The great northern celebrates our cold, creative winters through ten days of diverse programming that invigorate mind and body. in an era of changing climate that threatens our signature season, we seek to create community, inspire action,…

Arts & Culture
4
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
5
Park Square Theatre

To enrich the community by producing and presenting exceptional live theatre that touches the heart, engages the mind and delights the spirit.

—
6
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
7
Theater Mu Incorporated

Theater mu produces great performances born of arts, equity, and justice from the heart of the asian american experience.

Arts & Culture
8
Minnesota Women Lawyers

To advance the success of women attorneys and strive for a just society.

—
9
Leadership Matters Mn

Leadership matters mn is focused on advancing a policy agenda that places working minnesotans first. we support economic growth, job creation and equitable tax and education policies that will allow every minnesotan to thrive.

Education
10
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
11
Future Problem Solving Program International Inc

Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…

—
12
The Minnesota Daily

1. provide independent student journalism and comprehensive coverage of news, media and events that serve the public interest and inform the university of minnesota community.2. offer a forum for the free exchange of ideas and civil debate…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Caring for Cats Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PATTERSON COMPANIES FOUNDATION: $14,950 · OtherPATTERSON COMPANIES FOUNDATIONST ANDREWS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $13,000 · OtherST ANDREWS LUTHERAN CHURCHST ANDREWS CHURCH: $8,000 · OtherST ANDREWS CHURCHGIVE TO THE MAX MN: $5,188 · OtherGIVE TO THE MAX MNACLU: $3,383 · OtherST PAUL'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $3,000 · OtherSAINT ANDREW'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $3,000 · OtherTCGMC: $2,835 · Other+33 more: $24,625 · Other+33 moreAVENUES FOR YOUTH: $11,758 · Youth DevelopmentAVENUES FOR Y…PROJECT SUCCESS: $2,865 · EducationTHE MUSEUM OF RUSSIAN ART: $607 · Arts & CultureASHLAND PRODUCTIONS INC: $300 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA: $225 · Arts & CultureTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $100 · Arts & CultureCARING FOR CATS INC: $1,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER: $794 · EnvironmentMATTHEW SHEPARD FOUNDATION: $500 · Civil RightsANN BANCROFT FOUNDATION: $214 · Civil RightsFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $40 · International
Other$77,981Youth Development$11,758Education$2,865Arts & Culture$1,232Animals$1,000Environment$794Civil Rights$714International$40

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAVENUES FOR YOUTH: $11,758 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT SUCCESS: $2,865 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER: $794 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc: $720 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF RUSSIAN ART: $607 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMATTHEW SHEPARD FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAN DO CANINES: $299 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA: $225 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANN BANCROFT FOUNDATION: $214 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MINNESOTA: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $40 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AVENUES FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT SUCCESS ↗
  • Who funds CARING FOR CATS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER ↗
  • Who funds Electronic Frontier Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE MUSEUM OF RUSSIAN ART ↗
  • Who funds MATTHEW SHEPARD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASHLAND PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds CAN DO CANINES ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds ANN BANCROFT FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL17.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Graco Foundation · Margaret a Cargill Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Susan a and Kevin P Grelling Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Susan a and Kevin P Grelling Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Susan a and Kevin P Grelling’s filings →

    More from the funding graph