Loading…
· Public charity
THE SUMMIT LEAGUE
To raise funds in the areas of arts, education, health and/or welfare to benefit charitable organizations in santa clara county.
$60k
Granted FY2024
6
Grants
1
Communities
$13k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.
Health$424kEducation$226kHuman Services$180kHousing & Shelter$10kFood & Nutrition$8kOther$15k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
research battlebattle againstagainst alzheimer'salzheimer's disease
2021
—
2023
groupsrecovery
2024
hungerpartnersjusticewandamothers
2025
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 6 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $53k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$418k
Total assets
Largest grants
- HUNGER AT HOME$12,500
- LOS GATOS MUSEUM ASSOCIATION$10,000
- AMIGOS DE GUADALUPE CENTER FOR JUSTICE & EMPOWERMENT$10,000
- WEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES$10,000
- MOMENTUM FOR HEALTH$10,000
- WANDA$7,500
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $180k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Hunger Action Los Angeles Inc
Hunger action los angeles ends hunger and promotes healthy eating through the market match program at 22 farmers markets, publication of peoples guide to welfare, health and other services, and involvement with low income residents in…
Education
2
Mentis
Mentis provides bilingual professional mental health services to people throughout the county of every age stage and income level.
Human Services
3
Los Angeles County
To assist persons with developmental disabilities.
Human Services
4
Alzheimer's Greater Los Angeles
Alzheimer's Greater Los Angeles' mission is to improve the lives of local families affected by Alzheimer's & other dementias by increasing awareness, delivering effective programs & services, providing compassionate support, advocating for…
Health
5
Women's Center for Advancement
Helping individuals and their families stay safe and grow strong.
Human Services
6
Adagio Health Inc
Adagio health provides health and wellness services to women and their families.
Health
7
The Women's Center
The mission of The Women's Center is to significantly improve the mental health and well-being of all members of our community through counseling, education, and support - regardless of ability to pay.
—
8
Meals on Wheels by Acc
Our mission is to enhance the dignity and quality of life of Sacramento area older adults through nutritional programs that include assessment of needs, education, supportive services and assistance to families and caregivers.
Food & Nutrition
9
Altamed Health Services Corporation
See schedule o : to eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic and underserved communities in…
Health
10
Houston Area Women's Center
To help those affected by domestic and sexual violence to move their lives forward.
Human Services
11
Cascadia Health
Cascadia health delivers whole health care - integrated mental health and addiction services, primary care, and housing - to support our communities and provide hope and well-being for those we serve.
Health
12
Metropolitan Area Neighborhood Nutrition
Manna uses nutrition to improve health for people with serious illnesses who need nourishment to heal. by providing medically tailored meals and nutrition education, we empower people to improve their health and quality of life.
Food & Nutrition
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Valley Community Services and the most unlike its peers is Hunger At Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$424,400Education$226,000Human Services$180,000Other$15,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Food & Nutrition$8,300
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RESPITE AND RESEARCH FOR ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE ↗
- Who funds PURSUIT OF EXCELLENCE ↗
- Who funds BILL WILSON CNETER ↗
- Who funds THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds HUNGER AT HOME ↗
- Who funds WEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds LOS GATOS MUSEUM ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds AMIGOS DE GUADALUPE CENTER FOR JUSTICE & EMPOWERMENT ↗
- Who funds MOMENTUM FOR HEALTH ↗
- Who funds LOAVES & FISHES ↗
- Who funds WANDA ↗
- Who funds EATING DISORDERS RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds PARISI HOUSE ON THE HILL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA23.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Los Altos Mountain View · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Health Trust · Second Harvest of Silicon Valley · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Star One Credit Union · Destination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Sunlight Giving · Sutter Bay Hospitals · United Way of the Bay Area
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation THE SUMMIT LEAGUE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PURSUIT OF EXCELLENCE.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~29 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 4 filed years.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 474727641 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on PURSUIT OF EXCELLENCE, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 29 months of cash on hand.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 56% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to The Summit League?
Find your warmest path to The Summit League through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines