Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sujata and Sanjiv Narayan Foundation Sanjiv Narayan Et Al Trustees

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$227k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.4MFood & Nutrition$105kHealth$36kReligion$30kInternational$27kAnimals$1k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $1k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $216k
$53,503
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN SCHOOL IN LONDON FOUNDATION$56,002
SERRA HIGH SCHOOL$55,003
SILICON VALLEY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL$53,503
NOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL$51,002
PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK$10,001
EN POINTE AGAINST BRAIN CANCER$1,001
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 24% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL: $57k → 7%INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF THE PENINSULA: $115k → 8%FEEDING AMERICA: $100k → 11%PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK: $15k → 14%BRITISH SCHOOLS & UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION: $100k → 17%CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $27k → 9%NOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL: $56k → 7%INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF THE PENINSULA: $112k → 8%PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK: $10k → 14%BRITISH SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC: $81k → 17%NOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL: $52k → 7%INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF THE PENINSULA: $93k → 8%PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK: $10k → 14%BRITISH SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION: $21k → 17%NOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL: $51k → 7%SILICON VALLEY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL: $78k → 8%BRITISH SCHOOLS AND UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%NOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL: $50k → 7%SILICON VALLEY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL: $77k → 8%SERRA HIGH SCHOOL: $81k → 7%SILICON VALLEY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL: $54k → 8%SERRA HIGH SCHOOL: $55k → 7%INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF THE PENINSULA: $31k → 8%SERRA HIGH SCHOOL: $52k → 7%SILICON VALLEY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL: $30k → 8%ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM: $5k → 8%PETS IN NEED: $1k → 8%HINDU TEMPLE SOUTH BAY: $30k → 8%PLAYING AT LEARNING: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 6 repeat orgs$142k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +107% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
5

Total granted

$1.4M
$141k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+107%
+3%

Still filing today

67%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalFood & NutritionAnimalsHealthScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    SILICON VALLEY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $589k · revenue +107%
  • ND
    NOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL
    5× · 2020–2024 · $266k
  • BS
    BRITISH SCHOOLS & UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $212k · revenue +136%

Funded once

  • FA
    FEEDING AMERICA
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • HT
    HINDU TEMPLE OF SOUTH BAY
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • EH
    ECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
2
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
3
German International School of Silicon Valley

The school has committed itself to ensuring students reach their full academic potential in a nuturing environment that fosters critical and imaginative thinking, a passion for lifelong learning, and an appreciation for cultural diversity.

Education
4
California Institute for BioMedical Research

Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…

—
5
The British Academy of Film and Television Arts North America Inc

The specific purposes for which bafta na is organized is to promote, maintain, improve and advance original and creative work among individuals employed professionally in film and television production and allied industries, to create and…

Arts & Culture
6
French American School of Silicon Valley

To provide our students with an academically excellent bilingual and bicultural education which empowers them to succeed in both the french and american education systems and to fully realize their potential as global citizens. (see sch o…

Education
7
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
8
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
9
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
10
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

—
11
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
12
Marin Academy

Marin academy asks every individual to think, question, and create in an environment of encouragement and compassion, and challenges each person to accept the responsibilities posed by education in a democratic society.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American School in London Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Playing At Learning. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SILICON VALLEY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL: $588,857 · OtherSILICON VALLEY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLNOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOL: $266,011 · OtherNOTRE DAME HIGH SCHOOLSERRA HIGH SCHOOL: $188,012 · OtherSERRA HIGH SCHOOLFEEDING AMERICA: $100,001 · OtherFEEDING AMERICA+2 more: $31,002 · OtherBRITISH SCHOOLS & UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC: $212,106 · InternationalBRITISH SCHOOLS & UNIV…American School in London Foundation: $99,002 · InternationalAmerican School in Lon…PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $35,003 · HealthCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $27,175 · PhilanthropyECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM: $5,001 · Food & NutritionPLAYING AT LEARNING: $4,501 · Science & TechPets In Need: $1,001 · Animals
Other$1,173,883International$311,108Health$35,003Philanthropy$27,175Food & Nutrition$5,001Science & Tech$4,501Animals$1,001

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSILICON VALLEY INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL: $588,857 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetBRITISH SCHOOLS & UNIVERSITIES FOUNDATION INC: $212,106 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetAmerican School in London Foundation: $99,002 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $35,003 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $27,175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetECUMENICAL HUNGER PROGRAM: $5,001 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPets In Need: $1,001 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY14.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Bright Funds Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sujata and Sanjiv Narayan Foundation Sanjiv Narayan Et Al Trustees funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sujata and Sanjiv Narayan Foundation Sanjiv Narayan Et Al Trustees. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sujata and Sanjiv Narayan Foundation Sanjiv Narayan Et Al Trustees’ filings →

    More from the funding graph