How much did THE STUECK FAMILY FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 68% of THE STUECK FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

equalvaluesprepare

2020

equalchildren

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k18 grants · $77k
$10k–50k14 grants · $260k

$5,500

Median grant

States reached

$10M

Total assets

Largest grants

NATURE CONSERVANCY KS CHAPTER$35,000
NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION$30,000
HOPE FAITH MINISTRIES$25,000
HARVESTERS$25,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS$25,000
SALVATION ARMY$20,000
MAYO CLINIC DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT$20,000
KAUFFMAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS$20,000
KCUR$10,000
OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
ROSE BROOKS CENTER$10,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$10,000
KANSAS CITY PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM$10,000
PET RESOURCE CENTER KANSAS CITY$7,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $186k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 11%. 92% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.1M · 45 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

45 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.1M

$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%

+45%

Still filing today

38%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHousing & ShelterHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PP
PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS
6× · 2019–2024 · $105k · revenue +35%
NG
NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION
6× · 2019–2024 · $95k · revenue +12%
RB
ROSE BROOKS CENTER
8× · 2017–2024 · $68k · revenue +51%

Funded once

WO
WORLD OUTREACH FOUNDATION
one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -54%
UF
UMKC FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +364%
TG
THE GROOMING PROJECT
one grant, 2021 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Kansas Medical Foundation

Develop public educational programs promoting medicine.

Education

Kansas Pharmacy Foundation

The kansas pharmacy foundation is organized exclusively for scientific and education purposes to further the welfare and integrity of the profession of pharmacy and for the enhancement of public health.

Health

Health Care Foundation of Greater Kc

To achieve health equity & secure a fair & just region through leadership,advocacy,& resources

Health

Kansas City Hospice Foundation

To bring expert care, peace of mind, comfort, guidance and hope to people who are affected by serious illness or by grief.

Health

Greater Kansas City Community Foundation

The greater kansas city community foundation helps donors create their charitable legacies, so they can make the world a better place.

Philanthropy

Care Center of Kansas City

Swope ridge geriatric center is a not for-profit corporation whose mission is to provide a continuum of long term care services to our community. we are committed to delivering quality health care with compassion and caring for adult…

—

University of Kansas Medical Alumni

Alumni association

—

Kansas Pet Protection Foundation

Animals

Heart of Kansas Family Health Care Inc

To provide health care to those who do not qualify for the medicaid program and do not have the financial resources to purchase insurance or health care services themselves.

Health

The Kansas City Royals Foundation

The kansas city royals foundation (kcrf) conducts fundraising to support children in the greater kansas city community, education, youth baseball/softball, and military.

Philanthropy

Community Health Center of Se Kansas

To provide quality, affordable, accessible medical, dental and behavioral health care to anyone regardless of ability to pay.

Health

Kansas City University

Kcu is a community of professionals committed to excellence in the education of highly qualified students in osteopathic medicine, dental medicine and health professions.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Faith Ministries Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Nelson Gallery Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/25

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,540

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

22/22

Grantees still filing

16/22

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,460,600Arts & Culture$216,250Human Services$186,236Health$115,000Environment$44,000Animals$36,000Housing & Shelter$30,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO25.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · The Sunderland Foundation · G Kenneth and Ann Baum Philanthropic · Marion and Henry Bloch Family Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · Heart to Heart International · Health Care Foundation of Greater Kc · Ge Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE STUECK FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: FAITH LOVE HOPE WIN.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 432081392 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on FAITH LOVE HOPE WIN, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 89% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Stueck Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Stueck Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE STUECK FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Stueck Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph

THE STUECK FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Stueck Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph