Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Stueck Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$403k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$62k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Environment$500kHealth$454kArts & Culture$396kHuman Services$294kHousing & Shelter$265kInternational$162kFood & Nutrition$145kAnimals$97kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $69k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $272k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $62k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$9.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPE FAITH MINISTRIES$62,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY KS CHAPTER$35,000
NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION$30,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS$30,000
HARVESTERS$27,000
MAYO CLINIC DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT$20,000
SALVATION ARMY$20,000
KAUFFMAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS$20,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$10,000
OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
KCUR$10,000
ROSE BROOKS CENTER$10,000
PET RESOURCE CENTER KANSAS CITY$10,000
VIBRANT HEALTH CARE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $293k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 15%HOPE FAITH MINISTRIES: $62k → 15%HOPE FAITH MINISTRIES: $45k → 15%HOPE FAITH MINISTRIES: $30k → 15%HOPE FAITH MINISTRIES: $25k → 15%HOPE FAITH MINISTRIES: $15k → 15%HOPE FAITH MINISTRIES: $12k → 15%HOPE FAITH MINISTRIES: $10k → 15%HOPE FAITH MINISTRIES: $10k → 15%HOPE FAITH MINISTRIES: $10k → 15%FAITH LOVE HOPE WIN: $2k → 5%FAITH LOVE HOPE WIN: $2k → 5%FAITH LOVE HOPE WIN: $2k → 5%FAITH LOVE HOPE WIN: $2k → 5%FAITH LOVE HOPE WIN: $2k → 5%FAITH LOVE HOPE WIN: $2k → 5%FAITH LOVE HOPE WIN: $2k → 5%FAITH LOVE HOPE WIN: $2k → 5%CORNERSTONE OF CARE: $6k → 15%CORNERSTONE OF CARE: $4k → 15%CORNERSTONE OF CARE: $3k → 15%CORNERSTONE OF CARE: $3k → 15%CORNERSTONE OF CARE: $3k → 15%CORNERSTONE OF CARE: $3k → 15%CORNERSTONE OF CARE: $3k → 15%CORNERSTONE OF CARE: $3k → 15%CORNERSTONE OF CARE: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
MA
NJ
MO
VA
KS
TN
AL
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of The Stueck Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Stueck Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 45 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

45 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
10

Total granted

$2.3M
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+50%

Still filing today

58%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationInternationalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HT
    HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $145k · revenue +40%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $135k · revenue +105%
  • TN
    THE NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $125k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • SN
    SIGMA NU EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -8%
  • HO
    HEALTH OUTREACH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -54%
  • UF
    UMKC FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +278%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas City Care Clinic

The mission of kc care health center is to promote health and wellness by providing quality care, access, research and education to the underserved and all people in our community.

2
The Ku Endowment Charitable Gift Fund

To strengthen the University and communities that have touched the lives of KU alumni and friends, the mission of The KU Endowment Charitable Gift Fund is to receive and administer gifts and bequests to further the charitable objectives of…

Philanthropy
3
Sunflower Foundation Health Care for Kansans

To assist the state of kansas in helping to improve the health of all kansans, particularly those unserved or underserved.

Health
4
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
5
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

6
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
7
University Health Physicians

University health physicians provides quality and compassionate healthcare in an environment of academic excellence.

Health
8
Kansas Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.

Health
9
Manhattan Community Health Foundation

To promote health in the manhattan, kansas community and the surrounding areas in a manner not inconsistent with the mission of via christi hospital of manhattan, kansas bydeveloping and maintaining initiatives in private fundraising,…

Philanthropy
10
The Research Foundation

The research foundation invests in health-centered programs and partnerships that benefit health care students and professionals, patients, and people in the kansas city community.

Health
11
Jefferson Regional Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to improve the health and well-being of the communities served by jefferson hospital through engagement, community-driven research and grantmaking. there are three grantmaking priorities focused on the…

Health
12
Kansas Bioscience Organization Inc

Biokansas is the unified voice representing the biosciences in kansas. across the human, plant, animal and industrial biosciences, biokansas is focused on enhancing the business and research climate and working with leaders across the…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Great Plains and the most unlike its peers is Volland Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFamily Philanthropic Founda…Reproductive Health ServicesPerforming Arts Organizatio…Child & Family Crisis Servi…Pet Rescue and Adoption Ser…Higher Education Support Fo…Crisis Support & Shelter Se…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr12%6%5–10yr16%17%10–20yr15%34%20–35yr16%20%35–55yr24%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%2%5–10yr16%4%10–20yr15%31%20–35yr16%34%35–55yr24%30%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/38
the rest of the field
12%
4,544/39,453

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
23/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATURE CONSERVANCY KS CHAPTER — $446,000 · OtherNATURE CONSERVANCY KS CHAPTERSALVATION ARMY — $128,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYROSE BROOKS CENTER INC — $78,000 · OtherROSE BROOKS CENTER INCKCUR — $72,000 · OtherKCURKCPT — $45,000 · OtherKANSAS LAND TRUST INC — $49,000 · OtherOPERATION WILDLIFE INC — $44,000 · Other+29 more — $371,950 · Other+29 moreMAYO CLINIC — $180,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS — $135,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTH…UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $15,000 · HealthTrust Women Foundation Inc — $15,000 · Health+2 more — $3,000 · HealthHope Faith Ministries Inc — $219,236 · Human ServicesHope Faith Mi…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $30,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nati…CORNERSTONES OF CARE — $27,500 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONES …FAITH LOVE HOPE WIN FOUNDATION INC — $16,000 · Human ServicesFAITH LOVE HO…THE NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION — $125,000 · Arts & CultureTHE NELSON G…KAUFFMAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $105,000 · Arts & CultureKAUFFMAN CEN…ARTS & RECREATION FOUNDATION OF OVERLAND — $48,850 · Arts & CultureARTS & RECRE…+1 more — $1,000 · Arts & CultureHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK — $144,500 · Food & NutritionMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $81,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $51,000 · InternationalHEALTH OUTREACH FOUNDATION — $5,000 · InternationalOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC — $25,000 · EducationKANSAS CITY GIRLS PREPARATORY ACADEMY — $20,000 · EducationSIGMA NU EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · EducationUMKC FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Education
Other$1,233,950Health$348,000Human Services$292,736Arts & Culture$279,850Food & Nutrition$144,500International$137,000Education$55,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHope Faith Ministries Inc — $219,236 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $180,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK — $144,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS — $135,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION — $125,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetKAUFFMAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $105,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $81,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetROSE BROOKS CENTER INC — $78,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $51,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS LAND TRUST INC — $49,000 over 9y, 4.9% of budgetARTS & RECREATION FOUNDATION OF OVERLAND — $48,850 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetOPERATION WILDLIFE INC — $44,000 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY LINC — $33,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONES OF CARE — $27,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKANSAS CITY GIRLS PREPARATORY ACADEMY — $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFAITH LOVE HOPE WIN FOUNDATION INC — $16,000 over 8y, 89% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTrust Women Foundation Inc — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetISLAND HOUSING TRUST CORPORATION — $13,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Health Care Inc — $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNAIA CHAMPIONS OF CHARACTER FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetSIGMA NU EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDEEP ROOTS KC INC — $5,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetVOLLAND FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetUMKC FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SUDC FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSeton Center Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WWI MUSEUM AND MEMORIAL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Hope Faith Ministries Inc
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC
  • Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT PLAINS
  • Who funds THE NELSON GALLERY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds KAUFFMAN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds ROSE BROOKS CENTER INC
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC
  • Who funds KANSAS LAND TRUST INC
  • Who funds ARTS & RECREATION FOUNDATION OF OVERLAND
  • Who funds OPERATION WILDLIFE INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY LINC
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds CORNERSTONES OF CARE
  • Who funds OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC
  • Who funds KANSAS CITY GIRLS PREPARATORY ACADEMY
  • Who funds FAITH LOVE HOPE WIN FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER RESEARCH INSTITUTE
  • Who funds Trust Women Foundation Inc
  • Who funds ISLAND HOUSING TRUST CORPORATION
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
  • Who funds Family Health Care Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO33× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · G Kenneth and Ann Baum Philanthropic Fund · Marion and Henry Bloch Family Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · The Atterbury Family Foundation · Constance M Cooper Charitable Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · The Francis Family Foundation · William T Kemper Foundation Commerce Bank Trustee · Health Forward Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · The Sunderland Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Stueck Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Island Housing Trust Corporation1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph