Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Stollman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$39kFood & Nutrition$30kEducation$16kPhilanthropy$15kEnvironment$7kReligion$6kAnimals$5kHuman Services$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$171k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YAD EZRA$6,000
CHAMBER SOLOISTS OF DETROIT$3,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF METRO DETROIT$3,000
DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HELPLINE HOUSE: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$60k · 3 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
15

Total granted

$60k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+20%

Still filing today

67%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsEnvironmentHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YE
    YAD EZRA
    4× · 2021–2025 · $30k · revenue -16%
  • CS
    CHAMBER SOLOISTS OF DETROIT
    4× · 2021–2025 · $15k
  • DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $15k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • RS
    RAMAZ SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
  • CC
    CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • AE
    ACTORS ENSEMBLE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bainbridge Island Museum of Art

Bainbridge island museum of art (bima) inspires curiosity, wonder and understanding by connecting people with the contemporary art and craft of the puget sound region.

Arts & Culture
2
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
3
Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust

The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.

Arts & Culture
4
The Jewish Studio Project

Through thought leadership, community programs, leadership development, and organizational partnerships, jsp is building a movement to activate the creative power of the jewish community.

Religion
5
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
6
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
7
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
8
Seattle Art Museum

Founded in 1917, the seattle art museum (sam) connects art to life. as the leading visual art institution in the pacific northwest, sam draws on its global collections, powerful special exhibitions, numerous installations, and dynamic…

Arts & Culture
9
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
10
Oregon Jewish Museum and Center for Holocaust Education

The oregon jewish museum and center for holocaust education explores the legacy of the jewish experience in oregon, teaches the enduring and universal relevance of the holocaust, and provides opportunities for intercultural conversations.

Arts & Culture
11
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
12
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Detroit; the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YAD EZRA: $30,000 · OtherYAD EZRACHAMBER SOLOISTS OF DETROIT: $15,000 · OtherCHAMBER SOLOISTS OF DETROITRAMAZ SCHOOL: $11,000 · OtherRAMAZ SCHOOLCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY: $5,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN COMMUNITYACTORS ENSEMBLE INC: $5,000 · OtherACTORS ENSEMBLE INCSTEINERBOOKS: $5,000 · OtherSTEINERBOOKS+3 more: $5,500 · Other+3 moreDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureDETROIT SYMPHONY…METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $1,500 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUS…THE JEWISH MUSEUM: $750 · Arts & CultureJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $15,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERAT…BAINBRIDGE ISLAND LAND TRUST: $5,000 · EnvironmentPROGRESSIVE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY: $2,000 · AnimalsWest Sound Wildlife Shelter: $2,000 · AnimalsKITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 · AnimalsHELPLINE HOUSE: $1,000 · Human ServicesYIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC: $500 · Religion
Other$76,500Arts & Culture$17,250Philanthropy$15,000Environment$5,000Animals$5,000Human Services$1,000Religion$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYAD EZRA: $30,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBAINBRIDGE ISLAND LAND TRUST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROGRESSIVE ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWest Sound Wildlife Shelter: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BLOEDEL RESERVE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPLINE HOUSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYIVO INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH RESEARCH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

One Call for AllWA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: One Call for All · Bainbridge Community Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Margolis Foundation · Rotary Club of Bainbridge Island Trust · Kitsap Community Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stollman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stollman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Stollman Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Stollman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stollman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph