Skip to content
The Stoebner Family Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Stoebner Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Animals$925kHealth$325kPhilanthropy$154kHuman Services$136kEducation$30kEnvironment$25kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$50,000
LE JARDIN ACADEMY$10,000
FAMILY LIFE CENTER INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FAMILY LIFE CENTER INC: $10k → 9%MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION: $20k → 9%ST JUDE'S: $50k → 17%HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%J WALTER CAMERON CENTER: $20k → 9%SALVATION ARMY OAHU: $50k → 9%J WALTER CAMERON CENTER: $20k → 9%MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION: $10k → 9%J WALTER CAMERON CENTER: $10k → 9%LE JARDIN ACADEMY: $10k → 9%J WALTER CAMERON CENTER: $1k → 9%ALOHA UNITED WAY: $100k → 9%ALOHA UNITED WAY: $50k → 9%CAROLE KAI CHARITIES INC: $4k → 9%SALVATION ARMY: $5k → 9%HAWAIIAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $450k → 9%HAWAIIAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $150k → 9%HAWAIIAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $125k → 9%HAWAIIAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $125k → 9%SHRINERS HOSPITALS HONOLULU: $100k → 9%SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $50k → 9%SHRINERS CHILDREN'S HAWAII: $50k → 9%HAWAIIAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $15k → 9%HAWAIIAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $10k → 9%HAWAIIAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $10k → 9%HAWAIIAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $10k → 9%HAWAIIAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 9%SPECIAL OLYMPICS HAWAII: $10k → 9%CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICE: $20k → 9%SAVING HAWAII'S FORESTS: $25k → 9%ASSETS SCHOOL: $10k → 9%ASSETS SCHOOL: $10k → 9%ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION: $10k → 9%QUEENS MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 5 repeat orgs$504k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
14

Total granted

$1.2M
$434k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+34%

Still filing today

80%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyHealthAnimalsEnvironmentEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HAWAIIAN HUMANE SOCIETY
    4× · 2020–2023 · $900k · revenue +66%
  • AU
    ALOHA UNITED WAY INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $150k · revenue +10%
  • JW
    J WALTER CAMERON CENTER
    3× · 2021–2023 · $51k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • SH
    SHRINERS HOSPITALS HONOLULU
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • SH
    SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Hawaii Foundation

To unite donors' passions with the university of hawai'i's (uh) aspirations by raising philanthropic support and managing investments to benefit uh, the people of hawai'i and our future generations.

Education
2
Hawaii - American Nurses Association Foundation
Environment
3
Ho'ola Lahui Hawaii

To improve the health and well-being of our community.

Human Services
4
Pali Momi Foundation

The mission of pali momi foundation is to create a healthier hawai'i.

Health
5
Kapi'olani Health Foundation

The mission of kapi'olani health foundation is to create a healthier hawai'i.

Health
6
Hui Pohala

Palliative care is a win-win-win-win. expanding access to palliative care benefits all parts of the healthcare system. people living with serious illness are better able to manage physical and emotional symptoms and have peace of mind that…

Health
7
Kapi'olani Medical Specialists

Kapi'olani medical specialists (dba hawai'i pacific health medical group) is a multispecialty provider group dedicated to providing world-class care for adults and children across hawai'i and the pacific region working in partnership with…

Health
8
Hawaii Maritime Center
—
9
Kaua'i Medical Clinic

Kaua'i medical clinic, an affliate of hawai'i pacific health, is a multi-specialty clinic dedicated to providing world-class care for adults and children across hawai'i and the pacific region in partnership with kapi'olani medical center…

Health
10
Kuakini Foundation

The mission of kuakini foundation is to improve the health status of the community by: providing comprehensive health care services and programs at reasonable cost; continuously improving the quality of health care services and programs;…

—
11
Waikiki Health

To provide high quality medical and social services that are affordable and accessible for everyone regardless of ability to pay.

Health
12
Hawaii Cancer Consortium

To conduct and encourage high quality medical, surgical, and scientific research and research related training in cancer treatment, diagnosis, and care and to compile and disseminate information derived from such research and research…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child and Family Service; the most unlike its peers is Saving Hawaiis Forests Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
14/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HAWAIIAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $900,000 · AnimalsHAWAIIAN HUMANE SOCIETY+1 more: $25,000 · AnimalsSHRINERS HOSPITALS HONOLULU: $100,000 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITALS HONOLUL…J WALTER CAMERON CENTER: $51,000 · OtherJ WALTER CAMERON CENTERSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $50,000 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHI…Individual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALVATION ARMY OAHU: $50,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OAHUMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION: $30,000 · OtherMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIA…CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICE: $20,000 · Other+4 more: $35,000 · Other+4 moreALOHA UNITED WAY INC: $150,000 · PhilanthropyALOHA UNITED …AMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING: $50,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN MACU…+1 more: $4,000 · PhilanthropyST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $50,000 · HealthHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthTHE QUEEN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 · HealthSAVING HAWAIIS FORESTS INC: $25,000 · EnvironmentASSETS SCHOOL: $20,000 · EducationSPECIAL OLYMPICS HAWAII INC: $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Animals$925,000Other$386,000Philanthropy$204,000Health$85,000Environment$25,000Education$20,000Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHAWAIIAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $900,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetALOHA UNITED WAY INC: $150,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetJ WALTER CAMERON CENTER: $51,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MACULAR DEGENERATION GOEHRING: $50,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetASSETS SCHOOL: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD AND FAMILY SERVICE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLE JARDIN ACADEMY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS HAWAII INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE QUEEN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Life Center Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAROLE KAI CHARITIES INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chung Kun Ai Foundati…Central Pacific Bank …The Harry and Jeanett…Laulima FoundationThe Clarence Tc Ching…First Insurance Compa…Tradewind Group Found…J Watumull FundBank of Hawaii Charit…Aloha United Way IncEnterprise Holdings F…Morgan Stanley Global…
Chung Kun Ai FoundationHI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chung Kun Ai Foundation · Central Pacific Bank Foundation · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Laulima Foundation · The Clarence Tc Ching Foundation · First Insurance Company of Hawaii Charitable Foundation · Tradewind Group Foundation · J Watumull Fund · Bank of Hawaii Charitable Fdn · Aloha United Way Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stoebner Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stoebner Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stoebner Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home