Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Stocker Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
208
Grants FY2025still arriving
16
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$5.0MPhilanthropy$2.6MHuman Services$1.6MArts & Culture$1.5MYouth Development$1.5MFood & Nutrition$1.1MInternational$254kHousing & Shelter$241kOther$0
02FY2025 · 208 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k127 grants · $307k
  • $10k–50k70 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $510k
  • $250k+2 grants · $850k
$5,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHERN ARIZONA$500,000
NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE$350,000
SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO$85,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST OHIO$75,000
LIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$50,000
MAKE WAY FOR BOOKS$50,000
SAVE OUR CHILDREN OF ELYRIA$50,000
GREAT LAKES MUSEUM OF SCIENCE ENVIRONMENT AND TECHNOLOGY$50,000
SAN FRANCISCO EDUCATION FUND$50,000
LITERACY CONNECTS$50,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH EAST OHIO$50,000
SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO$45,804
SAN JUAN ISLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT$43,525
JOYCE L SOBEL FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER$40,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%OPERATION WARM INC: $17k → 10%CAMPHILL VILLAGE COPAKE FOUNDATION INC: $18k → 11%OPERATION WARM: $17k → 10%CAMPHILL VILLAGE COPAKE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%CRUCES CREATIVES: $50k → 23%JOYCE L SOBEL FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $65k → 10%CAMPHILL VILLAGE COPAKE FOUNDATIONINC: $10k → 11%CRUCES CREATIVES: $40k → 23%GIRLS INC OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $50k → 10%CAMPHILL VILLAGE COPAKE FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 11%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $50k → 10%CAMPHILL VILLAGE COPAKE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%JOYCE L SOBEL FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $40k → 10%JOYCE L SOBEL FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $38k → 10%HOLY FAMILY DAY HOMES OF SAN FRANCISCO: $15k → 10%CRUCES CREATIVES: $18k → 23%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $30k → 10%HOLY FAMILY DAY HOMES OF SAN FRANCISCO: $15k → 10%VINE MAPLE PLACE: $25k → 9%HOLY FAMILY DAY HOMES OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%LORAIN COUNTY COMM ACTION AGENCY: $14k → 13%SHOES AND CLOTHES FOR KIDS INC: $10k → 17%FAMILY CONNECTIONS CENTERS: $20k → 10%FAMILY CONNECTIONS CENTERS: $15k → 10%MESILLA VALLEY COMMUNITY OF HOPE: $25k → 23%CASA DE PEREGRINOS: $18k → 23%GIFTS OF LOVE INC: $20k → 11%JARDIN DE LOS NIOS: $10k → 23%SEQUOIA LIVING: $15k → 10%PROJECT NIGHT NIGHT: $10k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 10%THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES & CHILDREN: $25k → 11%FAMILY CONNECTIONS OF NORTHEAST OHIO: $25k → 17%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $15k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 10%SEEDS OF LITERACY: $20k → 17%FAMILY CONNECTIONS OF NORTHEAST OHIO: $25k → 17%SHOES AND CLOTHES FOR KIDS INC: $16k → 17%SHOES & CLOTHES FOR KIDS: $15k → 17%LORAIN COUNTY URBAN LEAGUE INC: $50k → 13%LORAIN COUNTY URBAN LEAGUE INC: $38k → 13%BLESSING HOUSE: $27k → 13%BLESSING HOUSE: $26k → 13%BLESSING HOUSE: $16k → 13%BLESSING HOUSE: $13k → 13%EL CENTRO DE SERVICIOS SOCIALES INC: $43k → 13%EL CENTRO DE SERVICIOS SOCIALES INC: $35k → 13%EL CENTRO DE SERVICIOS SOCIALES: $30k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
MN
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
CO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
DC
HI
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of The Stocker Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 42% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 24%.

The Stocker Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 50% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 207 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

207 repeat relationships: 98 still active in FY2025, 109 since wound down; 54 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

207
172

Total granted

$12M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+13%

Still filing today

83%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $384k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $850k · revenue +26%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO
    4× · 2020–2025 · $321k · revenue +21%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST OHIO
    5× · 2020–2025 · $320k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • OB
    OBERLIN BOARD OF EDUCATION
    one grant, 2021 · $80k
  • LC
    LORAIN COUNTY IMAGINATION LIBRARY
    one grant, 2020 · $75k
  • TC
    THE CLEVELAND PLAY HOUSE
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
2
Springboard Collaborative

Springboard collaborative combines targeted student instruction with parent training in an incentivized system that closes the literacy gap, by transferring the summer from a barrier into a springboard for financially disadvantaged…

Human Services
3
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
4
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

—
5
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
6
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
7
Child Welfare League of America

Child welfare league of america engages its network of public and private agencies and partners to advance policies, best practices, and collaborative strategies that result in better outcomes for vulnerable children, youth, and families.

Human Services
8
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
9
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
10
Children's Museum of Oak Park

To spark curiosity and creativity in all young children through positive, play-based learning experiences.

Arts & Culture
11
The Center for Early Education

The center for early education, a socio-economically and culturally diverse independent school for children, toddlers through grade six, strives to graduate students who are joyful, resilient, lifelong learners. the center embraces a…

Education
12
Achieve Now

Achieve now is a philadelphia-based social justice organization that sees literacy as a mechanism to effect social change. our mission is to provide k-2 school children in greater philadelphia with high-quality, culturally competent…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Connections of Northeast Ohio; the most unlike its peers is Wee Care Closet. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

337 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 337 of the 449 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
80
Early backer (in before they grew)
329/337
Grantees still filing
215/337
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ELYRIA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $1,007,700 · OtherELYRIA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICTLORAIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $292,200 · OtherLORAIN HISTORICAL SOCIETYSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NC OH: $212,225 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO: $321,404 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NORTH CENT…SAVE OUR CHILDREN OF ELYRIA: $292,818 · OtherSAVE OUR CHILDREN OF ELYRIA+74 more: $3,258,367 · Other+74 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $2,063,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LORAIN COUNTY: $294,937 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF …LAS CRUCES PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $192,503 · PhilanthropyLAS CRUCES PUBLIC SCHOOL…CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $183,700 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION…United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc: $126,686 · Philanthropy+10 more: $569,632 · Philanthropy+10 moreLITERACY CONNECTS: $224,077 · EducationLITERACY CONNECTSTECH CORPS OHIO: $177,500 · EducationTECH CORPS OHIOLORAIN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $163,772 · EducationLORAIN COUNTY COMMU…San Francisco Education Fund: $140,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S READING ALLIANCE: $137,000 · EducationLIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $134,253 · EducationMake Way For Books: $130,000 · EducationTeam Read: $122,044 · EducationNew Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc: $95,406 · Education+36 more: $1,485,195 · Education+36 moreBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST OHIO: $320,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND …FOOTPATH FOUNDATION: $174,203 · Youth DevelopmentFOOTPATH …OPEN DOORS INC: $112,500 · Youth DevelopmentOPEN DOOR…BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CONNECTICUT INC: $94,649 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTH…GEEKING OUT KIDS OF COLOR: $81,100 · Youth DevelopmentGEEKING O…CASA DE LOS NINOS: $81,000 · Youth DevelopmentCASA DE L…EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $80,000 · Youth DevelopmentEFFECTIVE…Bridge the Gap College Prep: $65,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH EAST OHIO: $61,000 · Youth DevelopmentBristol Boys & Girls Club Association Inc: $55,360 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $55,000 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTHERSBIG SISTERS OF LORAIN COUNTY: $53,070 · Youth DevelopmentIDEASTREAM: $49,633 · Youth Development+4 more: $105,350 · Youth Development+4 moreJOYCE L SOBEL FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $154,549 · Human ServicesGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $130,000 · Human ServicesEL CENTRO DE SERVICIOS SOCIALES INC: $112,774 · Human ServicesCRUCES CREATIVES: $108,919 · Human ServicesBLESSING HOUSE: $91,857 · Human ServicesLORAIN COUNTY URBAN LEAGUE INC: $89,084 · Human ServicesCAMPHILL VILLAGE COPAKE FOUNDATION INC: $71,519 · Human ServicesSEEDS OF LITERACY: $53,958 · Human ServicesFAMILY CONNECTIONS OF NORTHEAST OHIO: $50,000 · Human ServicesOperation Warm Inc: $48,500 · Human ServicesSHOES AND CLOTHES FOR KIDS: $46,300 · Human Services+8 more: $275,373 · Human ServicesTUCSON FESTIVAL OF BOOKS: $210,000 · Arts & CultureACT ONE: $105,000 · Arts & CultureFOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATION: $97,500 · Arts & CultureHUMANITIES WASHINGTON: $85,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CLEVELAND PLAY HOUSE: $75,000 · Arts & CultureCONNECTICUT STORYTELLING CENTER INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureGREAT LAKES THEATER FESTIVAL INC: $38,900 · Arts & Culture+16 more: $358,087 · Arts & CultureNEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE: $850,449 · Recreation & SportsBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF KING COUNTY: $47,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$5,384,714Philanthropy$3,430,958Education$2,809,247Youth Development$1,387,865Human Services$1,232,833Arts & Culture$1,019,487Recreation & Sports$897,949

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $2,063,500 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE: $850,449 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO: $321,404 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST OHIO: $320,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LORAIN COUNTY: $294,937 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetSAVE OUR CHILDREN OF ELYRIA: $292,818 over 6y, 14% of budgetLORAIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $292,200 over 6y, 13% of budgetLITERACY CONNECTS: $224,077 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetTUCSON FESTIVAL OF BOOKS: $210,000 over 6y, 9.9% of budgetLAS CRUCES PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $192,503 over 5y, 28% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $183,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTECH CORPS OHIO: $177,500 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetFOOTPATH FOUNDATION: $174,203 over 2y, 29% of budgetLORAIN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $163,772 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetJOYCE L SOBEL FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $154,549 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $152,445 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSan Francisco Education Fund: $140,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S READING ALLIANCE: $137,000 over 4y, 44% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $134,253 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMake Way For Books: $130,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $130,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetUnited Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc: $126,686 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTeam Read: $122,044 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetEL CENTRO DE SERVICIOS SOCIALES INC: $112,774 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetOPEN DOORS INC: $112,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCRUCES CREATIVES: $108,919 over 3y, 14% of budgetACT ONE: $105,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC: $102,236 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPHILANTHROPY OHIO: $101,509 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetFOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATION: $97,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetNew Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc: $95,406 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CONNECTICUT INC: $94,649 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetBLESSING HOUSE: $91,857 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER LORAIN COUNTY INC: $90,250 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetTHE LITERACY COOPERATIVE OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $90,006 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetWorld Savvy: $89,525 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetLORAIN COUNTY URBAN LEAGUE INC: $89,084 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $85,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANITIES WASHINGTON: $85,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetSPARK SF PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $83,414 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $81,546 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGEEKING OUT KIDS OF COLOR: $81,100 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetCASA DE LOS NINOS: $81,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $80,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetKENDAL NORTHERN OHIO: $80,000 over 5y, 9.0% of budgetFRIDAY HARBOR FOOD BANK: $77,130 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc: $76,576 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMAIN STREET COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $76,346 over 6y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHERN ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST OHIO ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LORAIN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SAVE OUR CHILDREN OF ELYRIA ↗
  • Who funds LORAIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY CONNECTS ↗
  • Who funds TUCSON FESTIVAL OF BOOKS ↗
  • Who funds LAS CRUCES PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds TECH CORPS OHIO ↗
  • Who funds FOOTPATH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LORAIN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOYCE L SOBEL FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds San Francisco Education Fund ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S READING ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds Make Way For Books ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc ↗
  • Who funds Team Read ↗
  • Who funds EL CENTRO DE SERVICIOS SOCIALES INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOORS INC ↗
  • Who funds CRUCES CREATIVES ↗
  • Who funds ACT ONE ↗
  • Who funds ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILANTHROPY OHIO ↗
  • Who funds FOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds New Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds BLESSING HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER LORAIN COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

The Nord Family FoundationOH80.4× affinity43 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Nord Family Foundation · Community Foundation of Lorain County · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · Martha Holden Jennings Foundation · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · The Abington Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · Norton Family Foundation · Marshall Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stocker Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stocker Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • The Village for Families and Children: 50% of income from government
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of Connecticut Inc: 15% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Hill-Stead Museum: 7% of income from government
  • Girls Inc of the Pacific Northwest: 4% of income from government
  • New England Carousel Museum Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Bristol Boys & Girls Club Association Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Connecticut Storytelling Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Healing Meals Foundation Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • The Family Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
92report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Stocker Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Stocker Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 449 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stocker’s filings →

More from the funding graph