· Private foundation
The Stocker Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k127 grants · $307k
- $10k–50k70 grants · $1.3M
- $50k–250k9 grants · $510k
- $250k+2 grants · $850k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHERN ARIZONA | $500,000 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE | $350,000 |
| SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO | $85,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST OHIO | $75,000 |
| LIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $50,000 |
| MAKE WAY FOR BOOKS | $50,000 |
| SAVE OUR CHILDREN OF ELYRIA | $50,000 |
| GREAT LAKES MUSEUM OF SCIENCE ENVIRONMENT AND TECHNOLOGY | $50,000 |
| SAN FRANCISCO EDUCATION FUND | $50,000 |
| LITERACY CONNECTS | $50,000 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH EAST OHIO | $50,000 |
| SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO | $45,804 |
| SAN JUAN ISLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT | $43,525 |
| JOYCE L SOBEL FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER | $40,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 15% of The Stocker Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 42% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 24%.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.
207 repeat relationships: 98 still active in FY2025, 109 since wound down; 54 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $384k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- NANEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE6× · 2020–2025 · $850k · revenue +26%
- SHSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO4× · 2020–2025 · $321k · revenue +21%
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST OHIO5× · 2020–2025 · $320k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- OBOBERLIN BOARD OF EDUCATIONone grant, 2021 · $80k
- LCLORAIN COUNTY IMAGINATION LIBRARYone grant, 2020 · $75k
- TCTHE CLEVELAND PLAY HOUSEone grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +11%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.
Springboard collaborative combines targeted student instruction with parent training in an incentivized system that closes the literacy gap, by transferring the summer from a barrier into a springboard for financially disadvantaged…
To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.
We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.
The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.
The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…
Child welfare league of america engages its network of public and private agencies and partners to advance policies, best practices, and collaborative strategies that result in better outcomes for vulnerable children, youth, and families.
The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…
The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…
To spark curiosity and creativity in all young children through positive, play-based learning experiences.
The center for early education, a socio-economically and culturally diverse independent school for children, toddlers through grade six, strives to graduate students who are joyful, resilient, lifelong learners. the center embraces a…
Achieve now is a philadelphia-based social justice organization that sees literacy as a mechanism to effect social change. our mission is to provide k-2 school children in greater philadelphia with high-quality, culturally competent…
How this is measured
337 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 337 of the 449 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHERN ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST OHIO ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LORAIN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SAVE OUR CHILDREN OF ELYRIA ↗
- Who funds LORAIN HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds LITERACY CONNECTS ↗
- Who funds TUCSON FESTIVAL OF BOOKS ↗
- Who funds LAS CRUCES PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
- Who funds TECH CORPS OHIO ↗
- Who funds FOOTPATH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LORAIN COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JOYCE L SOBEL FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds San Francisco Education Fund ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S READING ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds Make Way For Books ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc ↗
- Who funds Team Read ↗
- Who funds EL CENTRO DE SERVICIOS SOCIALES INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN DOORS INC ↗
- Who funds CRUCES CREATIVES ↗
- Who funds ACT ONE ↗
- Who funds ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds PHILANTHROPY OHIO ↗
- Who funds FOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds New Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CONNECTICUT INC ↗
- Who funds BLESSING HOUSE ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER LORAIN COUNTY INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: The Nord Family Foundation · Community Foundation of Lorain County · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · Martha Holden Jennings Foundation · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · The Abington Foundation · The Cleveland Foundation · Norton Family Foundation · Marshall Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Stocker Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stocker Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- The Village for Families and Children: 50% of income from government
- Big Brothers Big Sisters of Connecticut Inc: 15% of income from government
- City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
- Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
- Hill-Stead Museum: 7% of income from government
- Girls Inc of the Pacific Northwest: 4% of income from government
- New England Carousel Museum Inc: 2% of income from government
- Bristol Boys & Girls Club Association Inc: 2% of income from government
- Connecticut Storytelling Center Inc: 2% of income from government
- Healing Meals Foundation Corporation: 0% of income from government
- The Family Center Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Stocker Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Stocker Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Stocker’s filings →