Skip to content

· Public charity

The Steve Smith Family Foundation

The Steve Smith Foundation focuses on the mental health and wellness of families and underserved communities.

$6k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Human Services$256kPhilanthropy$35kEducation$17kHousing & Shelter$13kRecreation & Sports$5kFood & Nutrition$3kArts & Culture$3kHealth$3kOther$0
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Charlotte Hornets Foundation$5,000
Vanguard Charitable$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $257k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Whaley Childrens Center: $2k → 16%Charlotte Family Housing: $5k → 10%House of Ruth Maryland: $5k → 19%Charlotte Family Housing: $5k → 10%NC Med Assist: $600 → 10%NC Med Assist: $400 → 10%Project 658: $97k → 10%Project 658: $70k → 10%Project 658: $46k → 10%Project 658: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
RI
MO
MD
NC
SC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$301k · 8 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +99% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
31

Total granted

$301k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
+12%

Still filing today

88%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • P6
    Project 658 Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $239k · revenue +123%
  • CH
    CHARLOTTE HORNETS FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $29k · revenue +65%
  • CF
    Charlotte Family Housing
    2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
  • TH
    THE HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +26%
  • EI
    EVERFI INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Mankind

Rehabilitation, Recovery, Restoration & Resilience for individuals, families, & communities impacted by domestic violence.

Crime & Legal
2
UrbanPromise Charlotte

Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.

Youth Development
3
Durham Home Inc
—
4
Heal Charlotte

Heal Charlotte is a community based organization that provides youth development programming (in-school, after school, and summer camps), adult training workshops (financial literacy, job training), rental assistance and eviction…

Human Services
5
Ruths House

Provide a community owned and operated shelter for a safe haven from domestic violence for women and their children in beaufort county, nc. provide counseling and guidance to allow these women to make decisions about their future.

Crime & Legal
6
Refugee Hope Partners Inc

To engage, equip, and encourage our refugee neighbors so that all may thrive.

Human Services
7
Rebuilding Together of Greater Charlotte

The mission of Rebuilding Together of Greater Charlotte is repairing homes, revitalizing communities, rebuilding lives.We mobilize community volunteers and contractors to provide repairs that make homes safer and healthier for…

Housing & Shelter
8
Nami - Charlotte Pka Alliance for the Mentally Ill

Guided by the experiences of those living with mental health conditions and rooted in equity, NAMI Charlotte provides advocacy, education, support and connections to resources so that all individuals and families affected by mental illness…

—
9
North Carolina Empowerment Organization
Civil Rights
10
Cabarrus Cooperative Christian Ministry

To respond to the growing need in our community by providing immediate assistance to residents of Concord, Kannapolis, and Cabarrus County, NC who are experiencing crisis in the areas of food, shelter or finances while providing them…

—
11
Hubbard House Inc

Safety, empowerment, and social change for victims of domestic violence and their families. to that end we offer a full compendium of services for victims of domestic violence.

Human Services
12
Hearts for the Invisible Charlotte Coalition

Eradicating housing inequities for people experiencing homelessness

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope; the most unlike its peers is Dahlia Grove. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Project 658 Inc: $238,957 · Human ServicesProject 658 IncCharlotte Family Housing: $10,000 · Human Services+4 more: $9,040 · Human ServicesTurning Point Academy: $15,625 · OtherTurning Point AcademyIndividual grant recipient: $10,843 · OtherIndividual grant reci…EVERFI INC: $5,000 · OtherEVERFI INCDomestic Violence Shelter: $4,000 · OtherDomestic Violence She…Individual grant recipient: $3,082 · OtherUnited Way: $2,854 · OtherWomens Ntl football Conf: $2,500 · OtherEVERETTE BROWN BAG FOUNDATION: $2,500 · OtherFamily Crisis Council: $2,500 · Other+19 more: $22,023 · Other+19 moreCHARLOTTE HORNETS FOUNDATION INC: $28,500 · PhilanthropyCHARLOTTE…VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $1,000 · PhilanthropyThe Arts Empowerment Project Inc: $3,000 · Arts & CultureSHELTER CARE MINISTRIES: $3,000 · Housing & ShelterDream On 3: $1,500 · HealthEUSTRESS: $500 · HealthDahlia Grove: $1,500 · Employment
Human Services$257,997Other$70,927Philanthropy$29,500Arts & Culture$3,000Housing & Shelter$3,000Health$2,000Employment$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetProject 658 Inc: $238,957 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetCHARLOTTE HORNETS FOUNDATION INC: $28,500 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetCharlotte Family Housing: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHELTER CARE MINISTRIES: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWhaley Children's Center Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDream On 3: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMuggsy Bogues Family Foundation: $1,040 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCONVOY OF HOPE: $1,023 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMedAssist of Mecklenburg DBA NC Medassist: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUrban League of Central Carolinas Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget100 Black Men of Charlotte Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJamie Kimble Foundation for Courage: $520 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Project 658 Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHARLOTTE HORNETS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Charlotte Family Housing ↗
  • Who funds THE HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds The Arts Empowerment Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHELTER CARE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds Whaley Children's Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds ADOPT A BLOCK INC ↗
  • Who funds Dream On 3 ↗
  • Who funds Dahlia Grove ↗
  • Who funds Muggsy Bogues Family Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds MedAssist of Mecklenburg DBA NC Medassist ↗
  • Who funds Urban League of Central Carolinas Inc ↗
  • Who funds 100 Black Men of Charlotte Inc ↗
  • Who funds Jamie Kimble Foundation for Courage ↗
  • Who funds EUSTRESS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC27.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · The Presbyterian Hospital · United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · Albemarle Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Steve Smith Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Steve Smith Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • The House of Ruth Maryland Inc: 19% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Steve Smith Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Steve Smith Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Steve Smith Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph