Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Stephen R Caplan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$47k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$26kEducation$22kHousing & Shelter$10kArts & Culture$7kYouth Development$6kFood & Nutrition$5kPhilanthropy$5kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$527k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUDEO-CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CTR$10,000
EVMS FOUNDATION$10,000
UNITED WAY OF S HAMPTON ROADS$5,000
FOOD BANK OF SE VIRGINIA$5,000
JEWISH CULTURAL HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
HOSPICE HOUSE OF HAMPTON ROADS$5,000
JEWISH MUSEUM & CULTURAL CENTER$3,500
EVMS$2,500
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$1,000
VA BCH RESCUE SQUAD FOUNDATION$100
BETH EL THE BEACHES SYNAGOGUE$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BONEI OLAM: $2k → 20%HOSPICE HOUSE OF HAMPTON ROADS: $5k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$22k · 3 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
11

Total granted

$22k
$17k

Still filing today

0%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EV
    EASTERN VA MEDICAL SCHOOL
    2× · 2020–2021 · $11k
  • FC
    FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF MIAMI BEACH
    3× · 2020–2022 · $6k
  • E
    EVMS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $5k

Funded once

  • NC
    NORFOLK COLLEGIATE
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • JC
    JEWISH CULTURAL CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • S
    SURF
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of Jewish Hospitals and Education Centers of Brazil Inc
Philanthropy
2
Rva Hospice Llc

Kirva Hospice is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing excellence in care to our patients, families, and care givers in the greater Richmond area. Kirva Hospice is built on the philosophy of care that is deeply rooted in the…

Human Services
3
Bonei Olam Division of Williamsburg Inc

Bonei Olam provides financial assistance,guidance & referrals for assisted reproductive technology,including consultations, work up, medications, high risk pregnancy,Preimplantation genetic diagnosis,pre & post…

International
4
Bonei Olam Division of Central Jersey Inc

Bonei Olam provides financial assistance,guidance & referrals for assisted reproductive technology,including consultations, work up, medications, high risk pregnancy,Preimplantation genetic diagnosis,pre & post…

International
5
Jewish Family Service

Mission: Inspired by their history and values, Jewish Family Service supports the needs of Jewish individuals and families, refugees and immigrants, and the broader community to achieve well-being, health, and stability. From food security…

Human Services
6
Hebrew Orphan Society
—
7
Jewish Family Service

Jewish Family Service is a nonprofit social service organization that supports people of all faiths as they navigate through lifes's challenges - illness, aging , finanical uncertainty, mental health concerns, family problems, or personal…

—
8
Beth Sholom Home of Virginia

The mission of Beth Sholom Lifecare Community is to provide quality and comprehensive residential, healthcare and community-based services to individuals of all faiths, in a manner that reflects our Jewish traditions and values.

Health
9
American Friends of Herzog Hospital Inc

The organization was formed to provide financial support to fund services, capital projects, clinical research, and purchase of new equipment for herzog hospital in jerusalem, which is the 3rd largest hospital in jerusalem and is israel's…

Health
10
The Vi and Milton Weinstein Hospice Inc

The Vi and Milton Weinstein Hospice reflects the traditional Jewish concern for the dignity and uniqueness of each human life. Our mission is to provide comfort and the highest quality of care to adults confronting life limiting illness by…

Human Services
11
American Friends of Hospice of the Upper Galilee

Provide in home care for terminally ill patients.

Philanthropy
12
Jewish Family Service of Greater Hartford Inc

The mission of Jewish Family Services of Greater Hartford is to enhance and strengthen the quality of life through the Jewish values of caring and compassion. JFS achieves its mission by helping individuals and families progress toward…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helphopelive Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Israel Defense Forces. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EASTERN VA MEDICAL SCHOOL: $10,500 · OtherEASTERN VA MEDICAL SCHOOLEVMS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherEVMS FOUNDATIONFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF MIAMI BEACH: $6,100 · OtherFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF MIAMI BEACHUNITED WAY OF S HAMPTON ROADS: $5,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF S HAMPTON ROADSEVMS: $5,000 · OtherEVMSNORFOLK COLLEGIATE: $5,000 · OtherNORFOLK COLLEGIATEJEWISH CULTURAL HIGH SCHOOL: $5,000 · OtherJEWISH CULTURAL HIGH SCHOOLJEWISH CULTURAL CENTER: $3,500 · OtherJEWISH CULTURAL CENTERJEWISH MUSEUM & CULTURAL CENTER: $3,500 · OtherJEWISH MUSEUM & CULTURAL CENTERSURF: $3,000 · Other+5 more: $1,330 · OtherJUDEO-CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTERINC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterJUDEO-CHRISTI…HOSPICE HOUSE OF HAMPTON ROADS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE H…Bonei Olam Inc: $1,800 · Human ServicesBonei Ola…Jewish Family Services Inc: $500 · Human ServicesJewish Fa…FOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA: $5,000 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ASSUTA ASHDOD HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropySTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $1,000 · InternationalHELPHOPELIVE INC: $500 · Health
Other$57,930Housing & Shelter$10,000Human Services$7,300Food & Nutrition$5,000Philanthropy$1,000Education$1,000International$1,000Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJUDEO-CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTERINC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ASSUTA ASHDOD HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Family Services Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHELPHOPELIVE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JUDEO-CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTERINC ↗
  • Who funds FOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE HOUSE OF HAMPTON ROADS INC ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ASSUTA ASHDOD HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Family Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds HELPHOPELIVE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stephen R Caplan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stephen R Caplan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Stephen R Caplan Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Stephen R Caplan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stephen R Caplan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph