Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Stephen JHendrickson FoundationInc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$994k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$705k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$4.0MArts & Culture$1.3MHuman Services$1.1MPublic Benefit$817kHealth$346kInternational$113kEmployment$72kYouth Development$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $91k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $199k
  • $250k+1 grant · $705k
$40,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA of Metro North$705,047
Trinity Church$148,849
Radio Workshop US Inc$50,000
Hadwen Park Congregational Church$40,500
Greenleaf Christian Church$25,000
Sherrill House Inc$15,000
Trinity Boston Connects$10,052
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%New Europe Vision: $25k → 10%Pine Street Inn: $11k → 16%El Sol Jupiter's Neighborhood Resource Center: $10k → 11%Hannah's Home of South Florida: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
CA
NC
OK
MS
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.6M · 16 repeat orgs$187k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
11

Total granted

$7.6M
$187k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
0%

Still filing today

44%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPublic BenefitHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    The Center for Investigative Reporting formrly Foundation for National Progress
    8× · 2017–2024 · $817k · revenue +67%
  • SH
    SHERRILL HOUSE INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $346k · revenue +39%
  • RW
    RADIO WORKSHOP US INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $260k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • FO
    FOCUS ON TANZANIAN COMMUNITIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +67%
  • EC
    EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD INC
    one grant, 2024 · $37k
  • NE
    New Europe Vision Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -75%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
The National Catholic Reporter Publishing Co

Ncr connects catholics to church, faith and the common good with independent news, analysis and spiritual reflection.

Religion
3
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
4
The Equal Rights Center

The erc is a civil rights organization that identifies and seeks to eliminate unlawful and unfair discrimination in housing, employment, and public accommodations in its home community of greater washington, d.c. and nationwide.

Housing & Shelter
5
The Conversation Us Inc

Expert knowledge for the public good

Education
6
Security Council Report Inc

See schedule osecurity council report was established to provide timely, accurate, and objective information and analysis on the activities of the united nations security council. this information and analysis is provided for the benefit…

Education
7
Npr International Operations Inc

Npr international operations, inc. ("nprio") supports the international newsgathering activities of national public radio, inc. through bureaus and offices established locally in foreign countries.

8
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

9
St Louis Jewish Light

The st. louis jewish light is a non-profit, independent news source whose mission is to inform, inspire, educate, and connect the st. louis jewish community.

10
Southern Coalition for Social Justice

Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…

Crime & Legal
11
Technology Review Inc

Technology review's mission is to bring about better informed and more conscious decisions about technology through authoritative, influential, and trustworthy journalism.

Arts & Culture
12
Population Connection

Overpopulation threatens the quality of life for people everywhere. population connection is the national grassroots population organization that educates young people and advocates progressive action to stabilize world population at a…

Social Science

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trinity Boston Connects Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bach in the City (formerly Bach Week Festival). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Trinity Church — $2,701,474 · OtherTrinity ChurchYMCA of Metro North — $2,049,201 · OtherYMCA of Metro NorthHadwen Park Congregational Church — $784,500 · OtherHadwen Park Congregational Church+12 more — $607,288 · Other+12 moreThe Center for Investigative Reporting formrly Foundation for National Progress — $817,229 · Public BenefitThe Center …RADIO WORKSHOP US INC — $260,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CHRISTIAN CENTURY — $80,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $16,000 · Arts & CultureSHERRILL HOUSE INC — $346,097 · HealthNew Europe Vision Inc — $25,000 · Human ServicesPINE STREET INN INC — $11,470 · Human ServicesEl Sol Jupiters Neighborhood Resource Center Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesHANNAH'S HOME OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesFOCUS ON TANZANIAN COMMUNITIES INC — $50,000 · InternationalTRINITY BOSTON CONNECTS INC — $40,052 · Youth Development
Other$6,142,463Public Benefit$817,229Arts & Culture$356,000Health$346,097Human Services$51,470International$50,000Youth Development$40,052

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Center for Investigative Reporting formrly Foundation for National Progress — $817,229 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetSHERRILL HOUSE INC — $346,097 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetRADIO WORKSHOP US INC — $260,000 over 7y, 7.2% of budgetTHE CHRISTIAN CENTURY — $80,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetFOCUS ON TANZANIAN COMMUNITIES INC — $50,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetTRINITY BOSTON CONNECTS INC — $40,052 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNew Europe Vision Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetGRACE HOUSE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $21,895 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC — $11,470 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEl Sol Jupiters Neighborhood Resource Center Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHANNAH'S HOME OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTreasure Coast Youth Symphony Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Center for Investigative Reporting formrly Foundation for National Progress
  • Who funds SHERRILL HOUSE INC
  • Who funds RADIO WORKSHOP US INC
  • Who funds THE CHRISTIAN CENTURY
  • Who funds FOCUS ON TANZANIAN COMMUNITIES INC
  • Who funds TRINITY BOSTON CONNECTS INC
  • Who funds New Europe Vision Inc
  • Who funds GRACE HOUSE INC
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC
  • Who funds BACH IN THE CITY (formerly Bach Week Festival)
  • Who funds El Sol Jupiters Neighborhood Resource Center Inc
  • Who funds HANNAH'S HOME OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds Treasure Coast Youth Symphony Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN6.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Stephen JHendrickson FoundationInc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 31%
  • Sherrill House Inc31% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Stephen JHendrickson FoundationInc?

Find your warmest path to The Stephen JHendrickson FoundationInc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph