Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Stein Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$191k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$775kHealth$297kHousing & Shelter$125kArts & Culture$122kInternational$105kPhilanthropy$101kEducation$59kSocial Science$33kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $73k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $118k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASA DE AMPARO$18,000
SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE$15,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$15,000
VISTA HILL FOUNDATION$15,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SD COUNTY$12,500
ANY BABY CAN OF AUSTIN INC$12,000
STAR HOUSE$10,000
NORTH COAST REPERTORY THEATRE$10,000
THE IMPACT MVMT FOUNDATION$10,000
HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN$8,000
HEAR FOR A PURPOSE FOUNDATION$8,000
KORDA INSTITUTE$8,000
EAST COUNTY TRANSITIONAL LIVING CT$6,000
VILLAGE PROJECT AFRICA INC$5,000
STAND WITH US SAN DIEGO$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $642k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE CENTER FOR HEALTHY FAMILIES: $3k → 15%THE CENTER FOR HEALTHY FAMILIES: $3k → 15%THE CENTER FOR HEALTHY FAMILIES: $3k → 15%THE CENTER FOR HEALTHY FAMILIES: $3k → 15%REEB AVENUE CENTER: $3k → 15%THE CENTER FOR HEALTHY FAMILIES: $3k → 15%REEB AVENUE CENTER: $3k → 15%REEB AVENUE CENTER: $3k → 15%REEB AVENUE CENTER: $3k → 15%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $8k → 10%THE CENTER FOR HEALTHY FAMILIES: $3k → 15%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 10%THE CENTER FOR HEALTHY FAMILIES: $3k → 15%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 10%REEB AVENUE CENTER: $3k → 15%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 10%REEB AVENUE CENTER: $3k → 15%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $4k → 10%REEB AVENUE CENTER: $3k → 15%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $4k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $4k → 10%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $4k → 10%SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE: $15k → 11%SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE: $12k → 11%SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE: $12k → 11%SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE: $12k → 11%SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE: $12k → 11%SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE: $10k → 11%SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE: $10k → 11%SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE: $10k → 11%SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE: $10k → 11%CASA DE AMPARO: $68k → 11%CASA DE AMPARO: $65k → 11%CASA DE AMPARO: $62k → 11%CASA DE AMPARO: $57k → 11%CASA DE AMPARO: $56k → 11%CASA DE AMPARO: $55k → 11%CASA DE AMPARO: $51k → 11%CASA DE AMPARO: $18k → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IN
OH
CA
UT
VA
TN
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 34 repeat orgs$107k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
7

Total granted

$1.6M
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
0%

Still filing today

68%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    Casa De Amparo
    8× · 2017–2025 · $432k · revenue +17%
  • VH
    VISTA HILL FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $105k · revenue +35%
  • VP
    VILLAGE PROJECT AFRICA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $105k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • S
    sta
    one grant, 2018 · $67k
  • UC
    URBAN CORPS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +17%
  • SC
    SDNETS CO T GOERGEN
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Diego Center for Children

Founded in 1887, the center is the oldest children's nonprofit in the region accredited by the joint commission for its excellence in quality of care. the center provides a continuum of therapeutic & educational services to youth &…

Human Services
2
Vista Del Mar Child and Family Services

To provide comprehensive, family-centered social, educational and behavioral health services that encourage children, adolescents and their families to lead self reliant, stable and productive lives.

Human Services
3
California Court Appointed Special Advocate Association

California casa was founded in 1987. its mission is to ensure that children and youth in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems have both a voice and the services they need to thrive. we achieve this by strengthening and empowering…

Civil Rights
4
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
5
La Casa de las Madres

La Casa de las Madres' mission is to respond to calls for help from DV victims, of all ages, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. We give survivors the tools to transform their lives. We seek to prevent future violence by educating the…

—
6
Children's Institute Inc

Cii transforms the lives of children exposed to adversity and poverty in los angeles. by providing early education, behavioral health and family strengthening services, cii reaches 30,000 children and families annually in communities where…

Human Services
7
San Diego Volunteer Lawyer Program Inc

The mission of san diego volunteer lawyer program, inc. is to provide equal access to the justice system by serving as a bridge between indigent and other disadvantaged people in san diego county and the volunteer lawyers who are willing…

Social Science
8
Rady Children's Hospital San Diego

To restore, sustain and enhance the health and developmental potential of children through excellence in care, education, research and advocacy.

Health
9
New Alternatives Inc

New alternatives, inc. is committed to providing abused and negelected youth with hope and opportunities through a comprehensive array of social, residential and mental health services that we provide in san diego and orange county.

—
10
Kidworks Community Development Corp

Kidworks inspires purpose in youth, fuels their growth, and catalyzes their impact in the community and the world.

Human Services
11
Hannahs Family Center

Hannahs Family Center envisions a world where strong families enable children to thrive and communities to prosper. Since 1993, we have helped San Diego families navigate significant adverse changes, trauma and loss. As experts in…

Education
12
The Child Center of Ny Inc

The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Resource Center; the most unlike its peers is Blanchard Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
19/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Casa De Amparo: $431,640 · Human ServicesCasa De AmparoSOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC: $103,000 · Human ServicesSOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INCHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $41,500 · Human ServicesHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INCCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $27,000 · Human Services+2 more: $39,000 · Human Services+2 moreJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $140,268 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICEJEWISH FEDERATION OF SD COUNTY: $92,500 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF SD COUNTYANY BABY CAN OF AUSTIN INC: $68,000 · OtherANY BABY CAN OF AUSTIN INCsta: $67,000 · OtherstaTHE ELIZABETH HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $38,500 · OtherTHE ELIZABETH HOSPICE FOUNDATIONKORDA INSTITUTE: $33,000 · OtherKORDA INSTITUTESTAND WITH US SAN DIEGO: $31,200 · OtherSTAND WITH US SAN DIEGO+19 more: $100,590 · Other+19 moreVISTA HILL FOUNDATION: $105,040 · HealthVISTA HILL…Deaf Community Services of San Diego Inc: $46,000 · HealthDeaf Commu…LUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION: $9,000 · HealthLUCKY DUCK…+1 more: $3,000 · HealthNORTH COAST REPERTORY THEATRE: $86,000 · Arts & CultureArms Wide Open Corporation: $32,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureVILLAGE PROJECT AFRICA INC: $104,500 · InternationalRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO: $65,000 · PhilanthropySTAR HOUSE: $10,000 · PhilanthropyThe Impact MVMT Foundation: $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyMIRACOSTA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $37,000 · EducationKORDA INSTITUTE FOR TEACHING: $22,000 · EducationPELOTONIA: $4,000 · Education
Human Services$642,140Other$571,058Health$163,040Arts & Culture$120,000International$104,500Philanthropy$86,000Education$63,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCasa De Amparo: $431,640 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetVISTA HILL FOUNDATION: $105,040 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetVILLAGE PROJECT AFRICA INC: $104,500 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetSOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC: $103,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetNORTH COAST REPERTORY THEATRE: $86,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetANY BABY CAN OF AUSTIN INC: $68,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO: $65,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDeaf Community Services of San Diego Inc: $46,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $41,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMIRACOSTA COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $37,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetArms Wide Open Corporation: $32,000 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $27,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetKORDA INSTITUTE FOR TEACHING: $22,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetREEB AVENUE CENTER: $19,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR HEALTHY FAMILIES: $19,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetEAST COUNTY TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER: $14,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMAMA'S KITCHEN: $13,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetThe Vision of Children: $10,550 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetSTAR HOUSE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS INCLUDED TOGETHER: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SPIRIT OF LIBERTY FOUNDATON: $5,600 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetURBAN CORPS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPELOTONIA: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMCRD MUSEUM HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPASSION 4 KIDS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLANCHARD INSTITUTE INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Casa De Amparo ↗
  • Who funds VISTA HILL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VILLAGE PROJECT AFRICA INC ↗
  • Who funds SOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH COAST REPERTORY THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds ANY BABY CAN OF AUSTIN INC ↗
  • Who funds RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds Deaf Community Services of San Diego Inc ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds MIRACOSTA COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Arms Wide Open Corporation ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds KORDA INSTITUTE FOR TEACHING ↗
  • Who funds REEB AVENUE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR HEALTHY FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds EAST COUNTY TRANSITIONAL LIVING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MAMA'S KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds The Vision of Children ↗
  • Who funds STAR HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds The Impact MVMT Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LUCKY DUCK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KIDS INCLUDED TOGETHER ↗
  • Who funds THE SPIRIT OF LIBERTY FOUNDATON ↗
  • Who funds URBAN CORPS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds PELOTONIA ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MCRD MUSEUM HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego FoundationCA29.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The Cushman Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The Country Friends · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Boys and Girls Aid Society of San Diego Ltd · Samuel I & John Henry Fox Foundation · Pratt Memorial Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stein Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stein Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Stein Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Stein Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stein Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph