Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Stefanski Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$267k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$1.4MEducation$1.0MHealth$525kFood & Nutrition$101kReligion$60kArts & Culture$29kInternational$17kPhilanthropy$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $108k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $140k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEIDELBERG UNIVERSITY$90,000
GILMOUR ACADEMY$50,000
RHONDAS KISS$25,000
MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER$25,000
AMENDORG$17,353
RED SNEAKERS FOR OAKLEY$15,000
OXBRIDGE ACADEMY$15,000
PRAGER UNIVERSITY$11,000
PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY$7,500
FRESH RX$5,000
ALEXS WAY$2,500
TOMMY DEROIA SUCCESS FDN$2,500
SOUTHAMPTON ASSOCIATION INC$1,000
SHAKER HEIGHTS FOP LODGE 23$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CONNORS HOPE: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
TN
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 18 repeat orgs$297k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
33

Total granted

$2.9M
$277k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+33%

Still filing today

56%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RK
    RHONDA'S KISS
    6× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +10%
  • CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $300k · revenue +50%
  • RS
    RED SNEAKERS FOR OAKLEY INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $76k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • CC
    CLEVELAND CLINIC FLORIDA A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • H
    HOPEWELL
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +17%
  • UH
    UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS
    one grant, 2021 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

2
Chapel Hill-Chauncy Hall School

We engage a diverse community of learners in a collaborative educational experience, preparing them for college success and a lifetime of meaningful engagement with the broader world.

3
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
4
Hockaday School

Believing in the limitless potential of girls, hockaday school develops resilient, confident women who are educated and inspired to lead lives of purpose and impact.

Education
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
Sage Hill School

We inspire in our students a love of knowledge and the ability to use that knowledge creatively, compassionately and courageously throughout their lives.sage hill school's commitment to academic excellence and our outstanding college…

Education
7
Saint Andrew's School of Boca Raton Inc

Saint andrew's school is an independent school founded in the episcopal tradition. our mission is to build a community of learners, provide excellence in education, and nurture each student in mind, body, and spirit.

Education
8
Trustees of Lawrence Academy At Groton Ma Corp

Lawrence academy recognizes you for who you are, inspires you to take responsibility for who you want to become, supports you as you learn, and empowers you to take action for the greater good.

Education
9
Hillbrook School

Hillbrook provides an extraordinary educational experience that fosters a love of learning in our students and helps them to develop the knowledge, skills and confidence to achieve their highest individual potential in school and in life.…

Education
10
The Storm King School

The storm king school, a global community, prepares students by inspiring them toward academic success and confidence in an inclusive and diverse learning environment that embraces character, balance, and trust.

Education
11
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trustees of the Lawrenceville School and the most unlike its peers is Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Health CentersIndependent K-8 SchoolsUrban Agriculture & Food Ac…Land Conservation Organizat…Fallen First Responder Supp…Cancer Support OrganizationsFaith-Based Senior LivingChristian Youth CampsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionCommunity Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%11%<5yr12%11%5–10yr21%14%10–20yr14%14%20–35yr16%5%35–55yr20%46%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%1%<5yr12%4%5–10yr21%52%10–20yr14%2%20–35yr16%10%35–55yr20%31%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/40
the rest of the field
11%
8,037/74,266

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
27/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RHONDA'S KISS — $1,405,000 · PhilanthropyRHONDA'S KISS+1 more — $1,000 · PhilanthropyCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $300,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONGILMOUR ACADEMY INC — $250,000 · OtherGILMOUR ACADEMY INCCLEVELAND CLINIC FLORIDA A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $50,000 · OtherCLEVELAND CLINIC FLORIDA A NON…THE GATHERING PLACE — $50,000 · OtherTHE GATHERING PLACEBIRCHWOOD SCHOOL — $40,000 · Other+22 more — $178,491 · Other+22 moreCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $300,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNI…Heidelberg University — $268,000 · EducationHeidelberg UniversityPALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY INC — $63,157 · EducationPALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY I…TRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL — $25,000 · Education+6 more — $33,500 · EducationRED SNEAKERS FOR OAKLEY INC — $75,750 · HealthMAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER — $75,000 · HealthHOPEWELL — $25,000 · HealthGLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE INC — $15,000 · Health+8 more — $21,950 · HealthFRESH RX INC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionAMEND ORG — $17,353 · InternationalIAMA THEATRE COMPANY — $7,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE EAST END I — $1,500 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$1,406,000Other$868,491Education$689,657Health$212,700Food & Nutrition$20,000International$17,353Arts & Culture$8,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRHONDA'S KISS — $1,405,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHeidelberg University — $268,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRED SNEAKERS FOR OAKLEY INC — $75,750 over 6y, 8.4% of budgetMAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER — $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY INC — $63,157 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHOPEWELL — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH RX INC — $20,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetAMEND ORG — $17,353 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST GEORGE'S SCHOOL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY SCHOOL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIAMA THEATRE COMPANY — $7,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $6,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE AGAWAM CONSERVANCY INC — $5,300 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetHOLLYWOOD FOOD COALITION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPHASE ONE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAlexs Way — $5,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetTOMMY DEROIA SUCCESS FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetMISS HALL'S SCHOOL INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHAMPTON ASSOCIATION INC — $1,950 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE EAST END I — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR PALM BEACH AND MARTIN COUNTIES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHAPIN SCHOOL LTD — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPromise Ranch Therapeutic Riding — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCONNOR'S HOPE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetTHE SOUTHAMPTON FRESH AIR HOME — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREENE SCHOOL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGINA HEALTH CENTER — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RHONDA'S KISS
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Heidelberg University
  • Who funds RED SNEAKERS FOR OAKLEY INC
  • Who funds MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds HOPEWELL
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL
  • Who funds FRESH RX INC
  • Who funds AMEND ORG
  • Who funds GLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds ST GEORGE'S SCHOOL
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY SCHOOL
  • Who funds HATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOL
  • Who funds IAMA THEATRE COMPANY
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds LAKE AGAWAM CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds SAILING HEALS INC
  • Who funds HOLLYWOOD FOOD COALITION
  • Who funds PHASE ONE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Alexs Way
  • Who funds TOMMY DEROIA SUCCESS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MISS HALL'S SCHOOL INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Third Federal FoundationOH15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Third Federal Foundation · Borchardt Family Foundation Inc · The Sam J Frankino Foundation · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · The Cleveland Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Stefanski Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Palm Beach Day Academy Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Stefanski Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Stefanski Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph