Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Stateside Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$80k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$285kHealth$186kInternational$59kPublic Safety & Disaster$36kEnvironment$19kArts & Culture$13kHuman Services$9kScience & Tech$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
$4,182
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RED DOOR COMMUNITY$30,000
ASTON UNIVERSITY IN THE AMERICAS I$25,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$5,000
ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$5,000
UNICEF$4,182
CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE$4,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$3,000
WORLD VISION$2,340
MERCY SHIPS$1,030
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $4k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
RI
CA
UT
VA
DE
AR
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$503k · 16 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +76% since the first grant, against +44% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
32

Total granted

$503k
$122k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+44%

Still filing today

75%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationInternationalEnvironmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RD
    RED DOOR COMMUNITY INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $123k · revenue +84%
  • PB
    PALM BEACH STATE COLLEGE FDN INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $85k · revenue +260%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2017–2022 · $21k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • BS
    BRITISH SCHOOL & UNIVERSITIES FOUND
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • GC
    GILDAS CLUB NYC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • MA
    MESOTHELLOMA APPLIED RESEARCH FOUND
    one grant, 2019 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
2
University of Florida Health Corporation

UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…

3
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

5
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
6
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

7
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

8
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
9
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
10
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
11
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
12
National Foundation for Cancer Research

To support cancer research and public education relating to prevention, earlier diagnosis, better treatments and ultimately, a cure for cancer.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsEnvironmental Advocacy Orga…Land Conservation Organizat…Veteran Support ServicesFood Pantries & AssistanceFallen First Responder Supp…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%40%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr16%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr16%45%20–35yr13%37%35–55yr16%13%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,538

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
23/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ASTON UNIVERSITY IN THE AMERICAS I — $125,000 · OtherASTON UNIVERSITY IN THE AMERICAS IASTON UNIVERSITY IN AMERICA FD — $50,000 · OtherASTON UNIVERSITY IN AMERICA FDBRITISH SCHOOL & UNIVERSITIES FOUND — $25,000 · OtherBRITISH SCHOOL & UNIVERSITIES FOUNDMESOTHELIOMA APPLIED RESEARCH FOUND — $15,216 · Other+28 more — $90,022 · Other+28 moreRED DOOR COMMUNITY INC — $122,850 · HealthRED DOOR COMMUNITY INCNAMI National — $5,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $5,000 · HealthGILDA'S CLUB OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $5,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $5,000 · Health+2 more — $1,300 · HealthPALM BEACH STATE COLLEGE FDN INC — $85,000 · EducationPALM BEACH STATE…THE GEORGE AND BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION — $5,000 · EducationCANCER ALLIANCE OF HELP AND HOPE INC — $5,000 · EducationWORLD VISION INC — $19,955 · InternationalWORLD VISI…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $19,750 · InternationalUNITED STA…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $17,750 · InternationalMEDECINS S…+1 more — $1,030 · InternationalAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $21,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC — $10,500 · EnvironmentSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE — $5,679 · EnvironmentThe Ocean Foundation — $3,000 · EnvironmentJUNO BEACH POLICE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$305,238Health$144,650Education$95,000International$58,485Human Services$23,500Environment$19,179Public Safety & Disaster$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRED DOOR COMMUNITY INC — $122,850 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetPALM BEACH STATE COLLEGE FDN INC — $85,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $19,955 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $19,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $17,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC — $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJUNO BEACH POLICE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC — $6,725 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $5,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THE REDWOODS LEAGUE — $5,679 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCANCER ALLIANCE OF HELP AND HOPE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ocean Foundation — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOXAHATCHEE RIVER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $1,476 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMercy Ships International — $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNecrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) Society — $800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNMDP FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY11× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Stateside Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Loxahatchee River Historical Society Inc6% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc5% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph