Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Stanley L and Phyllis Berger Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$147k
Granted FY2023
15
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$96k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

77% of The Stanley L and Phyllis Berger Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Jewish Federation Of Metropolitan Detroit, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 10 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year The Stanley L and Phyllis Berger Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $147k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

10
’17
13
’20
12
’21
34
’22
10
’23
10
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$416kYouth Development$235kEducation$140kReligion$104kHealth$32kFood & Nutrition$31kHuman Services$29kInternational$4kOther$0
02FY2023 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k12 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $33k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $96k
$1,800
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATON OF METRO DETROIT$96,250
CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY$22,500
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE$10,000
GARY BURNSTEIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC$5,000
YAD EZRA$5,000
LACASA$2,500
JEWISH SENIOR LIFE$1,800
JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL$1,800
FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH$1,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$600
YOUTH TANK DETROIT$250
HAROLD E EISENBERG FOUNDATION$250
YOUTH TANK DETROIT$250
2023 ADOPT-A-FAMILY - JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$113
JARC$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PONY POWER THERAPIES: $1k → 7%BERKELEY FOOD & HOUSING PROJECT: $250 → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $2k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $1k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $600 → 8%JARC: $100 → 8%ORCHARDS CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $100 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CA
CO
WV
VA
MD
DE
TN
SC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$428k · 14 repeat orgs$152k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +120% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
69

Total granted

$428k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+120%
+29%

Still filing today

71%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $45k · revenue +10%
  • YE
    YAD EZRA
    6× · 2017–2024 · $31k · revenue +42%
  • DG
    DR GARY BURNSTEIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $18k · revenue +172%

Funded once

  • AC
    A&F CHALLENGE FUNDSERIOUS FUN CHILDREN'S NETWORK
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • TI
    TEMPLE ISRAEL OF DETROIT
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • SF
    SERIOUS FUND CHILDREN'S NETWORK
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
3
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
6
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
7
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
11
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
12
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service; the most unlike its peers is Dr Gary Burnstein Community Health Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
65/67
Grantees still filing
47/67
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $411,850 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT+4 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATON OF METRO DETROIT: $96,250 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATON OF METRO DETROITCRANBROOK SCHOOLS: $81,500 · OtherCRANBROOK SCHOOLSFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $39,100 · OtherFRIENDSHIP CIRCLEYAD EZRA: $30,600 · OtherYAD EZRAA&F CHALLENGE FUND SERIOUS FUN CHILREN'S NETWORK: $22,000 · OtherA&F CHALLENGE FUND SERIOUS FUN CHILRE…+59 more: $64,694 · Other+59 moreNORTH STAR REACH: $142,000 · Youth DevelopmentNORTH STAR REACHTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF…+2 more: $350 · Youth DevelopmentCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY: $45,000 · EducationJEAN AND SAMUEL FRANKEL JEWISH ACADEMY OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $10,000 · EducationYOUTHTANK INC: $2,500 · Education+4 more: $2,700 · EducationDR GARY BURNSTEIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC: $17,500 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $1,100 · HealthCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC: $1,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 · Health+10 more: $2,050 · HealthJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $3,400 · Human ServicesPONY POWER THERAPIES INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesInsight Housing FKA Berkeley Food and Housing Project: $250 · Human Services+2 more: $200 · Human ServicesJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $4,000 · International
Philanthropy$416,850Other$334,144Youth Development$157,350Education$60,200Health$23,650Human Services$4,850International$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $411,850 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH STAR REACH: $142,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYAD EZRA: $30,600 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetDR GARY BURNSTEIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC: $17,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJEAN AND SAMUEL FRANKEL JEWISH ACADEMY OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLACASA: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $3,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTHTANK INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMICHIGAN OVARIAN CANCER ALLIANCE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPONY POWER THERAPIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTransgender Law Center: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELLA BAKER CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAROLD E EISENBERG FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLINT JEWISH FEDERATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget826 Valencia: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDSGALA A DAVID C MCKNIGHT FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRACE CENTERS OF HOPE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH SPEAKS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAVEN FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Clearity Foundation: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInsight Housing FKA Berkeley Food and Housing Project: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMON GROUND: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOAKLAND HOPE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEACE RIVER WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLSEN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSKIDMORE COLLEGE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEviction Defense Collaborative Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe National Film Preserve Ltd: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEHLERS-DANLOS SOCIETY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRD CENTER OF MICHIGAN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NVLD PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds NORTH STAR REACH ↗
  • Who funds CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds YAD EZRA ↗
  • Who funds DR GARY BURNSTEIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds THE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds JEAN AND SAMUEL FRANKEL JEWISH ACADEMY OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds LACASA ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHTANK INC ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN OVARIAN CANCER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds PONY POWER THERAPIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI23.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Ravitz Foundation · Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation Corporation · The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · Phillip and Elizabeth Filmer Memorial · United Jewish Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · DTE Energy Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · George M and Jo Elyn Nyman Charitable Trust · Donald R and Esther Simon Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Stanley L and Phyllis Berger Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Stanley L and Phyllis Berger Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Mote Marine Laboratory Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Stanley L and Phyllis Berger Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Stanley L and Phyllis Berger Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 101 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stanley L and Phyllis Berger Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph