Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Soloviev Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
53
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$4.6MArts & Culture$1.2MHealth$1.2MInternational$1.1MCrime & Legal$558kHuman Services$555kRecreation & Sports$340kSocial Science$200kOther$0
02FY2024 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $519k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $625k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.0M
$15,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$218M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUTTER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$1,000,000
GONZAGA UNIVERSITY$500,000
SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA$500,000
THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN$100,000
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATION$100,000
NEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION$100,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$100,000
HUDSON INSTITUTE$100,000
CITIZENS CRIME COMMISSION OF NYC$75,000
TRUCE FOUNDATION OF THE USA INC$50,000
CHABAD YOUNG PROFESSIONALS$44,000
ADVENT CHURCH$35,000
HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY FOUNDATION$35,000
RIVER SCHOOL PS 281 - PTA$35,000
DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $692k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JACOB A RIIS NEIGHBORHOOD SETTLEMENT: $25k → 13%LOISAIDA INC: $5k → 28%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250k → 14%GREELEY-WALLACE COUNTY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%LAZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%ROOTS AND WINGS INC: $100k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100k → 14%LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $10k → 17%ROOTS AND WINGS INC: $25k → 11%BRIDGEHAMPTON CHILD CARE AND RECREATIONAL CENTER: $50k → 7%GIVE 2 GIVE FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%THE ORPHANED STARFISH FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%THE ORPHANED STARFISH FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
KS
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

29%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.0M · 21 repeat orgs$7.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 38 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
19

Total granted

$3.0M
$5.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+8%

Still filing today

76%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN
    2× · 2023–2024 · $350k · revenue +3%
  • BR
    BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +34%
  • HI
    Hudson Institute Inc
    2× · 2021–2024 · $200k · revenue +189%

Funded once

  • UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENTgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3.0M · revenue +96%
  • AMERICARES FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M · revenue +35%
  • RC
    RED CARD THE MOVIE LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $382k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
2
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
3
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
New York Dental Affiliates Pc

Operating as an integral part of the nyc health + hospitals ("h+h"), formerly the new york city health and hospitals corporation. nyda will further h+h's tax-exempt charitable, scientific, and educational purposes by enhancing the…

Health
6
Hudson Yards Development Corporation

See schedule oto coordinate and facilitate the economic development of the hudson yards area of manhattan. this includes construction of an extension to the no. subway line, the coordination of the design and construction of certain public…

Community Improvement
7
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
10
Ie New York College

(see schedule o)

Education
11
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Henry Street Settlement and the most unlike its peers is Soloviev American Russian Cultural Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Environmental Conservation …Youth Sports ProgramsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Animal Rescue and ShelterChristian Missionary Organi…Independent K-12 SchoolsSchool Parent OrganizationsCancer Support ServicesJewish Community Organizati…Affordable Housing Developm…Immigrant Worker SupportCommunity FoundationsLocal History Museums
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%7%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%9%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%50%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/60
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,505

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
53/54
Grantees still filing
29/54
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT — $3,000,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALU…SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA — $500,000 · EducationSAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIACORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY — $500,000 · EducationCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY+4 more — $158,000 · EducationRED CARD THE MOVIE LLC — $382,287 · OtherRED CARD THE MOVIE LLCSPORT AT SERVICE OF HUMANITY FOUNDATION — $300,000 · OtherSPORT AT SERVICE OF HUMANI…MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY — $250,000 · OtherMARYMOUNT UNIVERSITYHudson Institute Inc — $200,000 · OtherHudson Institute IncBLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATION — $200,000 · OtherBLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDAT…PLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC — $150,000 · OtherPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND …THE SOUTHAMPTON ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC — $85,000 · Other+40 more — $978,484 · Other+40 moreSUTTER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 · HealthSUTTER MED…+2 more — $35,000 · HealthAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $1,000,000 · InternationalAMERICARES…SOLOVIEV AMERICAN RUSSIAN CULTURAL FOUNDATION — $575,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $157,200 · Arts & CultureAsheville Art Museum Association Inc — $50,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more — $27,000 · Arts & CultureWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $350,000 · Human ServicesRoots and Wings Inc — $125,000 · Human ServicesBridgehampton Child Care and Recreational Center Inc — $50,000 · Human ServicesOrphaned Starfish Foundation Inc — $50,000 · Human ServicesJACOB A RIIS NEIGHBORHOOD SETTLEMENT — $25,000 · Human ServicesHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT — $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE GIVE TO GIVE FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Human ServicesGREELEY-WALLACE CO HEALTHCARE FDN — $25,000 · Human Services+3 more — $16,500 · Human ServicesTHE NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN — $350,000 · Crime & LegalNEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION INC — $125,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more — $2,500 · Crime & Legal
Education$4,158,000Other$2,545,771Health$1,035,000International$1,000,000Arts & Culture$809,200Human Services$691,500Crime & Legal$477,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT — $3,000,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetSUTTER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOLOVIEV AMERICAN RUSSIAN CULTURAL FOUNDATION — $575,000 over 3y, 100% of budgetSAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA — $500,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY — $500,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN — $350,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $350,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY — $250,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetHudson Institute Inc — $200,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $157,200 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC — $150,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNew York University — $130,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK CITY POLICE FOUNDATION INC — $125,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetRoots and Wings Inc — $125,000 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetTHE SOUTHAMPTON ANIMAL SHELTER FOUNDATION INC — $85,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetBridgehampton Child Care and Recreational Center Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetAsheville Art Museum Association Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetOrphaned Starfish Foundation Inc — $50,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOPE PROGRAM INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOUSING PARTNERSHIP DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $26,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJACOB A RIIS NEIGHBORHOOD SETTLEMENT — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE INNER CIRCLE OF NEW YORK POLITICAL JOURNALISTS INC D/B/A INNER CIRCLE — $25,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GIVE TO GIVE FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGREELEY-WALLACE CO HEALTHCARE FDN — $25,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetTROOPERS MEMORIAL FUND INC — $20,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetSOMOS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNEW YORKERS FOR PARKS — $15,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCITIZENS HOUSING & PLANNING COUNCIL OF N — $15,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSTUDENT ADVOCACY INC — $12,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE MURRAY HILL COMMITTEE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetLENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO AGRICULTURAL LEADERSHIP PROGRAM — $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCreative Arts Workshops for Kids Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUDOLF STEINER SCHOOL INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLoisaida Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetOPHTHALMICEDGE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetDMF YOUTH INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNORTH FORK BREAST HEALTH COALITION INC — $3,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetEAST HAMPTON TOWN PBA — $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTADA THEATRE AND DANCE ALLIANCE INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAZ CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundThe Hyde and Watson F…The Henry Luce Founda…United Way Miami IncThe New York Communit…The Ford FoundationThe Goldman Sachs Cha…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…National Philanthropi…Verizon FoundationCharities Aid Foundat…Morgan Stanley Global…
Jewish Communal FundNY15.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Henry Luce Foundation Inc · United Way Miami Inc · The New York Community Trust · The Ford Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Verizon Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Soloviev Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Soloviev Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Soloviev Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines