Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Socha-Cardillo Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$47kReligion$21kHealth$21kRecreation & Sports$13kEnvironment$11kHousing & Shelter$10kHuman Services$8kAnimals$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$750
Median grant
10
States reached
$256k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$4,000
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO BOULDER FOUNDATION$2,000
DISABLED SPORTS OF THE EASTERN SIERRA$1,500
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS$1,200
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$1,000
DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER$1,000
NAVY-MARINE CORPS RELIEF SOCIETY$1,000
JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE$1,000
SISTERS OF NOTRE DAME$750
FRANCISCAN SISTERS OF OUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP$750
BACK TO THE WILD$500
BELLEVUE FISH AND LOAVES$500
MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS$500
SORROWFUL MOTHER SHRINE$500
MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $1k → 14%THE AMERICAN RED CROSS: $750 → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $1k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER: $750 → 14%THE AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER: $500 → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER: $500 → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $500 → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$149k · 25 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
3

Total granted

$149k
$900

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+40%

Still filing today

64%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthAnimalsHuman ServicesEnvironmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +36%
  • AM
    ACCESS MAMMOTH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $13k · revenue +14%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $11k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • FOOD FOR THE POOR INC
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue -56%
  • THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $200 · revenue +40%
  • MR
    MAD RIVER RAILROAD MUESUM
    one grant, 2017 · $200
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
2
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation

To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.

Animals
3
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
4
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
5
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
8
National Forest Foundation

The national forest foundation, chartered by congress, engages americans in community-based and national programs that promote the health and public enjoyment of the 193-million acre national forest system, and accepts and administers…

Recreation & Sports
9
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
10
National Philanthropic Trust

National philanthropic trust ("npt") is a public charity dedicated to increasing philanthropy in society by providing philanthropic expertise to donors, foundations and financial institutions, enabling them to realize their philanthropic…

Philanthropy
11
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
12
Foundation for Financial Planning Inc

Our mission is to help people in need improve their financial lives by expanding access to pro bono financial planning.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bellevue Fish and Loaves. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
16/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $31,200 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONACCESS MAMMOTH: $12,950 · EducationACCESS MAMMOTHUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $11,150 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATIONBELLEVUE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION THE: $10,500 · OtherBELLEVUE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION THESORROWFUL MOTHER SHRINE: $5,350 · OtherSORROWFUL MOTHER SHRINEFRANCISCAN SISTERS OF OUR LADY OF PERPETUAL HELP: $5,300 · OtherFRANCISCAN SISTERS OF OUR LADY OF PERPETUA…SISTERS OF NOTRE DAME: $5,300 · OtherSISTERS OF NOTRE DAMEBELLEVUE FISH AND LOAVES: $4,500 · OtherBELLEVUE FISH AND LOAVESST JOSEPH'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $4,000 · OtherST JOSEPH'S CATHOLIC CHURCHUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO BOULDER FOUNDATION: $4,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO BOULDER FOUNDATIONFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $2,900 · OtherNAVY-MARINE CORPS RELIEF SOCIETY: $5,250 · OtherNAVY-MARINE CORPS RELIEF SOCIETYMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $4,750 · OtherMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION+7 more: $4,050 · Other+7 moreNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $10,750 · EnvironmentTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $6,500 · HealthLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SACRED HEART HOME: $2,600 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,620 · HealthBACK TO THE WILD INC: $5,090 · AnimalsJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $1,000 · AnimalsDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $4,750 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,250 · Human ServicesHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $5,700 · Housing & Shelter
Education$55,300Other$55,900Environment$10,750Health$10,720Animals$6,090Human Services$6,000Housing & Shelter$5,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $31,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetACCESS MAMMOTH: $12,950 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $11,150 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $10,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBELLEVUE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION THE: $10,500 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $5,700 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNAVY-MARINE CORPS RELIEF SOCIETY: $5,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBACK TO THE WILD INC: $5,090 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $4,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $4,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBELLEVUE FISH AND LOAVES: $4,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $2,900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SACRED HEART HOME: $2,600 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,620 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS MAMMOTH ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds BELLEVUE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION THE ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds NAVY-MARINE CORPS RELIEF SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BACK TO THE WILD INC ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BELLEVUE FISH AND LOAVES ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SACRED HEART HOME ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Socha-Cardillo Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Socha-Cardillo Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Socha-Cardillo Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph