Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Smith Global Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$334k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Education$290kFood & Nutrition$217kHealth$199kHuman Services$133kPhilanthropy$102kAnimals$74kPublic Safety & Disaster$32kYouth Development$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $62k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$37
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PETER THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC SCHOOL$250,000
THE HUB HOUSTON INC$27,200
THE CHILDREN'S FUND INC$15,000
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION$10,000
THE WOMEN'S RESOURCE OF GREATER HOUSTON$10,000
MERCYFIRST$7,500
HOUSTON ARBORETUM & NATURE CENTER$6,000
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$5,000
HOUSTON GIRLS HOCKEY ASSOCIATION$1,500
FAITHFUL PAWS PET THERAPY$1,000
THE ROSE$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $78k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MERCYFIRST: $8k → 6%FRIENDS FOR WISHES: $10k → 17%BOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC: $25k → 16%FRIENDS FOR WISHES: $10k → 16%ASSIST THE OFFICER INC: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

24%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$243k · 7 repeat orgs$784k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
18

Total granted

$243k
$503k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
0%

Still filing today

57%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $281k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsInternationalEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HUB HOUSTON INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $77k · revenue -5%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S FUND INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $65k · revenue +2%
  • PT
    PTA TEXAS CONGRESS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $40k

Funded once

  • The Houston Food Bank
    one grant, 2024 · $140k · revenue +19%
  • MAUI FOOD BANK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $77k · revenue +138%
  • MH
    MAUI HUMANE SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $69k · revenue +79%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Houston Health Foundation

Houston health foundation (hhf) has the mission of creating private/public partnerships for sustainable health and wellness initiatives and programs in our communities.

Philanthropy
2
Trees for Houston

Plant, protect and promote trees all over the greater Houston area.

3
Houston Area Community Services

Our mission is to provide high quality and caring services to promote healthy people and communities.

Health
4
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
5
Target Hunger Inc

The mission of Target Hunger is to alleviate hunger and its root causes in the Houston neighborhoods we serve. Target Hunger is on the front lines of hunger every day through its food distribution system that includes multiple food…

Human Services
6
Houston Business Coalition On Health

Serving houston employers we create value-based healthcare benefits of the future. (see expanded description).

Health
7
Harris County Medical Society

Our mission is to be the leading advocate for our member physicians, their patients and our community, in promoting the highest standards of ethical medical practice, access to quality medical care, medical education, research, and…

8
The Methodist Hospital

To provide high quality, cost-effective health care that delivers the best value to the people we serve in a spiritual environment of caring in association with internationally recognized teaching and research.

Health
9
Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County

The mission of Family Service Center of Houston and Harris County (Family Houston) is to create a stronger community for tomorrow by helping individuals and families meet the challenges they face today. We help others help themselves.

Human Services
10
Memorial Hermann Medical Group

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
11
Memorial Hermann Community Benefit Corporation

To implement solutions that promote good health for the individual, the health system and the community. we collaborate with others as well as create signature, evidence-based ways to improve the communities where people live, work, learn…

Social Science
12
Houston Christian Foundation dba National Christian Foundation Houston

As the Houston affiliate of the National Christian Foundation (NCF), our mission is to serve and encourage givers to grow as faithful stewards who give wisely to further the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercyfirst and the most unlike its peers is Friends for Wishes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDevelopmental Disabilities …Food Pantries & AssistanceFallen First Responder Supp…Child and Family ServicesSubstance Abuse TreatmentLand Conservation Organizat…Youth Ice Hockey ProgramsLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Cancer Support OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionNative Hawaiian Community D…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%9%<5yr16%4%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr10%26%35–55yr13%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%1%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr10%39%35–55yr13%9%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,778

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
6/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST PETER THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC SCHOOL — $250,000 · OtherST PETER THE APOSTLE CATHOLIC SCHOOLThe Houston Food Bank — $140,000 · OtherThe Houston Food BankTHE CHILDREN'S FUND INC — $65,000 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S FUND INCPTA TEXAS CONGRESS — $40,000 · OtherPTA TEXAS CONGRESSLEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY INC — $25,000 · Other+13 more — $66,050 · Other+13 moreTHE HUB HOUSTON INC — $77,200 · HealthTHE HUB HOUSTON…VICTORY HOUSTON INC — $52,000 · HealthVICTORY HOUSTON…The Council on Recovery — $12,000 · HealthThe Council on …NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $5,000 · Health+1 more — $2,000 · HealthHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $79,617 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COM…The Women's Resource of Greater Houston — $22,060 · PhilanthropyThe Women'…Assist the Officer Inc — $25,000 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS FOR WISHES — $20,000 · Human ServicesMERCYFIRST — $7,500 · Human ServicesMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $77,167 · Food & NutritionMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY — $69,366 · AnimalsWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $32,460 · InternationalUnited States Association for UNHCR — $14,091 · International
Other$586,050Health$148,200Philanthropy$101,677Human Services$77,500Food & Nutrition$77,167Animals$69,366International$46,551

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $140,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $79,617 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUB HOUSTON INC — $77,200 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $77,167 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY — $69,366 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S FUND INC — $65,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetVICTORY HOUSTON INC — $52,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $32,460 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAssist the Officer Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Women's Resource of Greater Houston — $22,060 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS FOR WISHES — $20,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR — $14,091 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Council on Recovery — $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSTON COMMUNITY TOOLBANK INC — $10,313 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMERCYFIRST — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Arboretum & Nature Center — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOODS PROJECT — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOUSTON GIRLS HOCKEY ASSOCIATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ROSE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX21.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · The William Stamps Farish Fund · MD Anderson Foundation · Sterling-Turner Foundation · Tll Temple Foundation · Harry S & Isabel C Cameron Foundation Sentinel Trust Company · Strake Foundation · The Zions Bancorporation Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · Union Pacific Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Smith Global Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Smith Global Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Smith Global Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph