Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Sloat-Prince Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$272kAnimals$46kArts & Culture$40kHuman Services$30kCommunity Improvement$21kReligion$20kYouth Development$5kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Chase Ranch Foundation$16,000
University of New Mexico$15,000
New Mexico Highlands University$6,000
West Texas A & M University$4,500
Raton Arts & Humanities Council Inc$3,477
CNM Community College$3,000
Western New Mexico University$3,000
Kansas State University$3,000
Rocky Mountain College of Art & Design$3,000
New Mexico Tech$3,000
Dordt University$3,000
New Mexico State University$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Chase Ranch Foundation: $16k → 19%Chase Ranch Foundation: $8k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MA
OR
IA
CO
AZ
NM
KS
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$395k · 25 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
13

Total granted

$395k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+38%

Still filing today

32%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RA
    RATON ARTS AND HUMANITIES COUNCIL INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +14%
  • CR
    Chase Ranch Foundation
    2× · 2023–2025 · $24k · revenue +64%
  • RH
    RATON HUMANE SOCIETY
    4× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +140%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
  • CC
    COLFAX COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +149%
  • TS
    THE SANTA FE TRAIL SCHOOL FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Roosevelt County Community Development Center

Full service economic development agency for roosevelt county, portales, and eastern new mexico university

Community Improvement
2
Rio Grande Trails and Tales
Education
3
El Rancho De Las Golondrinas Inc

To preserve the legacy of the land and the cultural traditions of new mexico.

Arts & Culture
4
Garza County Historical Museum

Historical museum

—
5
Tucson Desert Art Museum Inc

The preservation, acquisition, and exhibition of historic and contemporary southwestern art so that the public can appreciate and understand the heritage of the desert southwest and its surrounding areas. the museum will educate through…

Arts & Culture
6
Northern New Mexico Radio Foundation

The mission of nnmrf is to manage and operate a public non-commercial radio station, ksfr. ksfr serves the public interest by providing cultural, entertainment, and educational radio broadcast programs for santa fe, new mexico and the…

—
7
Northern Gila County Historical Society Inc

History Preservation & Education To acquire and preserve artifacts and writings related to the history and culure Northern Gila County for exhibit and research.

—
8
Barton County Historical Society

Historical museum and library. preservation of historical information and materials relating to barton county kansas.

—
9
Rancho Santa Fe Historical Society

To collect, preserve and interpret documents and artifacts of an historical nature. provide programs, publications, historical sites and special events to educate the public.

Arts & Culture
10
Quay County Fair Board

The purpose is conducting and holding an annual fair at the quay county, new mexico and to encourage the science and pursuits of agriculture, horticulture, arts and breeding of domestic animals, livestock and poultry, and to receive and…

Food & Nutrition
11
Napa County Historical Society

Vision Statement:To be one of the premier county historical societies in America as measured by robust membership 1% of the county population financial sustainability and national and state recognition.Purpose & Mission: The purpose of the…

Arts & Culture
12
Gunnison Valley Observatory Inc

Establish and operate an observatory open to the public and to universities via the internet or in person to further education and research in astronomy, with special emphasis on k-12 student education.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Raton Arts and Humanities Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is Chase Ranch Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of New Mexico: $58,500 · OtherUniversity of New MexicoNew Mexico State University: $40,000 · OtherNew Mexico State UniversityRaton Public Schools: $28,155 · OtherRaton Public SchoolsCOLFAX PET RESCUE: $25,500 · OtherCOLFAX PET RESCUERATON HUMANE SOCIETY: $20,000 · OtherRATON HUMANE SOCIETYNew Mexico Tech: $16,500 · OtherShuler Restoration Inc: $14,500 · OtherCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY: $12,250 · OtherFort Lewis College: $12,000 · OtherCNM Community College: $12,000 · Other+17 more: $98,095 · Other+17 moreBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $12,000 · EducationBAYLOR UN…NEW MEXICO HIGHLANDS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · EducationNEW MEXIC…DORDT UNIVERSITY: $4,500 · EducationDORDT UNI…GOLDEN SPREAD RURAL FRONTIER COALITION: $4,500 · EducationGOLDEN SP…Bay Path University: $3,000 · EducationBay Path …RATON ARTS AND HUMANITIES COUNCIL INC: $25,431 · Arts & CultureTHE SANTA FE TRAIL SCHOOL FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureChase Ranch Foundation: $23,500 · Human ServicesGREATER RATON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $12,000 · Community ImprovementRATON MAINSTREET INC: $2,500 · Community ImprovementCOLFAX COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$337,500Education$36,000Arts & Culture$30,431Human Services$23,500Community Improvement$14,500Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOLFAX PET RESCUE: $25,500 over 4y, 29% of budgetRATON ARTS AND HUMANITIES COUNCIL INC: $25,431 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetChase Ranch Foundation: $23,500 over 2y, 10% of budgetRATON HUMANE SOCIETY: $20,000 over 4y, 8.6% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $12,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER RATON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $12,000 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetNEW MEXICO HIGHLANDS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCOLFAX COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $6,095 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE SANTA FE TRAIL SCHOOL FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetDORDT UNIVERSITY: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN SPREAD RURAL FRONTIER COALITION: $4,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBay Path University: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRATON MAINSTREET INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLFAX PET RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds RATON ARTS AND HUMANITIES COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Chase Ranch Foundation ↗
  • Who funds RATON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER RATON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO HIGHLANDS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COLFAX COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SANTA FE TRAIL SCHOOL FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds COLFAX COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds DORDT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN SPREAD RURAL FRONTIER COALITION ↗
  • Who funds Bay Path University ↗
  • Who funds RATON MAINSTREET INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The George Macaron Family Charitable FoundationNM17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The George Macaron Family Charitable Foundation · Whited Foundation · Daniels Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Sloat-Prince Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Sloat-Prince Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Bay Path University: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Sloat-Prince Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Sloat-Prince Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sloat-Prince’s filings →

More from the funding graph