· Private foundation
The Sloat-Prince Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Chase Ranch Foundation | $16,000 |
| University of New Mexico | $15,000 |
| New Mexico Highlands University | $6,000 |
| West Texas A & M University | $4,500 |
| Raton Arts & Humanities Council Inc | $3,477 |
| Dordt University | $3,000 |
| Rocky Mountain College of Art & Design | $3,000 |
| New Mexico Tech | $3,000 |
| Western New Mexico University | $3,000 |
| CNM Community College | $3,000 |
| Kansas State University | $3,000 |
| New Mexico State University | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RARATON ARTS AND HUMANITIES COUNCIL INC8× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +14%
- CRChase Ranch Foundation2× · 2023–2025 · $24k · revenue +64%
- RHRATON HUMANE SOCIETY4× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +140%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $11k
- CCCOLFAX COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +149%
- TSTHE SANTA FE TRAIL SCHOOL FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INCone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Full service economic development agency for roosevelt county, portales, and eastern new mexico university
To preserve the legacy of the land and the cultural traditions of new mexico.
Historical museum
The preservation, acquisition, and exhibition of historic and contemporary southwestern art so that the public can appreciate and understand the heritage of the desert southwest and its surrounding areas. the museum will educate through…
The mission of nnmrf is to manage and operate a public non-commercial radio station, ksfr. ksfr serves the public interest by providing cultural, entertainment, and educational radio broadcast programs for santa fe, new mexico and the…
History Preservation & Education To acquire and preserve artifacts and writings related to the history and culure Northern Gila County for exhibit and research.
Historical museum and library. preservation of historical information and materials relating to barton county kansas.
To collect, preserve and interpret documents and artifacts of an historical nature. provide programs, publications, historical sites and special events to educate the public.
The purpose is conducting and holding an annual fair at the quay county, new mexico and to encourage the science and pursuits of agriculture, horticulture, arts and breeding of domestic animals, livestock and poultry, and to receive and…
Vision Statement:To be one of the premier county historical societies in America as measured by robust membership 1% of the county population financial sustainability and national and state recognition.Purpose & Mission: The purpose of the…
Establish and operate an observatory open to the public and to universities via the internet or in person to further education and research in astronomy, with special emphasis on k-12 student education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Raton Arts and Humanities Council Inc and the most unlike its peers is Chase Ranch Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COLFAX PET RESCUE ↗
- Who funds RATON ARTS AND HUMANITIES COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds Chase Ranch Foundation ↗
- Who funds RATON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO HIGHLANDS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER RATON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds COLFAX COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC ↗
- Who funds THE SANTA FE TRAIL SCHOOL FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds COLFAX COUNTY FAIR ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN SPREAD RURAL FRONTIER COALITION ↗
- Who funds DORDT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Bay Path University ↗
- Who funds RATON MAINSTREET INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The George Macaron Family Charitable Foundation · Whited Foundation · Daniels Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Sloat-Prince Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bay Path University — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Sloat-Prince Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Sloat-Prince Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.