Skip to content

Delaware · Private foundation

The Slemp Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
263
Grants FY2025
133
Organizations funded FY2024
70%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$1,250
Largest grant, FY2025
$275,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 133
FY2021 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
8
Total assets, FY2025
$29M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 70% of the organizations The Slemp Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 72% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EducationPublic Safety & DisasterCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentAnimalsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving244$1.2M66%
FY2024133$1.4M70%
FY2023128$1.5M95%
FY20221$274k100%
FY202119$771kn/a
99% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$2.6MArts & Culture$2.0MHuman Services$156kRecreation & Sports$133kPublic Safety & Disaster$102kCommunity Improvement$99kFood & Nutrition$64kYouth Development$50kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
WI
MA
IN
OH
PA
CA
KY
VA
TN
NC
AL
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 25 grantees
All grantees of The Slemp Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Pro Art Association$368,000430%
The University of Virginia's College at Wise Foundation Inc$340,00022%
Mountain Empire Community College Foundation Inc$210,00026%
Friends of the Southwest Virginia Museum Inc$150,0001n/a
William King Museum of Art$139,70044%
Lonesome Pine Arts & Crafts Inc$111,169345%
Symphony of the Mountains$105,00044%
Stickleyville Volunteer Fire Dept$101,600151%
Mountain Empire Older Citizens Inc$100,00040%
Mountain Empire Community College$95,0001n/a
Stickleyville School Community Center Association$71,33421%
Origin Project Incorporated$55,000235%
Lee County Public Schools$34,0001n/a
Boy Scouts of America Council 713 Sequoyah$30,00020%
The Dollywood Foundation$30,0001n/a
Appalachian Community Action & Development$25,00011%
Depaul Community Resources$23,68230%
St Paul Tomorrow Inc$19,9853n/a
Wise County Humane Society$15,000210%
Ballad Health$9,94010%
Historical Society of the Pound$6,0001n/a
Alice Lloyd College$5,00010%
Sleep in Heavenly Peace Inc$5,0001n/a
Emmanuel Christian Center$1,2501n/a
Project Soldiers & Skins$1,2501n/a

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 370 recipients with no EIN on record ($3.1M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

The Slemp Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 4 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 16 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPro Art Association: $368,000 over 4y, 30% of budgetThe University of Virginia's College at Wise Foundation Inc: $340,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetMountain Empire Community College Foundation Inc: $210,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetWilliam King Museum of Art: $139,700 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetLonesome Pine Arts & Crafts Inc: $111,169 over 3y, 45% of budgetSymphony of the Mountains: $105,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetStickleyville Volunteer Fire Dept: $101,600 over 1y, 51% of budgetMountain Empire Older Citizens Inc: $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetStickleyville School Community Center Association: $71,334 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetOrigin Project Incorporated: $55,000 over 2y, 35% of budgetBoy Scouts of America Council 713 Sequoyah: $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAppalachian Community Action & Development: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDepaul Community Resources: $23,682 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWise County Humane Society: $15,000 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetBallad Health: $9,940 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlice Lloyd College: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 16.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Genan FoundationVA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Genan Foundation · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · The Richard & Leslie Gilliam Foundation · Food City Charitable Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Slemp Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Slemp Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Slemp Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Slemp Foundation

How much does The Slemp Foundation give?
The Slemp Foundation reported 263 grants totaling $1,312,584 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 133 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2024.
What does The Slemp Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (38%), Arts & Culture (29%), Human Services (2%).
Who are The Slemp Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2025: Pro Art Association ($368k), The University of Virginia's College at Wise Foundation Inc ($340k), Mountain Empire Community College Foundation Inc ($210k).
Does The Slemp Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 70% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Slemp Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Slemp Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Genan Foundation, LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc, The Richard & Leslie Gilliam Foundation.
Where is The Slemp Foundation based?
The Slemp Foundation is based in DE.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 396 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Slemp’s filings →

More from the funding graph